top of page

Glossary

Dive into the terminology of landrace cannabis

P1050588-2.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Cannabis comes with a lot of jargon - botanical, cultural and scientific. Landraces, chemotypes, terroir, phenotypes…the list goes on. It’s easy to get lost if you’re new or even if you’ve been around the plant for years.

This section is your guide to what all those terms actually mean. Definitions and context. Why the word matters, where it comes from and how it connects to cultivation, culture and conservation.

​​

Whether you’re a grower, a genetics nerd or just curious: this is the place to get clear on the language of cannabis.

DJI_0668.jpg

Plant types

Cannabis populations categorized by their ecological status, domestication history and primary use.

Cannabis plant types refer to broad ecological and agronomic categories that describe how populations have evolved in relation to human management, environmental adaptation and selection.

The main plant types include:

  • Wild: theoretical ancestral populations that evolved independently of domestication

  • Feral: escaped or abandoned domesticates that have naturalized outside cultivation

  • Domesticates: plants shaped through deliberate or indirect selection for fiber, seed, resin, or biomass

 

Among domesticates, further distinctions include:

  • Landraces: regionally adapted traditional populations maintained by local farming systems

  • Heirlooms: stabilized lines preserved across generations outside formal breeding

  • Hybrids: progeny of crosses between genetically distinct parents, often used in commercial cultivation

 

Use-based subtypes include:

 

These categories are non-taxonomic and not mutually exclusive. A single population may express traits associated with multiple plant types depending on its cultivation history, use context and degree of human intervention.

Related terms: [Wild] | [Feral] | [Landrace] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049048.jpg

Wild Cannabis

Definition: Wild Cannabis refers to populations of Cannabis sativa that may represent genuinely indigenous, undomesticated plants growing in their native habitats.

 

Unlike feral or escaped plants which derive from cultivated stock, wild populations would be ancestral genepools, unchanged by human selection.

McPartland and Small noted:

...Cannabis “wild-type” traits were first described by Zinger (1898): small achene (seed) size, a persistent perianth with camouflage-like mottling, and an elongated base drawn out in the shape of a short, tapered stub with a well-developed abscission layer." ¹ ²

According to Small:

"There might be genuinely wild Cannabis plants that are completely or substantially unaffected by domestication, but no one has demonstrated their existence. It is commonplace for crops that have been domesticated for very long periods to lack any evidence of genuinely wild (not merely escaped-ruderal) ancestral populations. Given the long history, extensive distribution of Cannabis by humans, and the ease of genetic exchange between cultivated and uncultivated populations, it is unlikely that unaltered wild forms still exist." ³​

References:

  1. ​Zinger NV (1898) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der weiblichen Blüthen und Inflorescenzen bei Cannabineen. Flora oder Allgemeine Botanische Zeitung 85: 189–253.

  2. McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. DOI: 10.1080/07352689.2020.1762381.

  3. Small, E. (2015). Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. Botanical Review. DOI: 10.1007/s12231-015-9312-8.

Related terms: [Feral] | [Landrace] | [Cultivar] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001069-2.jpg

Feral Cannabis

Definition: Feral cannabis refers to plants that originated from cultivated varieties but have escaped cultivation and become naturalized in the wild.

 

Unlike truly wild cannabis populations, feral cannabis plants descend from domesticated ancestors that have escaped cultivation and adapted to local environmental conditions without human intervention.

Feral cannabis populations frequently arise in areas where hemp or drug-type cannabis was historically cultivated. While feral plants may look similar to wild types, genetically they reflect their cultivated origins.  

Feral cannabis can show considerable variability in traits like cannabinoid content, flowering time, and morphology, influenced by both natural selection and genetics. Such populations are important sources of genetic diversity for breeding and conservation efforts. 

References: 

  1. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN: 978-0520270480.

  2. Small, E. (2015). Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. Botanical Review, 81(3), 189–294. DOI: 10.1007/s12231-015-9312-8.

Related terms: [Wild] | [Landrace] | [Cultivar] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001652.jpg

Landrace Cannabis

Definition: A landrace is a cultivated plant population that has evolved over time in a specific geographic region, shaped by local environmental conditions and human cultural practices. Landraces are genetically diverse and locally adapted, often valued for unique traits such as flavor, resilience, or suitability for traditional uses. ¹ ² ³

Historically, the term “landrace” was coined in the early 20th century (von Rümker, 1908) to distinguish traditional farmer varieties from modern, uniform cultivars. Early definitions focused on populations that had evolved without formal breeding programs and were selected primarily by farmers through traditional practices. ¹ ⁴

Over time, however, scholars recognised that landraces are not static or relic-like. They are dynamic populations, constantly evolving due to natural selection in local environments, ongoing seed exchange among farmers and occasional introgression from other cultivars or hybrids.

 

Zeven (1998) emphasized that landraces continuously “contaminate” each other through gene flow, leading to gradual adaptation and genetic shifts rather than fixed, pure lines. ⁴

Modern scholarship, notably that of Casañas et al. (2017), has further expanded the concept. They argue that landraces can legitimately incorporate modern breeding techniques as long as they remain tied to local adaptation, cultural practices and farmer participation. ¹ 

 

Casañas et al. propose:

“Landraces consist of cultivated varieties that have evolved and may continue evolving, using conventional or modern breeding techniques, in traditional or new agricultural environments within a defined ecogeographical area and under the influence of local human culture.”  ¹

This 'evolved' definition counters two common misconceptions:

Myth 1 - Landraces are “pure” or genetically pristine.


In reality, landraces are genetically diverse populations shaped by both natural and human-mediated gene flow. ¹

Myth 2 - Modern breeding disqualifies a landrace.


Modern breeding can be part of a landrace’s evolution if it preserves local adaptation, cultural value, and genetic diversity. ¹

---

True cannabis landraces reflect generations of selection in specific environments, carrying unique chemotypes, morphological traits, and cultural significance. Yet even these populations have often been influenced by trade, migration and more recently, global breeding trends. ²

While seeds collected from landrace growing regions can preserve genetic material, simply reproducing them in small numbers outside their native environments is not enough. A landrace arises through generations of cultivation, selection and adaptation within its traditional region, conditions that cannot be recreated in isolated grows far removed from the original cultural and ecological context.

References: 

  1. Casañas, F., Simó, J., Casals, J., & Prohens, J. (2017). Toward an evolved concept of landrace. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 145. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00145

  2. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  3. von Rümker, K. (1908). Die systematische Einteilung und Benennung der Getreidesorten für praktische Zwecke. Jahrbuch der Deutschen Landwirtschaftsgesellschaft, 23, 137–167.

  4. Zeven, A. C. (1998). Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica, 104(2), 127–139. doi: 10.1023/A:1018683119237

Related terms: [Wild] | [Feral] | [Hybrid] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001652.jpg

Heirlooms

Definition: Heirlooms are domesticated plant varieties maintained through informal, often non-commercial seed-saving networks across multiple generations.

Heirloom plants are typically open-pollinated populations selected and propagated within a localized cultural or familial context, often for culinary, medicinal, or agronomic traits adapted to specific environments. Unlike modern commercial hybrids bred for uniformity, heirlooms are genetically diverse within type and may display considerable phenotypic variation. Their conservation often relies on smallholder farmers, seed savers or community organizations who reproduce and exchange seeds outside of formalized intellectual property regimes.

Although there is no universal botanical definition, heirlooms are usually characterized by a minimum number of generations (commonly 3 to 5) of stable selection, their maintenance outside of formal breeding programs, and their cultural or historical significance. In many cases, heirloom status is defined more by lineage, memory and transmission practices than by strict genetic distinctiveness.

In cannabis, the term is sometimes used to describe stabilized varieties originating from landrace populations but maintained under cultivation in non-native environments, especially in North America or Europe. Such lines often incorporate traits selected for in new ecological or legal contexts and may diverge significantly from the original landrace gene pool due to genetic drift, selection bottlenecks, or introgression. The distinction between heirlooms and landraces is therefore contextual and may be taxonomically ambiguous.

Related terms: [Wild] | [Feral] | [Hybrid] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001623.jpg

Domesticates

Definition: Domesticates in cannabis are plant populations shaped through human selection, cultivation, and propagation for specific uses such as fiber, seed oil, psychoactive resin, or medicinal compounds.

 

Unlike wild or feral cannabis, domesticates display morphological, chemical and genetic traits reflecting centuries of human influence.

 

Archaeological evidence places the origins of cannabis domestication in Central and East Asia during the Neolithic period, with early cultivation focused on fiber and seed production. Over time, domesticated cannabis diversified into distinct forms, including low-THC hemp types and high-THC drug types.

In cannabis research and conservation, domesticates encompass two overlapping categories:

  • Traditional domesticates: cultivated on small scales, often around homes or villages, primarily for local or personal use. These populations typically maintain greater genetic diversity, regional adaptation and cultural significance. Examples include landraces grown for charas production in India or traditional medicine in Central Asia.
     

  • Commercial domesticates: cultivated at larger scales for trade or industry, frequently involving modern breeding, hybridization, and uniform cultivation practices. Examples include licensed cannabis plantations producing standardized medical flowers or modern hemp crops for fiber and seed oil.

 

These categories often blur in practice. Many traditional landraces now appear in commercial markets due to global demand for unique chemotypes or traditional products.

 

Key distinctions of domesticates include:

  • Greater morphological uniformity from human selection

  • Distinctive chemical profiles tailored to human uses

  • Reduced survival traits outside cultivation (e.g., natural seed dispersal)

  • Cultural and economic significance in regional societies

 

Modern breeding and hybridization have further complicated distinctions among domesticates, with polyhybrid populations increasingly common in commercial cultivation.

References: 

  • Purugganan, M. D., & Fuller, D. Q. (2009). The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature, 457(7231), 843–848. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07895

  • Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press. ISBN: 978-0520270480

  • Long, T., Wagner, M., Demske, D., Leipe, C., & Tarasov, P. E. (2017). Cannabis in Eurasia: origin of human use and Bronze Age transcontinental connections. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 26(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-016-0579-6

  • Small, E. (2015). Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. Botanical Review, 81(3), 189–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9312-8

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.144.46700

Related terms: [Wild] | [Feral] | [Hybrid] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001623.jpg

Drug Types

Definition: Cannabis populations selectively bred or cultivated for high cannabinoid contents, primarily for psychoactive, medicinal, or ritual use.

Drug types are distinguished from other cannabis types by their elevated concentrations of glandular trichomes and secondary metabolites, especially tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD), associated terpenoids and other aromatic compounds.

 

Drug types are usually dioecious, with distinct male and female individuals, though hermaphroditic forms also occur. Populations are typically photoperiod-sensitive, with selection pressure often favoring trichome dense bract formation and inflorescence biomass rather than stem fiber or seed yield.

Landrace drug types evolved under localized human selection for inebriating potency, taste and aroma, often in regions where traditional hashish or charas production was practiced.

 

Distinct regional lineages (such as narrow leaflet drug (NLD) types in South and Southeast Asia, or broad leaflet drug (BLD) types in the Hindu Kush) reflect divergent environmental adaptation and ethnobotanical use patterns.

The classification of “drug type” is a practical and ethnobotanical distinction, not a taxonomic one. It encompasses a wide range of genetically diverse populations and is not exclusive to modern hybrid cultivars or chemotypes. Some fiber-type plants may display low but non-zero cannabinoid production, while intensive hybridization in modern breeding has blurred traditional boundaries.

References: 

  1. Purugganan, M. D., & Fuller, D. Q. (2009). The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature, 457(7231), 843–848. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07895

  2. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press. ISBN: 978-0520270480

  3. Long, T., Wagner, M., Demske, D., Leipe, C., & Tarasov, P. E. (2017). Cannabis in Eurasia: origin of human use and Bronze Age transcontinental connections. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 26(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-016-0579-6

  4. Small, E. (2015). Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. Botanical Review, 81(3), 189–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9312-8

  5. McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.144.46700

Related terms: [Wild] | [Feral] | [Hybrid] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049600.jpg

Narrow leaf drug type (NLD)

Definition: Morphological category of drug-type cannabis characterised by narrow leaflets, lanky architecture and typically associated with low-latitude origins.

The term "Narrow Leaf Drug type" (NLD) refers to a broad morphological grouping within Cannabis sativa subsp. indica comprising populations traditionally cultivated for high-THC drug production in equatorial and subtropical regions. NLD plants exhibit elongated leaflets, open internodal spacing, and tall, flexible stems, with extended flowering periods adapted to long photoperiods and warm climates. Their inflorescences are often less dense than those of Broad Leaf Drug types (BLDs), but they may exhibit greater resistance to mold in humid environments due to their looser floral structure.

NLDs are commonly associated with landrace populations from South and Southeast Asia, tropical Africa and parts of Latin America. Many NLDs have been subjected to informal selection for psychoactive potency and desirable resin qualities but remain genetically diverse and locally adapted. Traits such as dense trichome coverage, complex terpene profiles and prolonged maturation cycles are typical, though expression varies widely within the type.

The term is descriptive, not taxonomic and overlaps only loosely with formal infraspecific classifications. 

References: 

  • Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2016). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  • Small, E. (2015). Cannabis: A Complete Guide. CRC Press.

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112.

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The Genetic Structure of Marijuana and Hemp. PLOS ONE, 10(8): e0133292.

  • Chandra, S., et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

Related terms: [BLD] | [Landrace] | [Indica vs Sativa] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Rick Proctor

Broad leaf drug type (BLD)

Definition: Morphological category of drug-type cannabis characterized by wide leaflets, compact stature, and typically associated with highland or temperate cultivation.

Broad Leaf Drug type (BLD) refers to a category within Cannabis sativa subsp. indica comprising domesticated populations traditionally grown for resin extraction in temperate or montane regions. BLD plants exhibit broad, short leaflets, dense apical inflorescences and stout, compact architecture adapted to shorter photoperiods and cooler growing seasons. These traits are often associated with the production of hashish, particularly in Central and South Asia.

BLDs are most commonly linked to traditional landrace crops from the Hindu Kush, parts of the Pamirs and western Tibet, where farmers have selected for early flowering, high glandular trichome density and cold tolerance.

 

The type is thought to represent a secondary domestication or differentiation event under highland conditions. Resin-rich inflorescences with relatively short maturation times make BLDs especially valued for hashish production and hybrid breeding.

Although widely used among breeders and researchers, the BLD designation is informal and not taxonomic. 

References: 

  • Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2016). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  • Small, E. (2015). Cannabis: A Complete Guide. CRC Press.

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112.

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The Genetic Structure of Marijuana and Hemp. PLOS ONE, 10(8): e0133292.

  • Chandra, S., et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

Related terms: [NLD] | [Hashish] | [Hybrid] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Hagar Lotte Geyer

FIBRE types (HEMP)

Definition: Domesticated cannabis plants selected primarily for bast fibre production, typically exhibiting tall, unbranched growth with low cannabinoid expression.

Fibre types of Cannabis sativa are cultivated for their bast fibres, which are harvested from the phloem tissues of the stem. These plants are typically tall (2–5 meters), with minimal lateral branching and low concentrations of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), often under 0.3% by dry weight. Agronomic selection has prioritized traits such as stem straightness, internodal length, and fibre yield, at the expense of flower development and cannabinoid production. Fibre types tend to exhibit early photoperiodic flowering responses, with males harvested earlier to maximize fibre quality.

Cannabis fibre has historically been used for textiles, rope, sails, paper and composite materials, with evidence of fibre-type cultivation dating back over 6,000 years in East Asia. While many industrial fibre cultivars have been developed through formal breeding programs in Europe, China and the former USSR, landrace fibre types persist in regions such as the Himalayan foothills, parts of Central Asia, and Southwest China, where traditional cultivation practices and multipurpose landraces remain.

 

The distinction between fibre, seed and drug types is not always clear-cut, especially in traditional agroecosystems where a single landrace population may be managed for multiple uses. Fibre types are often genetically and chemically distinct from drug types, but not reproductively isolated. As such, historical gene flow between types has shaped regional diversity.

References: 

  • Small, E., & Marcus, D. (2002). Hemp: A new crop with new uses for North America. Trends in New Crops and New Uses, ASHS Press.

  • Amaducci, S., Scordia, D., Liu, F. H., Zhang, Q., Guo, H., & Testa, G. (2015). Key cultivation techniques for hemp in Europe and China. Industrial Crops and Products, 68, 2–16.

  • Long, T., Wagner, M., Demske, D., Leipe, C., & Tarasov, P. E. (2017). Cannabis in Eurasia: Origin of human use and Bronze Age trans‐continental connections. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 26(3), 245–258.

  • Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  • Mandolino, G., & Carboni, A. (2004). Potential of marker-assisted selection in hemp genetic improvement. Euphytica, 140(1-2), 107–120.

Related terms: [NLD] | [BLD] | [Landrace] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

CANNABIS-SATIVA-seed-oil-1536x1023-1425313522.jpeg

Oilseed cannabis

Definition: Cannabis plants cultivated primarily for their seeds, valued for high oil content and nutritional profile.

Oilseed cannabis refers to domesticated varieties of Cannabis sativa selectively bred for seed yield and oil production rather than fiber or psychoactive compounds. These plants are typically short, early-flowering, and highly branched, with reduced bast fiber development and low cannabinoid content. The seeds contain approximately 25–35% oil by weight, rich in essential fatty acids such as linoleic (omega-6) and alpha-linolenic (omega-3) acids.

Historically, oilseed cannabis was cultivated across Eurasia for culinary, industrial and ceremonial purposes. In traditional agroecosystems, seed use often coexisted with fiber and drug uses (see multipurpose cannabis) but specialized oilseed types emerged in regions where dietary seed consumption or oil production was central. In modern breeding, oilseed lines have been optimized for mechanical harvesting, synchronous maturation, and reduced seed shattering.

Distinct from both fiber-type and drug-type cannabis, oilseed types exhibit specific agronomic traits and genetic markers. However, definitional boundaries between use-types remain fluid due to gene flow and the historical multifunctionality of many landrace populations. 

References: 

  1. Callaway, J. C. (2004). Hempseed as a nutritional resource: An overview. Euphytica, 140(1–2), 65–72.

  2. Amaducci, S., Scordia, D., Liu, F. H., Zhang, Q., & Guo, H. (2015). Key cultivation techniques for hemp in Europe and China. Industrial Crops and Products, 68, 2–16.

  3. Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0133292.

  4. McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112.

Related terms: [Multipurpose Cannabis] | [Hemp] | [Landrace] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1035441.jpg

Multipurpose cannabis

Definition: Cannabis populations cultivated or maintained for more than one primary use, including seed, fibre, resin and/or biomass.

Multipurpose cannabis refers to cannabis populations selected, tolerated, or managed for the simultaneous provision of several distinct outputs, such as edible oilseed, bast fibre, narcotic resin, or fuel and fodder biomass. These populations emerge in low-input, subsistence-oriented agricultural systems, where cultivators maximize utility across seasons and needs.

 

Multipurpose types are especially prevalent in South and Central Asia, where the same field may yield seeds for food or oil, fibre for rope or cloth, and resinous inflorescences for hashish preparation. 

 

Unlike specialized cultivars bred for high yields or specific traits, multipurpose types display heterogeneity in morphology and chemistry, balancing moderate seed and fibre output with varying degrees of psychoactive compound production. This often reflects the complex socio-economic roles cannabis plays in mixed farming systems, village economies and traditional medicine.

 

While modern breeding typically prioritizes narrow industrial or pharmacological traits, multipurpose landraces may hold genetic value for integrated systems resilience and trait recombination.

 

The distinction between ‘multipurpose’ and ‘dual-purpose’ cannabis is imprecise and context-dependent, as usage may vary according to many variables like: region, caste, gender or season, among others.  

References: 

  • Small, E. (2015). Evolution and Classification of Cannabis sativa (Marijuana, Hemp) in Relation to Human Utilization. Botany, 93(10), 729–755.

  • Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  • Chandra, S., et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

Related terms: [Oilseed] | [Hemp] | [Landrace] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

DJI_0668.jpg

Classifications

Cannabis at Zomia Collective isn’t just “sativa” or “indica.”

We classify cannabis using a framework that reflects how plants evolve, where they’re grown, and how people interact with them. This allows us to speak precisely about landraces, cultivars, hybrids, and other groups without relying on misleading commercial labels.

This section introduces the core categories we use to describe cannabis populations across our research, fieldwork, and seed catalog. Some terms, like variety or subspecies, are grounded in formal botanical codes. Others, like hybrid or polyhybrid, describe breeding history. Still others, like strain or landrace, are widely used but contested or inconsistently defined.

Each entry explains the origins and implications of a term: how it's used, how it's misused and why it matters. Together, these classifications form the conceptual map we use to navigate the complex genetic and cultural diversity of cannabis.

Related terms: [Variety] | [Cultivar] | [Hybrid] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1035592.jpg

Species

Definition: A species is a group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring, typically distinguished by shared morphological, genetic, and ecological characteristics.

In botanical taxonomy, the species is the fundamental unit of classification, denoting a distinct lineage of evolutionarily related individuals. Species are named using binomial nomenclature, consisting of a genus and a specific epithet, as in Cannabis sativa L. This system reflects both evolutionary relationships and morphological distinction.

In the case of Cannabis, the delimitation of species remains contested. The most widely accepted framework is the monotypic classification, which recognizes Cannabis sativa L. as a single species encompassing fiber, seed and drug-type plants across a wide ecological and morphological range.

 

Alternative frameworks propose two or more distinct species (e.g., C. sativa, C. indica, and C. ruderalis) based on geographic origin, chemotype, or growth habit. However, these multi-species models lack consistent reproductive isolation and show extensive overlap in morphological and chemical traits.

For conservation, cultivation, and breeding purposes, the practical boundaries of species are often less relevant than variation within populations and landrace lineages. Cannabis exhibits high intraspecific diversity, shaped by both natural selection and human-mediated selection, making intra-species classification (e.g., subspecies, variety, cultivar) more useful in most contexts.

References: 

  • Small, E., & Cronquist, A. (1976). A practical and natural taxonomy for Cannabis. Taxon, 25(4), 405–435.

  • Hillig, K. W. (2005). Genetic evidence for speciation in Cannabis (Cannabaceae). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52, 161–180.

  • McPartland, J. M. (2018). Cannabis systematics at the levels of family, genus, and species. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 3(1), 203–212.

  • Chandra, S., et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

Related terms: [Cultivar] | [Hybrid] | [Polyhybrid] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1035592.jpg

SubSpecies

Definition: A taxonomic rank below species used to classify genetically distinct populations with consistent morphological or geographic differences.

In botanical taxonomy, subspecies designate populations within a species that show clear and stable variation in traits such as morphology, chemical composition, or ecological adaptation. These populations remain capable of interbreeding but are distinguishable by consistent characteristics shaped by geographic or environmental isolation.

In the context of Cannabis sativa L., the subspecies concept is commonly applied to distinguish fiber-type and drug-type lineages.

 

Small and Cronquist (1976) proposed two principal subspecies under a monotypic (single species) classification: Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa, characterized by low THC and used primarily for fiber or seed oil, and Cannabis sativa subsp. indica, typically high in THC and cultivated for narcotic use. Though widely cited, this model remains contested, with competing frameworks treating Cannabis indica as a separate species.
 

Small later revised his position in 2015, emphasizing the limited genetic differentiation between these groups and instead promoting a practical classification based on domestication traits and intended use.

Building on this framework, in 2020 McPartland and Small proposed a revised model that retains C. sativa subsp. indica to refer specifically to high-THC domesticates endangered by hybridization and displacement.

 

They distinguish these from feral and wild relatives, advocating for formal recognition of landraces as distinct from modern hybrids on both ecological and cultural grounds. This conservation-oriented model reaffirms the utility of the subspecies rank in tracking domestication histories and preserving threatened germplasm.

The subspecies designation is relevant in landrace cannabis, where long-standing geographic isolation and local selection pressures have produced regionally distinct populations. However, ongoing hybridization and human-mediated gene flow complicate efforts to apply formal taxonomic ranks consistently. In practice, many cultivators use “subspecies” descriptively rather than taxonomically.

References: 

  • Small, E., & Cronquist, A. (1976). A practical and natural taxonomy for Cannabis. Taxon, 25(4), 405–435.

  • Small, E. (2015). Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. The Botanical Review, 81(3), 189–294.

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC Cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 39(5), 435–479.

Related terms: [Cultivar] | [Hybrid] | [Polyhybrid] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1035592.jpg

Indica & Sativa

Indica & Sativa refers, in botanical taxonomy, to two major subspecies within Cannabis sativa L., distinguished primarily by chemical composition, morphology and geographic origin. 

Small and Cronquist (1976) proposed a single-species model for Cannabis, separating drug-type and fiber-type plants as subspecies: 

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa

  • Typically low in THC (< 0.3%).

  • Cultivated for fiber and oilseed.

  • Tall plants with narrow leaflets.

  • Originates in temperate Eurasia.
     

Cannabis sativa subsp. indica

  • Typically high in THC (≥ 0.3%).

  • Cultivated primarily for drug use (ganja, hashish).

  • Shorter stature, broader leaflets, often denser inflorescences.

  • Originates across South and Central Asia.

 

Key clarifications:

The terms “Sativa” and “Indica” in popular cannabis culture do not align precisely with formal taxonomy. McPartland & Small (2020) emphasize that the vernacular “Sativa” corresponds to C. sativa subsp. indica var. indica (South Asian origin), while “Indica” corresponds to C. sativa subsp. indica var. afghanica (Central Asian origin). 
 

Vernacular “Sativa” generally denotes plants with narrow leaflets, tall stature, and higher THC/CBD ratios (≥ 7).

 

Vernacular “Indica” refers to broader-leaf, shorter plants, with lower THC/CBD ratios (< 7) and distinctive terpenoid profiles including sesquiterpene alcohols (e.g. guaiol). 
 

Decades of hybridization have obscured clear morphological and chemical boundaries between these groups in modern cultivated strains


McPartland & Small (2020) write:
 

“Two kinds of drug-type Cannabis gained layman’s terms in the 1980s. ‘Sativa’ had origins in South Asia (India)… ‘Indica’ had origins in Central Asia (Afghanistan, Pakistan, Turkestan)… Recent hybridization has obliterated differences between hybridized ‘Sativa’ and ‘Indica’ currently available.” 

Modern genetic studies confirm that “Sativa” and “Indica” strain labels fail to reflect meaningful genetic separation. 

References: 

  • Small, E., & Cronquist, A. (1976). A practical and natural taxonomy for Cannabis. Taxon, 25(4), 405–435. doi:10.2307/1220524

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112. doi:10.3897/phytokeys.144.46700

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLoS One, 10(8), e0133292. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133292

  • Schwabe, A. L., & McGlaughlin, M. E. (2018). Genetic tools weed out misconceptions of strain reliability in Cannabis sativa. BioRxiv. doi:10.1101/332320

Related terms: [Cultivar] | [Hybrid] | [Polyhybrid] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1035548-2.jpg

Variety

Definition: A variety (Latin: varietas) is a formal botanical rank below species and subspecies.

 

Recognized under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN), a variety designates a population of plants within a species that consistently differs from the typical form in minor but inheritable traits such as morphology, physiology or ecological adaptation and occurs naturally in the wild. 

According to the ICN:

“A variety (varietas) is a taxonomic rank below that of subspecies, used for plants differing from others of the same species in minor but usually heritable characteristics.” 

Varieties may arise through ecological adaptation to local environments or genetic drift, rather than deliberate human selection. In contrast, cultivars are human-selected and maintained for uniform traits, governed instead by the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP). 

In cannabis taxonomy, McPartland and Small (2020) proposed four botanical varieties within Cannabis sativa subsp. indica, based on consistent differences in traits like leaflet shape, THC/CBD ratios, and achene morphology. 

 

These are:

  • Cannabis sativa subsp. indica var. indica (South Asian domesticates)

  • Cannabis sativa subsp. indica var. afghanica (Central Asian domesticates)

  • Cannabis sativa subsp. indica var. himalayensis (South Asian wild-type)

  • Cannabis sativa subsp. indica var. asperrima (Central Asian wild-type)

References: 

  • Turland, N. J., et al. (2018). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code). Regnum Vegetabile 159. Koeltz Botanical Books. https://doi.org/10.12705/Code.2018

  • Brickell, C. D., Alexander, C., David, J. C., Hetterscheid, W. L. A., Leslie, A. C., Malécot, V., … & Trehane, P. (2016). International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP), 9th Edition. Scripta Horticulturae, No. 18. International Society for Horticultural Science. ISBN: 978-94-6261-116-0.

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 39(5), 435–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2020.1762381

Related terms: [Cultivar] | [Hybrid] | [Polyhybrid] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Diyahna Lewis

Cultivar

Definition: An assemblage of plants that (a) has been selected for a particular character or combination of characters, (b) is distinct, uniform, and stable in these characters, and (c) when propagated by appropriate means, retains those characters.” 

Cultivars can originate through many processes, including selective breeding, hybridization, mutation, or even modern biotechnology and may be propagated by seeds, cuttings, grafting, or other methods. However, they are not equivalent to botanical varieties (var.) or forms (f.), which refer to naturally occurring variations within a species.

The ICNCP further clarifies that common terms like “variety,” “strain,” or “form” should not be used as synonyms for “cultivar” in formal botanical nomenclature. 

In cannabis, true cultivars are intentionally bred lines meant to produce consistent traits such as specific cannabinoid profiles, flowering times, or morphology.

 

However, the cannabis industry frequently labels genetically variable seed lines as “cultivars” or “strains,” even though they may lack the uniformity and stability required under the ICNCP definition. This practice contributes to confusion about what qualifies as a cultivar versus a hybrid population or a landrace

References: 

  • Brickell, C. D., Alexander, C., David, J. C., Hetterscheid, W. L. A., Leslie, A. C., Malécot, V., … & Trehane, P. (2016). International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP), Ninth Edition. Scripta Horticulturae, No. 18. International Society for Horticultural Science. ISBN: 978-94-6261-116-0.

  • Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN: 978-0520270480.

  • Small, E. (2015). Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. Botanical Review, 81(3), 189–294. DOI: 10.1007/s12231-015-9312-8.

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 39(5), 435–479. DOI: 10.1080/07352689.2020.1762381.

Related terms: [Landrace] | [Hybrid] | [Subspecies] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Diyahna Lewis

Accession

Definition: Individual or grouped samples of plant material collected for conservation, study, or breeding, each assigned a unique identifier and associated with metadata about its origin

.

In cannabis research and conservation, an accession represents a defined unit of genetic material (such as seeds, cuttings, or entire plants) collected from a specific location or cultivation context. Each accession is typically linked to collection data including geographic origin, environmental conditions, date, collector identity and any ethnobotanical information. This metadata is critical for tracking provenance, evaluating population structure and ensuring reproducibility in breeding or academic research.

 

Accessions may be drawn from wild, feral, or domesticated populations, and can vary widely in their internal genetic diversity depending on sampling method and source population size.

 

In seedbanks, accessions serve as the primary organizational unit for long-term storage, with standardized procedures for regeneration, characterization, and documentation.

In landrace cannabis work, accessions provide the framework for situating local varieties within their ecological, cultural, and historical contexts. However, the term is not standardized across all seedbanks or breeders. Some use "accession" more loosely to refer to any collected sample, regardless of documentation or genetic resolution.

References: 

  • Brickell, C. D., Alexander, C., David, J. C., Hetterscheid, W. L. A., Leslie, A. C., Malécot, V., … & Trehane, P. (2016). International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP), Ninth Edition. Scripta Horticulturae, No. 18. International Society for Horticultural Science. ISBN: 978-94-6261-116-0.

  • Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN: 978-0520270480.

  • Small, E. (2015). Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. Botanical Review, 81(3), 189–294. DOI: 10.1007/s12231-015-9312-8.

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 39(5), 435–479. DOI: 10.1080/07352689.2020.1762381.

Related terms: [Landrace] | [Hybrid] | [Subspecies] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Diyahna Lewis

Strain

Definition: A colloquial term used to describe a distinct group of cannabis plants, lacking formal taxonomic or botanical validity.

In cannabis contexts, “strain” typically refers to a named line or population that is distinguishable by origin, morphology, chemical profile, or breeder intent. The term is widely used but is imprecise in scientific taxonomy, where terms like variety, cultivar and accession offer more rigorous alternatives. In informal use, a strain may refer to anything from a stabilized cultivar to an unstable polyhybrid or a regional landrace, depending on context.

In microbiology and plant pathology, “strain” has a stricter definition: a genetic variant or subtype of a microorganism or virus. This technical use differs from its usage in cannabis, where the term has become an umbrella for heterogeneous genetic groupings shaped by breeder selection, market forces, and popular naming conventions.

Because strain names often circulate without verification of lineage, morphological stability, or chemotypic consistency, they offer limited utility in scientific or conservation work. Landrace populations are sometimes referred to as strains in common parlance, but they are better understood as genetically diverse, locally adapted populations maintained by traditional agricultural systems.

The lack of formal criteria for defining a cannabis strain contributes to widespread confusion in both commercial and research settings. While breeders may use the term to describe intentionally selected lines, others may apply it to any visually or chemically distinct plant group. Some researchers and conservationists recommend abandoning the term altogether in favor of more precise descriptors.

References: 

  • Engels, J.M.M., & Visser, L. (Eds.). (2003). A Guide to Effective Management of Germplasm Collections. IPGRI.

  • McPartland, J.M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 39(5), 435–479.

  • van Hintum, T.J.L. (2000). Duplication within and between germplasm collections. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 47, 507–516.

Related terms: [Landrace] | [Hybrid] | [Subspecies] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Diyahna Lewis

Hybrid

Definition: A hybrid is a plant produced by crossing two genetically distinct parents, resulting in offspring that combine traits from both lineages.

 

In botany, hybrids can occur between species, subspecies, varieties, or cultivars and are recognized for expressing intermediate characteristics or novel combinations of traits.

In cannabis, the term “hybrid” broadly refers to plants derived from intentional or accidental crosses between genetically divergent populations. Such hybrids may arise from crosses between different subspecies (e.g. Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa × subsp. indica), distinct varieties within a subspecies, or separate cultivars, landraces with different geographic origins or phytochemical profiles.

 

Hybridization has long been used in cannabis breeding to combine desirable traits, such as increased trichome density/production, better plant architecture, shorter flowering times, pest resistance and specific cannabinoid and terpene profiles. However, extensive hybridization, particularly over the past half-century, has substantially eroded the once-clear genetic and morphological distinctions among traditional landrace populations. 

McPartland and Small note that:

 

breeders have haphazardly hybridized Central Asian and South Asian landraces, and largely obliterated their phenotypic differences.

 

As a result, many modern cannabis lines are hybrids to some degree, even when marketed under traditional names like “Sativa” or “Indica.” 

 

From a nomenclatural perspective, “hybrid” is not a formal botanical rank. Rather, it describes the breeding history and genetic complexity of a plant population. Hybrid strains typically lack the uniformity and stability required to qualify as true cultivars under the ICNCP definition. 

In contemporary cannabis culture, “hybrid” has also become a colloquial marketing term describing strains said to produce a blend of “Sativa-like” and “Indica-like” effects. However, such commercial classifications rarely align with documented botanical or genetic evidence.

References:

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.144.46700

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLoS One, 10(8), e0133292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133292

  • Schwabe, A. L., & McGlaughlin, M. E. (2018). Genetic tools weed out misconceptions of strain reliability in Cannabis sativa: implications for a budding industry. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/332320

  • Brickell, C. D., et al. (2016). International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP), Ninth Edition. ISHS. ISBN: 978-94-6261-116-0.

Related terms: [Polyhybrid] | [Cultivar] | [Landrace] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Robert Nelson

Polyhybrid

Definition: A polyhybrid refers to a cannabis population derived from multiple generations of hybridization involving several distinct parental lines.

 

Unlike a simple hybrid, which results from crossing two genetically different parents - a polyhybrid is the outcome of combining numerous hybrids in various breeding cycles, often from diverse geographic origins and genetic backgrounds.

In cannabis breeding, polyhybrids have become extremely common, especially in the commercial market. Breeders frequently cross hybrids with other hybrids, layering genetic contributions from many ancestral sources to combine desired traits such as cannabinoid potency, terpene profiles, disease resistance, flowering time, and plant architecture.

 

While polyhybridization can generate novel and commercially attractive phenotypes, it often introduces significant genetic variability into seed lines. As McPartland and Small observe, repeated hybridizations have "Largely obliterated” many of the morphological and chemical distinctions once characteristic of traditional landrace populations. The result is that plants sold under a single strain name may express widely differing traits, even when sourced from the same breeder or seed company.

From a nomenclatural perspective, “polyhybrid” is not a formal botanical rank. Rather, it describes the breeding history and genetic complexity of a plant population. Polyhybrid strains typically lack the uniformity and stability required to qualify as true cultivars under the ICNCP definition. 

 

In the modern cannabis industry, many so-called “cultivars” or “strains” are in fact polyhybrid populations. This helps explain why genetic analyses  often find limited consistency between strain names and plant genetics. 

Polyhybridization has been both a creative force in cannabis breeding enabling innovation and diversity and a challenge for conservation, as it contributes to genetic dilution and the erosion of distinct landrace gene pools

References:

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.144.46700

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLoS One, 10(8), e0133292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133292

  • Schwabe, A. L., & McGlaughlin, M. E. (2018). Genetic tools weed out misconceptions of strain reliability in Cannabis sativa: implications for a budding industry. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/332320

  • Brickell, C. D., et al. (2016). International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP), Ninth Edition. ISHS. ISBN: 978-94-6261-116-0.

Related terms: [Hybrid] | [Cultivar] | [Phenotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by National Cancer Institute

Genetics

This section covers core genetic concepts essential to understanding landrace cannabis populations, especially how traits are passed, expressed and selected within open-pollinated and regionally adapted gene-pools. Cannabis is a highly variable, outcrossing species with complex interactions between genotype, phenotype and environment, making genetics central to conservation and cultivation efforts.

Unlike commercial breeding programs that emphasize uniformity and control, landrace populations often exhibit high levels of heterozygosity and segregating traits. This genetic diversity reflects both evolutionary pressures and local human selection, shaped across generations of cultivation. Terms in this section help clarify how traits such as terpene production, cannabinoid ratios, morphology, and flowering cycles emerge and stabilize (or fail to) within populations.

Many of the concepts here underpin key strategies in landrace preservation, including open pollination, maintenance of large effective population sizes, and the avoidance of genetic bottlenecks. Others illuminate risks such as inbreeding depression or unwanted introgression from external pollen sources.

Each entry is framed for a landrace context, drawing from population genetics, classical Mendelian inheritance and applied breeding science.

 

This foundation supports more informed engagement with the plants and communities Zomia works with.

Related terms: [Hybrid] | [Cultivar] | [Phenotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by digitale.de

DNA

Definition: DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) is the hereditary material in all living organisms, encoding the genetic instructions used in development, function, and reproduction.

In cannabis, DNA is the molecular foundation of heredity, consisting of sequences of nucleotides (adenine, thymine, cytosine, and guanine) arranged in a double helix structure. These sequences form genes, which govern traits such as cannabinoid biosynthesis, terpene production, flowering time, and environmental adaptation. DNA is organized into chromosomes (cannabis typically has 20 chromosomes (2n = 20))and each cell contains a complete set of genetic instructions, known as the genome.

Understanding DNA is essential for plant breeding, genetic conservation, and forensic identification. DNA sequencing allows researchers to identify specific alleles, trace ancestry, detect hybridization and assess the genetic diversity of landrace populations. In conservation efforts, DNA data help distinguish between distinct gene pools and monitor the impact of genetic drift, gene flow, or bottlenecks in cultivation systems.

Though the structure and function of DNA are well understood, its role in complex traits (such as terpene synergy or stress resistance) involve multiple interacting genes and regulatory sequences that are still under investigation.

References:

  • Watson, L., & Dallwitz, M.J. (1992). The Families of Flowering Plants: Descriptions, Illustrations, Identification, and Information Retrieval.

  • Divashuk, M.G., et al. (2014). Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the dioecious Cannabis sativa with an XY chromosome sex determination system. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e85118.

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The Genetic Structure of Marijuana and Hemp. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0133292.

  • Soler, S., et al. (2017). Genetic Structure and Diversity of Cannabis sativa Germplasm. In: Chandra, S., et al. (Eds.), Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  • Onofri, C., et al. (2015). Sequence variability of Δ1-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) synthases in Cannabis sativa L. Genetica, 143, 447–457.

Related terms: [Genepool] | [Variation] | [Genotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by National Cancer Institute

Chromosomes

Definition: Structures within the cell nucleus that organize and carry genetic material in the form of DNA.

In Cannabis sativa, chromosomes are the physical units of inheritance, composed of tightly coiled DNA and associated proteins. Each cell in a diploid plant typically contains 20 chromosomes arranged in 10 homologous pairs, including one pair of sex chromosomes (XX in females, XY in males). These chromosomes house genes that govern heritable traits such as chemotype, flowering cycles and morphology. During meiosis, homologous chromosomes recombine and segregate, generating new allele combinations that contribute to phenotypic diversity.

 

Chromosome number and gross structure are generally conserved across cultivated and feral populations, which is important for stable reproduction, seed viability, and breeding for landrace conservation.

 

Cytogenetic and genomic studies using karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome‑scale assemblies have mapped sex‑linked regions, clarified that the largest pair corresponds to the sex chromosomes and located key biosynthetic loci involved in cannabinoid chemistry.


Current work continues to refine the extent of recombination suppression across the sex chromosomes and to quantify how genotype and environment modulate sex expression despite an underlying XX/XY system.

References:

  • Divashuk, M. G., Alexandrov, O. S., Razumova, O. V., Kirov, I. V., & Karlov, G. I. (2014). Molecular cytogenetic characterization of dioecious Cannabis sativa with an XY chromosome sex determination system. PLOS ONE, 9(1), e85118. 

  • Braich, S., et al. (2020). A new and improved genome sequence of Cannabis sativa. GigaByte. 

  • Prentout, D., et al. (2020). An efficient RNA‑seq‑based segregation analysis identifies the sex chromosomes in Cannabis sativa. G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics. 

  • Laverty, K. U., et al. (2019). A physical and genetic map of Cannabis sativa identifies extensive rearrangements at the THC/CBD acid synthase loci. Genome Research, 29(1), 146–156. 

  • Petit, J., et al. (2020). Genetic architecture of flowering time and sex determination in Cannabis sativa. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 569145. 

Related terms: [DNA] | [Genes] | [Genotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by National Cancer Institute

Ploidy

Definition: Ploidy refers to the number of complete sets of chromosomes present in the nucleus of a cell.

In Cannabis sativa, as in most angiosperms, the typical ploidy level is diploid, meaning each somatic cell contains two homologous sets of chromosomes (2n = 20). Ploidy influences inheritance, fertility, and morphological traits by determining how genetic material is partitioned and expressed during cell division. During sexual reproduction, meiosis reduces ploidy by half (n), producing haploid gametes that fuse to restore diploidy in the zygote.

In the context of landrace cultivation, naturally occurring ploidy variation is rare. However, artificially induced polyploidy (particularly triploids [3n] and tetraploids [4n]) has been used in experimental and commercial breeding to manipulate traits such as cannabinoid concentration, cell size, or sterility. These manipulations typically involve chemical agents like colchicine or oryzalin, which interfere with spindle formation during mitosis. Polyploid cannabis plants are generally infertile or show irregular meiosis, making them poorly suited for traditional cannabis cultivation, where seed propagation is essential.

 

Understanding ploidy is also important in conservation as unintentional mixing of accessions with altered ploidy levels can disrupt breeding dynamics and introduce sterility or segregation distortions.

References:

  • Divashuk, M. G., et al. (2014). Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the dioecious Cannabis sativa with an XY chromosome sex determination system. PLoS ONE, 9(1): e85118.

  • Rees, H. (1981). Genetic Effects of Polyploidy. In: Polyploidy: Biological Relevance. Springer.

  • Parsons, J. L., et al. (2019). Polyploidization in Cannabis sativa L.: Induction, identification, and phenotypic effects. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10: 676.

  • Dhooghe, E., et al. (2011). Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 104(3), 359–373.

Related terms: [DNA] | [Genes] | [Genotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1037956.jpg

Dioecious

Definition: Having distinct male and female individuals within a species, each producing only one type of reproductive organ.

In dioecious species, including Cannabis sativa, each plant develops either staminate (male) or pistillate (female) flowers, but not both. This sexual system enforces outcrossing (obligate outcrossing), as pollen must travel from male to female plants for fertilization to occur. Dioecy is relatively rare among angiosperms, occurring in approximately 6% of flowering plant species, but is overrepresented in certain lineages where wind or insect pollination favors separation of sexes.

In cannabis, dioecy has important implications for cultivation and breeding. It allows for controlled pollination strategies and facilitates the isolation of unpollinated female plants for higher cannabinoid yield. However, dioecy can be complicated by the presence of monoecious or intersex individuals in some populations, which may result from genetic, environmental, or hormonal influences.

The genetic basis of dioecy in Cannabis sativa is governed by an XY sex chromosome system, with males typically being heterogametic (XY) and females homogametic (XX). Yet environmental stress or hormonal manipulation (e.g., with silver thiosulfate) can induce sex reversal, reflecting the underlying plasticity of floral development in the species.

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by National Cancer Institute

Genes

Definition: Genes are units of heredity composed of DNA that encode functional products, typically proteins.

Genes govern a wide range of traits, from morphological features like leaf shape and plant height to biochemical profiles such as cannabinoid and terpene production. Each gene occupies a specific position (locus) on a chromosome and may exist in different variants called alleles, which can influence trait expression depending on dominance and interaction with other genes.

Understanding gene function is central to cannabis breeding and landrace conservation. Selective breeding practices target specific alleles to fix desirable traits, while preservation efforts aim to maintain a broad gene pool to prevent the loss of adaptive or culturally significant traits. In traditional landrace populations, many traits are governed by polygenic inheritance, where multiple genes collectively influence a characteristic such as resin production or flowering time.

The expression of a gene can be influenced by environmental factors and epigenetic modifications, but its underlying sequence remains a stable hereditary element. Advances in cannabis genomics have identified genes responsible for key biosynthetic pathways, including THCAS and CBDAS, which encode the enzymes that synthesize major cannabinoids. However, functional annotation of many cannabis genes remains incomplete, and gene-trait associations require further study.

References:

  • Hartl, D. L., & Ruvolo, M. (2012). Genetics: Analysis of Genes and Genomes. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Lynch, M., & Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates.

  • Alberts, B., et al. (2015). Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Science.

  • Laverty, K. U., et al. (2019). A physical and genetic map of Cannabis sativa identifies extensive rearrangements at the THC/CBD acid synthase loci. Genome Research, 29(1), 146–156.

  • Grassa, C. J., et al. (2021). A complete Cannabis chromosome assembly and adaptive admixture in modern cultivars. Genome Research, 31(3), 496–510.

Related terms: [DNA] | [Alleles] | [Genotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by National Cancer Institute

Locus

Definition: The specific, fixed position of a gene or genetic marker on a chromosome.

In cannabis and other diploid plants, a locus (plural: loci) refers to the chromosomal site where a particular gene or genetic element is located. Each locus may carry one allele from each parent, which together determine an organism’s genotype at that site. For example, the THCAS and CBDAS loci determine the biosynthetic pathway toward THC or CBD production, making them central to cannabinoid chemotype expression.

 

Loci are critical units in classical and molecular genetics, allowing breeders and geneticists to track inheritance, identify trait-linked genes, and perform marker-assisted selection. In landrace populations, loci often harbor high allelic diversity due to limited artificial selection and ongoing gene flow, which contributes to broader phenotypic variation and local adaptation.

Some loci exhibit complex interactions such as linkage disequilibrium or epistasis, where the expression of alleles at one locus depends on alleles at another. In breeding programs, accurately identifying loci linked to agronomic traits (such as flowering time, drought tolerance, or pathogen resistance) supports the development of stable cultivars while retaining valuable landrace traits.

References:

  • Weiblen, G. D., Wenger, J. P., Craft, K. J., ElSohly, M. A., Mehmedic, Z., Treiber, E. L., & Marks, M. D. (2015). Gene duplication and divergence affecting drug content in Cannabis sativa. New Phytologist, 208(4), 1241–1250.

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0133292.

  • Dufresnes, C., et al. (2017). Broad-scale phylogeographic structure of Cannabis in Eurasia reveals multiple independent domestications. bioRxiv, 093252.

  • Turner, S. D. (2014). qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and Manhattan plots. bioRxiv, 005165.

  • Kojoma, M., Seki, H., Yoshida, S., & Muranaka, T. (2006). DNA polymorphisms in Cannabis sativa L. Forensic Science International, 159(2-3), 132–140.

Related terms: [Alleles] | [Chromosomes] | [Genotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Allele.jpg

Alleles

Definition: An allele is a specific version of a gene that occupies a particular locus on a chromosome.

In diploid organisms such as Cannabis sativa, individuals inherit two alleles for each gene - one from each parent. These alleles may be identical (homozygous) or different (heterozygous), influencing trait expression depending on dominance relationships. For example, alleles can affect observable characteristics such as flower color, trichome density or cannabinoid biosynthesis.

In cannabis breeding, allelic variation plays a central role in trait selection and the fixation or segregation of desired phenotypes. Many traits, including THC or CBD dominance, result from the interaction of multiple alleles at one or more loci, making accurate genotyping essential for predicting outcomes. Some loci linked to cannabinoid synthesis have been partially characterized and used to identify major chemotype-determining alleles.

While the classical Mendelian model provides a foundational understanding of allele behavior, complex traits in cannabis often exhibit polygenic inheritance and epigenetic interactions, limiting the predictive power of single-locus models.

References:

  • Small, E. (2015). Cannabis: A Complete Guide. CRC Press.

  • Lynch, M., & Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates.

  • McPartland, J.M., et al. (2018). "Cannabis systematics at the levels of family, genus, and species." Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 3(1), 203–212.

  • Weiblen, G.D., et al. (2015). "Gene duplication and divergence affecting drug content in Cannabis sativa." New Phytologist, 208(4), 1241–1250.

Related terms: [DNA] | [Genes] | [Genotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Richard T

Homozygous

Definition: The genetic condition in which an organism has two identical alleles at a specific locus on homologous chromosomes.

In Cannabis sativa, a homozygous individual inherits the same allele from both parents for a given trait, resulting in genetic uniformity at that locus. This can influence visible characteristics such as leaf morphology, flowering time, or cannabinoid biosynthesis. For instance, a plant with two identical alleles for a gene regulating THCA synthase expression is homozygous at that locus and is more likely to produce consistent levels of THCA across environments.

Homozygosity is foundational to plant breeding because it reduces genetic variation for targeted traits, facilitates trait stabilisation across generations and enables the development of modern cultivars and inbred lines (IBLs). 

In landrace populations, homozygous loci may arise naturally through genetic drift, limited population size, or local selection pressures that favor particular alleles. For example, in geographically isolated valleys or upland villages where cannabis populations experience minimal gene flow, specific adaptations (such as resistance to humidity, early flowering, or local pathogen tolerance) may become fixed. However, these pockets of homozygosity are usually embedded within a broader context of high heterozygosity. Landrace populations typically retain substantial genetic diversity due to occasional outcrossing, heterogeneous environments, and decentralized seed selection, all of which contribute to their adaptive flexibility and long-term resilience.

Excessive homozygosity, especially in artificially narrowed breeding pools, can lead to inbreeding depression. This manifests as reduced plant vigor, poor root development, delayed flowering, lower seed viability, or increased susceptibility to pests and pathogens. Such outcomes are particularly problematic in environments where resilience is critical, including outdoor or low-input cultivation systems. Maintaining a balance between homozygosity for trait fixation and heterozygosity for robustness is therefore a central challenge in breeding programs.

Molecular tools such as marker-assisted selection (MAS) enable breeders to identify homozygous individuals for specific genetic markers linked to traits of interest. This allows for precise selection without waiting for full phenotypic expression or growing plants to maturity.

 

In cannabis, MAS has been used to track loci associated with sex expression, cannabinoid synthase genes, and pathogen resistance. By accelerating the identification of homozygous individuals with desirable alleles, MAS improves breeding efficiency and supports the creation of cultivars that are both uniform and tailored to specific environments or markets.

References:

  • Charlesworth, D., & Willis, J. H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(11), 783–796.

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0133292.

  • Acquaah, G. (2012). Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding. Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Collard, B. C. Y., & Mackill, D. J. (2008). Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363(1491), 557–572.

Related terms: [Heterozygous] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1047972-2.jpg

Heterozygous

Definition: The genetic condition in which an organism has two different alleles at a specific locus on homologous chromosomes.

In Cannabis sativa, a heterozygous individual inherits distinct alleles from each parent for a given trait, resulting in genetic variation at that locus. This can influence traits such as cannabinoid profile, flowering time, or stress resistance. For example, a plant with one allele for high THCA expression and another for CBDA synthase activity is heterozygous at that locus and may exhibit an intermediate or mixed chemotype, depending on gene regulation.

Heterozygosity is a hallmark of genetically diverse populations and is especially prominent in open-pollinated landraces. In these populations, continual outcrossing, variable environments and decentralized seed-saving practices maintain high levels of heterozygosity across multiple loci. This genetic variability provides a reservoir of adaptive potential, enabling populations to respond flexibly to biotic and abiotic stressors over time.

In plant breeding, heterozygosity can confer several advantages. It underlies heterosis, or hybrid vigor, where crosses between genetically distinct parents result in offspring that outperform either parent in traits such as biomass, yield, or disease tolerance. However, it also introduces variability across generations, which can complicate efforts to stabilise cultivars for uniform production.

In traditional farming contexts, this variability is often a strength, allowing farmers to select offspring that thrive under specific local conditions. In modern breeding programs, however, heterozygosity must be carefully managed to balance the benefits of robustness with the need for trait consistency. This often involves strategic crosses followed by recurrent selection or selfing to fix desirable alleles while retaining diversity at key loci.

Molecular tools such as SNP arrays and marker-assisted selection (MAS) allow breeders to detect heterozygous loci and monitor genetic segregation in breeding populations. These tools support the design of parental combinations, help track polygenic traits and facilitate the introgression of novel alleles without extensive phenotypic screening.

In cannabis, MAS has been used to identify heterozygous plants carrying recessive alleles for traits such as dwarfism, disease resistance, or minor cannabinoid expression, enabling more efficient selection and line development.

References:

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0133292.

  • Lynch, M., & Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates.

  • McPartland, J.M. (2018). Cannabis systematics at the levels of family, genus, and species. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 3(1), 203–212.

  • Chandra, S., et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  • de Meijer, E. P. M., et al. (2003). The inheritance of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. Euphytica, 137(3), 219–229.

Related terms: [Homozygous] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Esteban López

Heterosis

Definition: Heterosis is the phenomenon by which hybrid offspring exhibit greater vigor or performance than either parent.

In the context of Cannabis, heterosis (commonly referred to as hybrid vigor) describes enhanced traits such as biomass, cannabinoid yield, or growth rate in first-generation (F₁) hybrids resulting from crosses between genetically divergent parents. The biological basis of heterosis is not fully resolved but is widely attributed to mechanisms such as dominance (masking of deleterious recessive alleles), overdominance (superior performance of heterozygotes at certain loci), and epistasis (non-additive interactions between loci).

Heterosis is typically most pronounced in the F₁ generation and declines in subsequent generations due to genetic segregation and recombination. In breeding programs, it is often exploited through the creation of F₁ hybrids between inbred or genetically distinct populations. However, among open-pollinated landraces, where high levels of heterozygosity and genotypic diversity are common, the concept is more complex: many plants already exhibit intrinsic heterotic effects within populations, blurring the distinction between “hybrid” and “pure” lines.

Hybrid vigor does not guarantee agronomic desirability, especially if key traits such as flowering time or cannabinoid profile segregate unpredictably in later generations.

While heterosis can temporarily boost performance, it may also mask underlying genetic weaknesses, limiting long-term adaptability if hybrid lines are not stabilized or if selection pressure is relaxed.

Related terms: [Homozygous] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Sangharsh Lohakare

Heredity

Definition: The transmission of genetic information from parent plants to their offspring.

 

Heredity determines how traits such as plant height, leaf shape, cannabinoid profiles, flowering time, and pest resistance are passed through generations.

The scientific study of heredity began with Gregor Mendel in the 19th century. Mendel’s experiments with pea plants established the principles of inheritance, showing that traits are determined by discrete units (now called genes) that segregate and assort independently during reproduction. Mendelian laws form the basis for understanding how traits are inherited in cannabis and other plants.

Modern cannabis breeding relies on these principles to guide the selection and stabilization of desired traits.

References:

  1. Griffiths, A. J. F., et al. (2008). Introduction to Genetic Analysis. 9th Edition. W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN: 978-1429229432

  2. Mendel, G. (1866). Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden [Experiments on Plant Hybridization]. Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereins in Brünn, 4, 3–47. (English translation in Stern & Sherwood, 1966)

Related terms: [Genepool] | [Variation] | [Genotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

IMG_20241201_150959.jpg

Segregation

Definition: The separation of alleles during gamete formation, ensuring that each gamete receives only one allele from each homologous pair.

Segregation is a fundamental principle of Mendelian inheritance, describing how alleles for a given gene are distributed into gametes during meiosis. In diploid Cannabis, each plant carries two alleles at each locus, one from each parent. During meiosis, these alleles segregate into separate gametes, so that offspring inherit one allele per locus from each parent.

This process underlies the predictable genetic ratios observed in the progeny of controlled crosses. For example, when heterozygous plants are selfed or crossed, segregation results in a mix of homozygous and heterozygous offspring, enabling selection for desired traits such as cannabinoid profile, flowering time, or pest resistance. In landrace populations, segregation contributes to phenotypic diversity by reshuffling alleles each generation, particularly in outcrossing, open-pollinated systems.

While Mendelian segregation applies broadly, deviations can occur due to factors such as genetic linkage, meiotic drive, or chromosomal abnormalities. In breeding programs, understanding segregation patterns allows for accurate prediction of trait inheritance and the development of stable cultivars through repeated selection and inbreeding.

References:

  • Mendel, G. (1866). Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden [Experiments on Plant Hybridization]. Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereins in Brünn, 4, 3–47. (English translation in Stern & Sherwood, 1966)

  • Griffiths, A. J. F., et al. (2008). Introduction to Genetic Analysis. 9th Edition. W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN: 978-1429229432

  • Hartwell, L. H., et al. (2018). Genetics: From Genes to Genomes. 6th Edition. McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN: 978-1259700903

  • Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th Edition. Longman Group. ISBN: 9780582243026

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

IMG_20241201_150959.jpg

Recombination

Definition: The exchange of genetic material between homologous chromosomes during meiosis, resulting in new allele combinations in offspring.

In Cannabis, recombination occurs during prophase I of meiosis, when homologous chromosomes align and undergo crossing over. This process breaks and rejoins segments of DNA, allowing alleles at different loci to be reshuffled independently of their original parental configurations.

 

Recombination is a major driver of genetic diversity within landrace populations, especially when paired with open pollination and large population sizes. It enables selection to act on novel trait combinations and can break up deleterious linkage blocks that would otherwise limit adaptability.

In landrace preservation and breeding, recombination plays a critical role in maintaining population viability over generations. High rates of recombination, combined with extensive heterozygosity, help explain the rich phenotypic diversity seen in many traditional cannabis populations. However, the effects of recombination can be constrained by physical linkage, genetic bottlenecks, or inbreeding, which reduce the range of possible allele combinations.

While recombination is largely random in location and outcome, its frequency varies across the genome and is influenced by chromosomal structure and sequence motifs. Recombination hotspots have been identified in other plant species, but are poorly mapped in Cannabis due to limited cytogenetic research and incomplete genome assemblies.

 

Recombination is distinct from mutation, which introduces new genetic variation at the nucleotide level, and from segregation, which refers to the separation of alleles into gametes without necessarily producing novel combinations.

References:

  • Mandolino, G., & Carboni, A. (2004). Potential of marker-assisted selection in hemp genetic improvement. Euphytica, 140(1–2), 107–120.

  • van Bakel, H., et al. (2011). The draft genome and transcriptome of Cannabis sativa. Genome Biology, 12(10), R102.

  • Otto, S. P., & Lenormand, T. (2002). Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3(4), 252–261.

  • Gaut, B. S., et al. (2007). Recombination: an underappreciated factor in the evolution of plant genomes. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8(1), 77–84.

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

IMG_20241201_150959.jpg

Mutation

Definition: Any heritable change in the DNA sequence of an organism’s genome.

Mutations are fundamental sources of genetic variation, arising when the nucleotide sequence of DNA is altered by replication errors, environmental factors, or transposable elements. These changes can occur at various scales, from single base substitutions to insertions, deletions, or chromosomal rearrangements. In Cannabis, mutations may lead to shifts in chemotype, morphology, sexual expression, or flowering traits, particularly when preserved through inbreeding or clonal propagation.

 

While most mutations are neutral or deleterious, a small proportion may confer advantageous traits under specific ecological or cultural conditions. In landrace populations, mutations that align with environmental pressures or farmer preferences may become fixed over time, contributing to local adaptation. Conversely, high mutation rates in isolated or bottlenecked populations can lead to the accumulation of deleterious alleles, a phenomenon known as mutational load.

 

The distinction between somatic and germline mutations is critical in cultivation. Somatic mutations affect only the tissues of a specific plant and are not heritable unless propagated vegetatively, as seen in clonally maintained cannabis cultivars. Germline mutations, by contrast, occur in reproductive cells and are passed on through seed.

 

Mutation rates in Cannabis sativa are not precisely established but are thought to be consistent with other outcrossing diploid plants. The term "mutation" may also be used colloquially or anecdotally in cannabis culture to describe visually striking or unusual phenotypes. However, without molecular confirmation, such traits may result from epigenetic changes or environmental stress responses rather than true genetic mutation.

​References

  • Lodish, H., et al. (2021). Molecular Cell Biology (9th ed.). W.H. Freeman.

  • Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  • Charlesworth, D., & Willis, J. H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(11), 783–796.

  • Lynch, M., et al. (1995). Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. American Naturalist, 146(4), 489–518.

  • Ness, R. W., et al. (2012). Estimate of the spontaneous mutation rate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Communications, 3, 1241.

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Testalize.me

Genotype

Definition: The heritable genetic makeup of an organism, determined by the specific sequence of alleles at one or more loci.

In Cannabis sativa, a plant’s genotype refers to its specific combination of alleles inherited from parent plants. These genetic instructions influence traits such as cannabinoid biosynthesis, flowering time and resistance to stressors. While the genotype determines potential, its expression depends on environmental conditions, giving rise to the phenotype.

In landrace populations, genotypes reflect long-term interaction with local ecological and cultural conditions. Limited artificial selection and ongoing gene flow often preserve a range of allelic combinations within a given population. This variation allows individual plants to exhibit different traits while still belonging to a shared regional genepool.

Molecular techniques such as whole-genome sequencing and marker-assisted selection enable direct identification of genotypes, allowing researchers to distinguish between visually similar plants with different underlying genetic profiles. However, in traditional cultivation settings, genotype is inferred indirectly through phenotypic traits and patterns of inheritance.

The term genotype is distinct from chemotype, which classifies plants by their dominant phytochemical expression, and phenotype, which describes observable traits shaped by the interaction of genotype and environment.

​References:

  • Lynch, R. C., et al. (2016). Genomic and Chemical Diversity in Cannabis. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 35(5–6), 349–363.

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The Genetic Structure of Marijuana and Hemp. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0133292.

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A Classification of Endangered High-THC Cannabis Domesticates and Their Wild Relatives. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 5(4), 243–258.

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by National Cancer Institute

Variation

Definition: Variation refers to the differences observed among individuals within a species.

 

In cannabis, variation manifests as the difference in traits such as plant height, leaf shape, flowering time, cannabinoid and terpene profiles, disease resistance and overall morphology.

Variation arises from two main sources:

  • Genetic variation: differences in DNA sequences among individuals, caused by mutations, recombination during sexual reproduction, and the reshuffling of alleles. Genetic variation forms the raw material for selection in both natural evolution and breeding programs.
     

  • Environmental variation: differences caused by external (epigenetic) factors such as climate, soil composition, light intensity, nutrient availability and cultivation practices. Even plants with identical genetic makeup (genotypes) can display differences in appearance or chemical profiles due to environmental influences, a phenomenon known as phenotypic plasticity.
     

In cannabis breeding and conservation, understanding variation is crucial for selecting and stabilizing desirable traits, preserving genetic diversity within landrace populations, identifying unique chemotypes for medicinal or industrial applications and adapting cultivars to different environments.

 

Modern genetic tools like DNA sequencing and molecular markers help quantify variation and trace relationships between populations, revealing both hidden genetic diversity and the impacts of hybridization.

References:

  • Griffiths, A. J. F., et al. (2008). Introduction to Genetic Analysis. 9th Edition. W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN: 978-1429229432

  • Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press. ISBN: 978-0520270480

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.144.46700

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLoS One, 10(8), e0133292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133292

Related terms: [Landrace] | [Hybrid] | [Genotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by National Cancer Institute

Adaptation

Definition: The process by which a population becomes better suited to its environment through heritable changes in genetic composition.

Adaptation in plants refers to the evolutionary adjustment of genetic traits that enhance survival and reproductive success under specific environmental conditions. In cannabis, local adaptation arises from long-term selection pressures such as climate, photoperiod, pathogens, and cultural practices. These pressures influence traits including flowering time, drought tolerance, disease resistance and phytochemical expression.

Adaptation operates at the population level, typically over many generations and differs from phenotypic plasticity, which refers to environmentally induced changes within a single generation. Local landrace populations often exhibit signs of adaptation to distinct ecological zones, such as Himalayan foothill strains showing early flowering in response to shortened growing seasons, or tropical populations displaying resistance to humidity-related pathogens.

Ambiguities can arise when distinguishing between true genetic adaptation and the effects of human-mediated selection or gene flow. Moreover, adaptation does not imply genetic uniformity; rather, it may maintain or even promote diversity if multiple strategies enhance fitness in a variable environment.

Related terms: [Landrace] | [Hybrid] | [Genotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1037956.jpg

Phenotype

Definition: A phenotype is the complete set of observable characteristics expressed by an organism.

 

In cannabis, phenotypes encompass traits such as plant height, leaf shape, flowering time, trichome production, cannabinoid and terpene profiles, as well as responses to environmental conditions.

Phenotype results from the interaction between an organism’s genotype (its inherited genetic information) and environmental influences such as light, temperature, nutrients, soil conditions and cultivation practices. This interaction means that genetically identical cannabis plants can exhibit different phenotypes under varying growing conditions, a phenomenon known as phenotypic plasticity.

Griffiths et al. (2008) define phenotype as:

“Phenotype refers to the observable properties of an organism, including morphology, development, biochemical or physiological properties, and behavior.”

In cannabis breeding, phenotype evaluation is crucial for:

  • Selecting plants with desirable traits for propagation

  • Identifying unique chemotypes for medicinal or recreational markets

  • Understanding how cultivation environments shape plant expression

  • Distinguishing between cultivars, landraces, and hybrid populations based on observable traits

 

Modern genetic tools help breeders link specific genetic markers to phenotypic traits, improving the precision of selection and breeding strategies. However, environmental conditions remain a significant driver of how traits are expressed in cannabis plants.

References:

  1. Griffiths, A. J. F., et al. (2008). Introduction to Genetic Analysis. 9th Edition. W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN: 978-1429229432

  2. Small, E. (2015). Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. Botanical Review, 81(3), 189–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9312-8

  3. Sultan, S. E. (2000). Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends in Plant Science, 5(12), 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01797-0

  4. Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLoS One, 10(8), e0133292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133292

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1048048.jpg

Chemotype

Definition: A chemotype is a classification based on the chemical profile of an organism, particularly its secondary metabolites.

 

In cannabis, chemotypes are distinguished by the relative concentrations of cannabinoids (such as THC, CBD, and others) as well as terpenes and other bioactive compounds.

The term originates from phytochemistry, where it denotes chemically distinct entities within the same species that may be morphologically identical but differ in biochemical composition. In cannabis, plants sharing the same genotype can produce different chemotypes depending on environmental conditions, cultivation practices, and developmental stage, though genetic factors strongly influence the potential chemical profile.

 

Small and Beckstead (1973) first described cannabis chemotypes, identifying at least three major groups:

  • Chemotype I - high THC, low CBD (drug-type)

  • Chemotype II - intermediate levels of both THC and CBD

  • Chemotype III - low THC, high CBD (fiber-type hemp)

These groupings have since been refined as analytical techniques have improved, revealing greater complexity in cannabinoid and terpene profiles. Modern breeding has produced cultivars with highly specific chemotypes tailored for medicinal, industrial or recreational applications.

References:

  • Small, E., & Beckstead, H. D. (1973). Common cannabinoid phenotypes in 350 stocks of Cannabis. Lloydia, 36(2), 144–165.

  • Small, E. (2015). Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. Botanical Review, 81(3), 189–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9312-8

  • Bruneton, J. (1999). Pharmacognosy, Phytochemistry, Medicinal Plants. 2nd Edition. Lavoisier Publishing. ISBN: 9781898298609

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLoS One, 10(8), e0133292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133292

Related terms: [Genotype] | [Phenotype] | [Chemistry] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1037956.jpg

Phenotypic plasticity

Definition: The capacity of a single genotype to produce different phenotypes in response to environmental conditions.

 

In cannabis, phenotypic plasticity allows genetically identical plants to vary in traits such as stature, leaf morphology, flowering time, and secondary metabolite expression depending on variables like altitude, photoperiod, temperature, water availability, and nutrient levels. This adaptability enables landrace populations to persist across ecologically diverse habitats, especially in regions with fluctuating or extreme conditions.

 

Phenotypic plasticity is a central factor in interpreting morphological and chemotypic differences within genepools. For example, tall, narrow-leafed plants from one elevation may appear broad-leafed and compact when grown under different light intensity or nutrient regimes. Such environmental modulation does not necessarily indicate genetic divergence. This makes plasticity a key consideration in landrace conservation, breeding, and phenotypic evaluation.

Plastic responses can be adaptive or non-adaptive and they may involve changes in growth, development, or physiological function. Not all traits exhibit equal plasticity; some are developmentally canalized or genetically constrained.

In cannabis research, distinguishing between plastic variation and heritable traits requires controlled common garden or reciprocal transplant experiments. Without this distinction, morphological variation may be misinterpreted as evidence of hybridization, domestication history, or genetic distance.

Phenotypic plasticity also interacts with selection. If plastic traits confer a fitness advantage in a given environment, they may become genetically assimilated over generations.

References:

  • Griffiths, A. J. F., et al. (2008). Introduction to Genetic Analysis. 9th Edition. W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN: 978-1429229432

  • Small, E. (2015). Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. Botanical Review, 81(3), 189–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9312-8

  • Sultan, S. E. (2000). Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends in Plant Science, 5(12), 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01797-0

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLoS One, 10(8), e0133292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133292

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001661.jpg

Gene pool

Definition: A gene pool refers to the complete set of genetic variation present within a defined group of organisms.

 

In plants, it encompasses all alleles at all loci among individuals of a population, species, or taxonomic group. The concept is crucial for understanding biodiversity, breeding potential and conservation priorities.

The term “gene pool” was popularised in plant breeding and evolutionary biology to classify genetic diversity into hierarchical levels: 

  • Primary gene pool: individuals or populations that freely interbreed and produce fertile offspring. In Cannabis sativa, this includes all domesticated and wild-type plants, which are fully interfertile despite morphological and chemical differences. 
     

  • Secondary gene pool: taxa that can cross with the primary gene pool but only with difficulty or reduced fertility in hybrids. For Cannabis, no recognised secondary gene pool exists, as it is a monotypic genus.
     

  • Tertiary gene pool;: taxa with which crossing requires advanced techniques (e.g., embryo rescue) and whose hybrids are often sterile. Again, no tertiary gene pool is known for Cannabis.

 

In cannabis research and breeding, “gene pool” is also used informally to denote the collective genetic diversity associated with a geographic region, cultivation tradition, or landrace lineage. For example, McPartland and Small refer to distinct South Asian and Central Asian gene pools reflecting divergent morphological, chemical, and genetic traits among unhybridised populations. These regional gene pools are the reservoirs of genetic traits such as disease resistance, specific terpene profiles, or cannabinoid ratios that breeders may draw upon for future cultivars

 

However, widespread hybridisation in the past fifty years has increasingly homogenised cannabis gene pools, threatening the conservation of unique landrace populations. Loss of distinct gene pools diminishes the crop’s evolutionary potential and genetic resources available for breeding. 

From a conservation perspective, gene pools are central to identifying priorities for preserving biodiversity. The Food and Agriculture Organisation emphasises gene pool diversity as a safeguard for breeding resilience against pests, diseases and climate change.

References:

  • Harlan, J. R., & de Wet, J. M. J. (1971). Toward a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon, 20(4), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/1218252

  • Small, E. (1972). Interfertility and chromosomal uniformity in Cannabis. Canadian Journal of Botany, 50(9), 1947–1949. https://doi.org/10.1139/b72-248

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.144.46700

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLoS One, 10(8), e0133292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133292

  • FAO. (2010). The Second Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome: FAO.

Related terms: [Landrace] | [Hybrid] | [Genotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1048161.jpg

Cline

Definition: A cline is a spatial gradient in the mean value of a trait or in allele frequencies across a geographic or environmental axis.

Clines arise when dispersal and gene flow interact with spatially varying selection, producing gradual shifts rather than discrete breaks. Classic population-genetic theory shows that the slope and width of a cline reflect the balance between selection strength and dispersal distance, providing a way to infer evolutionary processes from geographic patterns. 

 

In practice, clines can occur in morphology, phenology, or chemotype along latitude, altitude, moisture, or photoperiod gradients and they are common where outcrossing plants with wind-dispersed pollen exchange genes among nearby demes. Broad syntheses link clines to geographic variation and speciation dynamics, while steep, sigmoidal clines concentrated in contact zones are often treated as hybrid zones maintained by selection against mismatched genotypes

Ambiguities: Not all spatial gradients are genetic. Apparent clines can be generated by phenotypic plasticity or sampling bias and distinguishing these from heritable clines requires common-garden or genomic evidence. Hybridization can also superimpose stepped transitions on otherwise smooth gradients, complicating inference. 

References:

  • Huxley, J. (1938). Clines: an Auxiliary Taxonomic Principle. Nature, 142, 219–220.

  • Haldane, J. B. S. (1948). The theory of a cline. Journal of Genetics, 48(3), 277–284.

  • Slatkin, M. (1973). Gene flow and selection in a cline. Genetics, 75(4), 733–756.

  • Barton, N. H., & Hewitt, G. M. (1985). Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 113–148.

  • Endler, J. A. (1977). Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines. Princeton University Press.

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1048161.jpg

Deme

Definition: A local interbreeding population within a species that shares a distinct gene pool and occupies a defined ecological or geographic space.

 

In biology, a deme refers to a group of individuals of the same species that interbreed more often among themselves than with members of other groups, resulting in partial genetic differentiation.

 

Demes are the basic units of population structure and evolution: they are shaped by selection, drift, migration and mutation. Local adaptation frequently emerges at the level of the deme, where interaction with specific ecological conditions or cultural practices; for instance, selection for trichome density or flowering time in cannabis results in distinct phenotypic and genotypic profiles.

Deme size and gene flow influence evolutionary trajectories, including the rate and mode of speciation. Small, semi-isolated demes may undergo stronger genetic drift and faster fixation of traits, sometimes leading to rapid sympatric speciation.

 

In landrace cannabis, demes correspond to valley-scale or village-level populations maintained through limited seed exchange, cultivation under selection and relative reproductive isolation.

Related terms: [Landrace] | [Hybrid] | [Genotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001691.jpg

Genetic drift

Definition: The random fluctuation of allele frequencies in a population due to chance events across generations.

Genetic drift is a key evolutionary mechanism that alters the genetic composition of populations independently of natural selection. It is particularly influential in small populations, where stochastic effects can lead to the fixation or loss of alleles regardless of their adaptive value. Unlike selection, which favors alleles that confer increased fitness, drift is a non-directional process driven by sampling error during reproduction.

 

In Cannabis, genetic drift may significantly shape landrace populations maintained by smallholder farmers or surviving in isolated environments. For example, when only a limited number of seeds are replanted each season (whether by tradition, necessity, or accident) allele frequencies may shift unpredictably, potentially reducing genetic diversity over time. This effect is amplified by factors such as population bottlenecks, founder events, or strong interannual selection of just a few maternal plants.

While drift may erode rare or neutral alleles, it can also generate divergence between subpopulations, contributing to local differentiation and, over longer timescales, speciation. In conservation and breeding contexts, maintaining large, well-mixed populations is critical to buffer against the effects of drift and preserve genotypic and phenotypic diversity.

References:

  • Griffiths, A. J. F., et al. (2008). Introduction to Genetic Analysis. 9th Edition. W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN: 978-1429229432

  • Hartwell, L. H., et al. (2018). Genetics: From Genes to Genomes. 6th Edition. McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN: 978-1259700903

  • Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th Edition. Longman Group. ISBN: 9780582243026

  • FAO. (2010). The Second Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome: FAO.

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Matteo Paganelli

Gene FLOw

Definition: The movement of genetic material between populations through pollen, seed, or human-mediated transfer.

Gene flow occurs when pollen from one population fertilizes individuals in another, introducing new alleles into the recipient genepool. This process shapes the genetic structure of populations over time, influencing diversity, adaptation and the stability of distinct landraces. As an obligate outcrosser with wind-dispersed pollen, Cannabis exhibits high potential for long-distance gene flow under natural and cultivated conditions.

In landrace systems, gene flow can help maintain regional coherence among isolated subpopulations, but it can also erode localized adaptation if incoming genes are maladaptive to the environment or farming system. This is particularly relevant in areas where traditional populations coexist with introduced hybrids or industrial cultivars. Historical evidence shows that extensive human movement of seed has mediated gene flow across Central and South Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.

Genomic studies have confirmed gene flow between drug-type and fiber-type cannabis as well as between domesticated and feral populations. In situ conservation efforts require careful attention to both the ecological and cultural contexts of gene flow to avoid unintentional hybridization and the loss of genetic integrity.

References:

  • McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–133.

  • Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2016). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  • Sawler, J., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0133292.

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Matteo Paganelli

GEnetic erosion

Definition: The progressive loss of genetic diversity within a species or population, often driven by environmental change, habitat loss, or agricultural homogenization.

Genetic erosion refers to the decline in allelic richness and genotypic variability within a population over time. In the context of landrace crops, this typically occurs when traditional varieties are displaced by high-yielding or commercially standardized cultivars, or when ecological disruption reduces the number of viable breeding individuals. The resulting contraction of the population’s genepool limits its adaptive capacity, increases vulnerability to pests, pathogens, and climate fluctuations, and weakens the potential for future crop improvement through selection or hybridization.

In cannabis, genetic erosion is especially acute in regions undergoing legal, economic, or cultural transformation, where localized landraces are replaced by imported hybrid seeds or clones. These processes often occur without preservation efforts, leading to irreversible loss of historically adapted lineages. Genetic erosion can be both passive (via drift or isolation) and active, through direct replacement or suppression of traditional cultivation practices.

Although distinct from genetic drift, which refers to random fluctuations in allele frequencies, genetic erosion often includes drift as a mechanism, especially in small or fragmented populations. It also overlaps with concepts like demographic extinction and extinction by introgression, depending on the driver and context.

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Ryan Lange

Bottleneck effect

Definition: The sharp reduction in genetic diversity that occurs when a population undergoes a severe and temporary decrease in size.

The bottleneck effect arises when a population is drastically reduced by events such as habitat destruction, disease, human intervention, or extreme climatic conditions. In small populations, genetic drift plays a disproportionate role, often leading to the random loss or fixation of alleles. Once the population recovers in size, the gene pool reflects only the genetic variation present in the few surviving individuals, which may not be representative of the original population.

In Cannabis, the bottleneck effect has practical consequences for conservation, breeding, and landrace preservation. Historical examples include colonial-era prohibitions on cannabis cultivation, post-Green Revolution replacement of local varieties and modern enforcement-driven eradication programs. Each of these can dramatically reduce the effective population size of locally adapted cultivars, resulting in reduced heterozygosity, inbreeding and the loss of rare alleles.

For landrace populations, especially those cultivated in marginal or remote agroecological zones, bottlenecks may occur due to factors like drought, war, or market collapse. In some cases, the continued propagation of a small number of maternal lines over successive seasons can compound this effect, even in the absence of a visible crisis. This can have long-term implications for resilience, especially if selection is narrowed around yield, potency, or visual traits.

The bottleneck effect is closely related to the founder effect, but differs in that the population reduction is caused by a contraction, not colonization.

References:

  1. Griffiths, A. J. F., et al. (2008). Introduction to Genetic Analysis. 9th Edition. W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN: 978-1429229432

  2. Hartwell, L. H., et al. (2018). Genetics: From Genes to Genomes. 6th Edition. McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN: 978-1259700903

  3. Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th Edition. Longman Group. ISBN: 9780582243026

  4. McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis (Cannabis sativa subsp. indica) domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.144.46700

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Thiago Patriota

Founder effect

Definition: The change in allele frequencies and reduction of genetic diversity that occur when a new population is established by a very small number of founders. 

Founder events are strong sampling episodes. A few seeds or cuttings carry only a subset of the source gene pool, so rare alleles are often lost, heterozygosity declines and drift dominates early generations.

 

In domesticated and feral plants this can happen when a farmer starts a field from a handful of mothers, when seed moves with trade or migration, or when a stray stand of cannabis naturalizes.

 

Multiple independent introductions and subsequent gene flow from the parent population can partially restore variation, but outcomes depend on numbers, timing and mating structure.

 

Serial founder events during stepwise range expansion can create clines, allele surfing and pronounced among-population differentiation even without selection

For landrace conservation and seed increases, founder effects are avoided by maximizing effective population size at each regeneration, mixing seed from many maternal families and avoiding single-plant seed increases. Otherwise, lines drift toward inbreeding, reduced resilience and idiosyncratic chemotypes that do not represent the source deme

Ambiguity: usage of the term varies. Some authors treat the founder effect as a special case of a bottleneck associated specifically with colonization, while others use the terms interchangeably. In practice the processes often co-occur, but serial founder dynamics during range expansion are a distinct, well-described pattern. 

References:

  • Ellstrand, N. C., & Elam, D. R. (1993). Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 24, 217–242.

  • Nei, M., Maruyama, T., & Chakraborty, R. (1975). The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29, 1–10.

  • Dlugosch, K. M., & Parker, I. M. (2008). Founding events in species invasions: Genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Molecular Ecology, 17, 431–449.

  • Excoffier, L., Foll, M., & Petit, R. J. (2009). Genetic consequences of range expansions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 481–501.

Related terms: [Genetic Drift] | [Founder Effect] | [Inbreeding Depression] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

DJI_0648.jpg

Population Size

Definition: The number of individuals in a defined population, distinguished as census size (N) and effective population size (Ne), the latter being the number of breeding individuals that transmit genes to the next generation. 

Census size (N) is a headcount. It is useful for agronomy and logistics but does not, by itself, describe how genetic variation is retained across generations. In genetics and breeding, Ne is the quantity that governs the rates of genetic drift and inbreeding. Ne is always smaller than N because of unequal sex ratios, variance in reproductive success, temporal fluctuations, overlapping generations and population structure.

 

In both wild growing and cultivated cannabis, several common features depress Ne even when fields look large: variance in seed or pollen contribution, uneven sex ratios from male roguing, bottlenecks during eradication or seed downsizing, founder events from small seed lots and oscillations in field size across seasons.

Useful approximations are straightforward. With separate sexes,
Ne ≈ 4NmNf/(Nm + Nf), where Nm and Nf are the numbers of breeding males and females. Across years with fluctuating N, the long-term Ne is well approximated by the harmonic mean of population sizes, so short “thin” years dominate genetic outcomes.

 

A small Ne has predictable consequences: stronger drift, higher inbreeding, and faster loss of rare alleles that may underwrite local adaptation. In breeding programs that lean on a few elite parents, Ne can be dangerously low despite thousands of plants in production. In contrast, landrace systems with wide pollen flow and seed exchange often maintain higher Ne, preserving adaptive variation.

Management benchmarks are widely cited in conservation genetics. To limit near-term inbreeding load, maintain Ne ≳ 100. To retain adaptive potential over the long term, aim for Ne ≳ 1000. These thresholds are debated and different estimators of Ne (inbreeding, variance, coalescent) capture different time scales, so methods should be reported alongside values. 

References:

  • Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97–159.

  • Crow, J. F., & Kimura, M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row.

  • Wang, J., Santiago, E., & Caballero, A. (2016). Prediction and estimation of effective population size. Heredity, 117, 193–206.

  • Frankham, R., Bradshaw, C. J. A., & Brook, B. W. (2014). Genetics in conservation management: revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules. Biological Conservation, 170, 56–63.

  • Allendorf, F. W., & Luikart, G. (2007). Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Blackwell.

  • Frankham, R. (2014). 50/500 rules need upward revision to 100/1000. Biological Conservation, 176, 286–288.

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Phenotype] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

DJI_0648.jpg

Inbreeding depression

Definition: Reduction in fitness that occurs when related individuals mate, increasing homozygosity and exposing recessive deleterious alleles.

In outcrossing plants, inbreeding depression typically manifests as lowered vigor, fertility, seed viability and survival. The prevailing genetic cause is the expression of recessive deleterious mutations when they become homozygous, a view that also explains the converse pattern of heterosis in crosses between divergent lines.

Magnitude varies across traits and life stages. Early-acting lethal mutations can be purged by selection during repeated selfing, yet substantial late-acting load remains, especially in predominantly outcrossing species. In plants, the severity of inbreeding depression correlates with mating system, being strongest in obligate outcrossers, like Cannabis Sativa L.

Environmental context matters. Meta-analysis shows inbreeding depression commonly intensifies under stress, which amplifies fitness losses in inbred lineages.

For conservation and breeding, the implications are direct: maintain large, well-mixed effective population sizes, avoid repeated close matings, and regenerate seed from broad parental sets. Wild and cultivated populations measured under natural conditions frequently exhibit moderate to high inbreeding depression in fitness traits, underscoring these management priorities.

References:

  • Charlesworth, D., & Willis, J. H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(11), 783–796.

  • Keller, L. F., & Waller, D. M. (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17(5), 230–241.

  • Husband, B. C., & Schemske, D. W. (1996). Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution, 50(1), 54–70.

  • Armbruster, P., & Reed, D. H. (2005). Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity, 95(3), 235–242.

  • Crnokrak, P., & Roff, D. A. (1999). Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity, 83(3), 260–270.

Related terms: [Population Size] | [Genetic Drift] | [Heterosis] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001644.jpg

GEOGRAPHY

Spatial factors and climate regimes that structure adaptation, phenology and population connectivity in landrace cannabis.

Geography sets the boundary conditions for landrace evolution and management. Climate classifications and ecoregions provide the scaffolding for comparing sites, interpreting phenotypes and planning conservation across landscapes. Köppen climate types and agroecological zones are practical baselines for linking rainfall seasonality, temperature envelopes and humidity to cultivation calendars and disease pressure.

Latitude governs daylength, which sets photoperiodic induction and therefore flowering cycles and life history strategy. Elevation modifies temperature, vapor pressure deficit and UV exposure, which in turn shift maturation windows, resin traits and pathogen dynamics. In monsoon climates, onset and withdrawal of rains constrain sowing, sex expression management and harvest timing. Local topography, including aspect, slope and rainshadow effects, creates microclimates that fragment or concentrate suitable niches within short distances.

Geography is not static, movement across space is important. Valleys, passes and river corridors act as conduits for human seed exchange and wind-borne pollen, while mountain ranges and deserts act as partial barriers. These corridors and barriers shape clines along latitude, altitude and they mediate gene flow between village-scale demes and regional genepools. Integrating climate layers with ethnobotanical knowledge clarifies where flowering cycles, chemotypes and agronomic practices are locally adapted and where they are vulnerable to displacement by incoming hybrids.

ecoregion

Definition: A regional unit where ecosystems share a distinct assemblage of species and relatively uniform environmental conditions, delineated using multiple physical and biological factors. 

Ecoregions are mapped to capture coherent patterns in climate, landforms, soils, hydrology and biota at a management-relevant scale. Global and national frameworks use this unit for biodiversity assessment, conservation planning and ecological reporting. Examples include the WWF Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World, which group areas by characteristic communities and hierarchical national frameworks that integrate geology, physiography, vegetation, climate, soils, land use and hydrology.

 

Ecoregions sit between broad biomes and finer habitat units, providing a practical grain for comparing landrace cannabis populations exposed to similar seasonality, photoperiod regimes, disease pressures and selection gradients.

Ambiguities: Boundaries vary by method and purpose. Different frameworks weight criteria differently, produce different lines and update them as data improve. Ecoregions are heuristic units whose edges are often transitional rather than sharp. 

References:

  • Olson, D. M., et al. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on Earth. BioScience, 51(11), 933–938. Oxford Academic

  • Omernik, J. M., & Griffith, G. E. (2014). Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: Evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework. Environmental Management, 54(6), 1249–1266. US EPA

  • Bailey, R. G. (2005). Identifying ecoregion boundaries. Environmental Management, 34(Suppl 1), S14–S26. link.springer.com

  • Dinerstein, E., et al. (2017). An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. BioScience, 67(6), 534–545. Oxford Academic

Related terms: [Agroecological zone] | [Microclimate] | [Appellation] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

0e7b97d40f7b3f1b0073352ce7094da5-3173901201_edited.jpg

Koppen Climate type

Definition: An empirical category in the Köppen–Geiger classification that groups regions by thresholds of mean monthly temperature and precipitation to approximate natural vegetation patterns. 

Köppen climate types provide a compact climatic envelope for field planning and interpretation. For landrace cannabis related work they help anticipate thermal limits, rainfall seasonality, humidity loads, and frost risk that shape sowing windows, disease pressure and maturation timing. They complement, but do not replace, latitude-driven photoperiod and altitude-driven considerations.

The system organizes climates into five principal groups with lettered subtypes: tropical (A), arid (B), temperate (C), snow or boreal (D), and polar (E). Boundaries are set by simple precipitation and temperature criteria and by the seasonality of moisture and heat, including monsoon and dry-season systems. 

Ambiguities and updates: Köppen thresholds are vegetation-oriented and coarse. They do not capture microclimates, complex topography, or year-to-year variability. Competing revisions adjust mid-latitude boundaries and moisture rules, notably the Trewartha variant. High-resolution global maps now exist at ~1 km and show that class boundaries are shifting with recent climate change and that different datasets yield small but consequential differences in type assignment. 

References:

  • Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006). World Map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift.

  • Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

  • Belda, M., Holtanová, E., Halenka, T., & Kalvová, J. (2014). Climate classification revisited: From Köppen to Trewartha. Climate Research.

  • Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., McVicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A., & Wood, E. F. (2018). Present and future Köppen–Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific Data.

  • Köppen, W., & Geiger, R. (1936). Das geographische System der Klimate. In Handbuch der Klimatologie.

Related terms: [Agroecological Zone] | [Photoperiod] | [Ecoregion] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

0e7b97d40f7b3f1b0073352ce7094da5-3173901201_edited.jpg

Agro-ecological zone

Definition: Land-resource mapping unit defined by integrated climate, soil, and terrain characteristics, used to appraise agricultural potentials and constraints; typically parameterized by length of growing period and thermal regime.

Agroecological zoning groups areas that share comparable growing-period patterns, temperature profiles and soil mapping units so that crop requirements and land qualities can be matched to estimate suitability, attainable yields and management needs.

 

In the FAO’s Agroecological Zone (AEZ) framework, the growing period is derived from a water-balance comparison of rainfall and evapotranspiration, while thermal zones summarize heat availability during that period; together with soils, these define the core biophysical envelope for cropping systems. 

In the context of landrace Cannabis, AEZs provide the baseline for interpreting photoperiod exposure, onset and cessation of monsoon rains, disease pressure linked to humidity and temperature and feasible sowing–harvest calendars. They support cross-site comparison without collapsing local context and they help separate heritable adaptation from management or site effects when evaluating accessions and planning seed increases

References:

  • Soil Resources, Management and Conservation Service, FAO Land and Water Development Division. (1996). Agro-ecological zoning: Guidelines. FAO Soils Bulletin 73. Rome: FAO.

  • Fischer, G., Nachtergaele, F. O., Prieler, S., Teixeira, E., Tóth, G., van Velthuizen, H., Verelst, L., & Wiberg, D. (2012). Global Agro-ecological Zones (GAEZ v3.0): Model Documentation. IIASA, Laxenburg, and FAO, Rome.

  • FAO & IIASA. (2021). Global Agro-Ecological Zones v4: Model Documentation. Rome: FAO.

Related terms: [Climate Type] | [Photoperiod] | [Monsoon] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Adolfo Félix

Latitude 

Definition: Angular distance north or south of the equator, measured along a meridian from 0° at the equator to 90° at the poles on a defined reference ellipsoid.

Latitude sets the annual daylength regime by controlling solar altitude and the timing of sunrise and sunset, which in turn governs photoperiodic induction and flowering schedules in outcrossing crops like cannabis.

 

Simple, well-validated astronomical models express daylength as a function of latitude and day of year, and are widely used in ecology and agronomy.

 

Within this glossary, latitude is treated as a primary control on photoperiod and life history.

For photoperiod-sensitive landraces, small latitude shifts can move sowing and harvest windows by weeks, alter sexual expression and change mold pressure by shifting maturation into wetter or drier parts of the monsoon.

Ambiguity: several latitude definitions exist. Geodetic latitude is the angle between the ellipsoid normal and the equatorial plane and is the standard in mapping and GPS. Geocentric latitude is measured to Earth’s center. Values differ slightly because Earth is an oblate ellipsoid.

References:

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., & Moritz, H. (2006). Physical Geodesy. Springer.

  • Forsythe, W. C., Rykiel Jr., E. J., Stahl, R. S., Wu, H., & Schoolfield, R. M. (1995). A model comparison for daylength as a function of latitude and day of year. Ecological Modelling, 80, 87–95.

  • Thomas, B., & Vince-Prue, D. (1997). Photoperiodism in Plants. Academic Press.

  • Chandra, S., Lata, H., & ElSohly, M. A. (Eds.). (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

Related terms: [Photoperiod] | [Critical Photoperiod] | [Cline] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Ivana Cajina

Photoperiod

Definition: The length of daylight and darkness experienced at a location within a 24-hour cycle, varying systematically with latitude and season.

 

Daylength or photoperiod is a predictable signal that structures plant phenology and field calendars. It can be computed from latitude and day of year using standard formulas, with results closely matching observed daylengths. In plants, photoperiodic timekeeping integrates phytochrome signaling with the circadian clock, which effectively measures night length to gate developmental switches such as flowering.

Cannabis is a quantitative short-day species. Cannabis populations accelerate floral induction as nights lengthen after midsummer, with cultivar-specific thresholds that define a critical photoperiod.

Photoperiod sensitivity shows clear geographic patterning: high-latitude lineages tend to flower rapidly as days shorten to escape frost, while equatorial populations, exposed to near-constant daylengths, often flower more slowly and are less sensitive to small photoperiod shifts. Breeding has also produced day-neutral “autoflowering” types that initiate flowering by age rather than daylength, a trait now genetically mapped and used to tailor crops to diverse environments.

 

Photoperiod influences plant stature and internode length, biomass allocation within inflorescences, cannabinoid accumulation windows, and outdoor harvest timing that shapes yield and chemical profiles.

References:

  1. Forsythe, W. C., Rykiel, E. J., Stahl, R. S., Wu, H., & Schoolfield, R. M. (1995). A model comparison for daylength as a function of latitude and day of year. Ecological Modelling, 80, 87–95. ResearchGateNASA Technical Reports Server

  2. Thomas, B., & Vince-Prue, D. (1997). Photoperiodism in Plants. Academic Press. ScienceDirect

  3. Lisson, S. N., Mendham, N. J., & Carberry, P. S. (2000). Development of a hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) simulation model. 2. The flowering response of two hemp cultivars to photoperiod. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 40, 413–417. CSIRO Publishing+1

  4. Zhang, M., et al. (2021). Photoperiodic flowering response of essential oil, grain, and fiber hemp cultivars. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 694153. PMC

  5. McPartland, J. M., & Small, E. (2020). A classification of endangered high-THC cannabis domesticates and their wild relatives. PhytoKeys, 144, 81–112. ResearchGate

  6. Toth, J. A., et al. (2022). Identification and mapping of major-effect flowering time loci (Autoflower1 and Early1) in Cannabis sativa L. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 991680. Frontiers

Related terms: [Latitude] | [Critical Photoperiod] | [Agroecological Zone] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Ivana Cajina

Critical Photoperiod

Definition: The daylength threshold that induces or inhibits a photoperiodic response such as flowering, defined operationally for short-day plants as the maximum daylength permitting induction and for long-day plants as the minimum daylength required for induction. 

In plants, critical photoperiod, the effective cue is the length of the uninterrupted dark period and flowering responses hinge on whether night exceeds or falls below a critical duration, a principle established in classic photoperiodism experiments and refined by modern clock and photoreceptor studies. 

 

For Cannabis Sativa L., a short-day species, the critical photoperiod varies by cultivar and origin. Controlled-environment trials report approximate thresholds near 13.8–14 h for several European fiber cultivars, about 13 h 40 min to 14 h 40 min for an Australian line and 11–12 h for Thai material.

 

Minute differences in daylength, on the order of 15 min, can change induction outcomes in sensitive cultivars and civil twilight contributes to field responses. These thresholds interact with latitude and season: at lower latitudes, short natural daylengths can trigger premature flowering in high-latitude cultivars, reducing vegetative growth and biomass; growers adjust by selecting locally adapted germplasm or by using light-extension or night-interruption strategies. 

Ambiguities: “Critical” values are not species constants. They vary with genotype and can shift with temperature, plant developmental stage, light quality and whether twilight is included in daylength calculations.

References:

  • Thomas, B., & Vince-Prue, D. (1997). Photoperiodism in Plants. Academic Press.

  • Garner, W. W., & Allard, H. A. (1920). Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants. Journal of Agricultural Research.

  • Song, Y. H., Shim, J. S., & Imaizumi, T. (2015). Photoperiodic flowering: Time measurement mechanisms in leaves. Annual Review of Plant Biology.

  • Zhang, M., et al. (2021). Photoperiodic flowering response of essential oil, grain, and fiber hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars. Frontiers in Plant Science.

Related terms: [Photoperiod] | [Latitude] | [Flowering Cycle] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Ivana Cajina

Flowering Cycles

Definition: The seasonal timing and duration of floral induction, inflorescence development, and senescence in Cannabis, governed primarily by photoperiod and shaped by latitude, elevation and regional climate.

 

Cannabis flowering cycles and thus inflorescence development are regulated chiefly by day lengths, known as the photoperiod. Short days restructure the shoot apex into the condensed compound raceme recognized as the flowering canopy, while solitary flowers can arise by age-dependent cues under long days.

 

The photoperiod threshold that shifts plants into full inflorescence formation is genotype specific; experimental work places cultivar critical photoperiod near 13 to 14 hours, with some cultivars still mounting strong flowering responses under photoperiods longer than 12 hours.

Geography structures these cycles. At low latitudes where annual daylength varies little, populations frequently show protracted or staggered flowering and weaker cohort synchrony. In higher latitudes and in many montane climates, stronger seasonal photoperiod and temperature signals favor tighter, late-season flowering windows and synchronized maturation. Temperature integrates with photoperiod to advance or delay timing, reinforcing these geographic patterns.

Ambiguities: Claims of widespread day-neutrality in landraces are contested. Current evidence indicates that age can induce solitary flowers irrespective of daylength, yet development of the full inflorescence remains a short-day response and reported day-neutral behavior is best explained by genotype-specific thresholds and environments rather than true independence from photoperiod.

References:

  • Spitzer-Rimon, B., Duchin, S., Bernstein, N., & Kamenetsky, R. (2019). Architecture and Florogenesis in Female Cannabis sativa Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science.

  • Alter, H., et al. (2024). Inflorescence development in female cannabis plants is mediated by photoperiod and gibberellin. Horticulture Research.

  • Zhang, M., et al. (2021). Photoperiodic Flowering Response of Essential Oil, Grain, and Fiber Hemp Cultivars. Frontiers in Plant Science.

  • Ahrens, A., et al. (2023). Is Twelve Hours Really the Optimum Photoperiod for Promoting Flowering in Indoor-Grown Cultivars of Cannabis sativa? Plants.

  • Steel, L., et al. (2023). Comparative genomics of flowering behavior in Cannabis sativa. Frontiers in Plant Science.

  • Salentijn, E. M. J., et al. (2019). The Complex Interactions Between Flowering Behavior and Fiber Quality in Hemp. Frontiers in Plant Science.

Related terms: [Photoperiod] | [Latitude] | [Critical Photoperiod] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Altitude/Elevation

Definition: Vertical distance of a site above mean sea level, used as a practical proxy for atmospheric conditions that co-vary with height.

Altitude/Elevation structures growing environments by lowering air temperature and pressure and by increasing clear-sky ultraviolet irradiance. In the standard atmosphere, temperature declines ~6.5 °C per 1,000 m and pressure decreases predictably with elevation; under cloud-free conditions, UV irradiance typically rises on the order of 8–10% per 1,000 m. These gradients compress growing seasons, elevate frost risk and alter evapotranspiration and stress responses, making altitude a powerful axis for ecological comparison and inference.

For cannabis, elevation-linked environments influence morphology, phenology and the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. For example; Alpine landraces of the Hindu Kush and Himalayan regions, cultivated on a gradient from 2,000–3,000 m, differ in their appearance according to the elevation at which they are grown. At the higher elevations, smaller plants with dense inflorescences and robust stems predominate while more vigorous, tall plants with loose racemes have adapted to compete at lower elevations, though both tend to flower rapidly to complete their life cycle within the shorter seasons typical of the region.

 

Experimental UV-B supplementation has increased Δ9-THC in some chemotypes, indicating that high-elevation UV regimes can modulate cannabinoid production. Folk wisdom in the cannabis community suggests that better quality Cannabis is produced at higher altitudes, whether this is the case or not may yet be revealed via experimentation. ​​

References:

  • COESA (1976). U.S. Standard Atmosphere, 1976. U.S. Government Printing Office. ngdc.noaa.gov

  • Blumthaler, M., Ambach, W., & Ellinger, R. (1997). Increase in solar UV radiation with altitude. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 39, 130–134. ScienceDirect

  • Körner, C. (2007). The use of “altitude” in ecological research. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 569–574. 

  • Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press. 

  • Lydon, J., Teramura, A. H., & Coffman, C. B. (1987). UV-B radiation effects on photosynthesis, growth and cannabinoid production of two Cannabis sativa chemotypes. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 46, 201–206. 

Related terms: [UV] | [Photoperiod] | [Agroecological Zone] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Altitudinal CLine

Definition: A systematic, directional change in genetic or phenotypic traits within a species along an elevation gradient, typically produced by spatially varying selection across altitude-associated environments. 

Altitude structures temperature, season length, and ultraviolet (UV) irradiance, creating strong and repeatable selection pressures across short geographic distances. In plants this often yields clinal shifts in phenology, stature, leaf traits and secondary metabolism that track elevation bands, while gene flow tends to smooth these gradients. UV irradiance increases with height above sea level, strengthening selection for protective pigmentation and trichome density in high-elevation populations. In Cannabis, experimental UV-B exposure has been shown to alter growth and increase cannabinoid production in drug-type chemotypes, a mechanism consistent with selection along high-UV mountain slopes.

Detecting an altitudinal cline requires separating plastic responses from heritable differences. Robust inference relies on common-garden or reciprocal-transplant experiments and, where possible, genomic tests for allele-frequency gradients that parallel trait gradients. Clines can be steep or shallow depending on the balance of selection and gene flow, local topography and the scale of human movement of seed. 

References:

  • Huxley, J. (1938). Clines: an auxiliary taxonomic principle. Nature, 142, 219–220. 

  • Endler, J. A. (1977). Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines. Princeton University Press. 

  • Körner, C. (2021). Alpine Plant Life: Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems. Springer. 

  • Blumthaler, M., Ambach, W., & Ellinger, R. (1997). Increase in solar UV radiation with altitude. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 39, 130–134. 

  • Lydon, J., Teramura, A. H., & Coffman, C. B. (1987). UV-B radiation effects on photosynthesis, growth and cannabinoid production of two Cannabis sativa chemotypes. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 46(2), 201–206. 

  • Savolainen, O., Lascoux, M., & Merilä, J. (2013). Ecological genomics of local adaptation. Nature Reviews Genetics, 14, 807–820. 

Related terms: [Latitude] | [Landrace] | [Genepool] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Topography

Definition: The three-dimensional configuration of the land surface, commonly described by elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, and related terrain metrics.

Topography structures local climate and resources in mountainous and monsoonal landscapes. Slope and aspect modulate incident solar radiation and energy–water exchanges, creating systematic temperature and moisture contrasts between equator-facing and pole-facing slopes that shape plant growth and community composition.

 

Topographic controls on air drainage produce cold-air pooling in basins and valley bottoms, generating temperature inversions, frost pockets, and distinct growing risks. Complex terrain also creates microrefugia that buffer macroclimatic change, allowing persistence of locally adapted lineages and phenotypes important to landrace cultivation

 

Hydrologically, hillslope form and curvature influence soil moisture storage, runoff pathways, erosion and nutrient delivery, with direct consequences for field siting, disease pressure and resilience to extreme rainfall.

Ambiguities: usage varies by discipline and scale. Some authors treat “terrain,” “relief,” and “topography” as overlapping; derived metrics depend on the resolution and algorithms used on digital elevation models, so interpretations are scale-sensitive.

References:

  • Pike, R.J., Evans, I.S., & Hengl, T. (2008). Geomorphometry: A Brief Guide. In T. Hengl & H.I. Reuter (Eds.), Geomorphometry: Concepts, Software, Applications. Elsevier.

  • Yin, G., et al. (2023). Aspect matters: Unraveling microclimate impacts on mountain greenness and greening. Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2023GL105879.

  • Pastore, M.A., et al. (2022). Cold-air pools as microrefugia for ecosystem functions in a changing climate. Ecology.

  • Dobrowski, S.Z. (2011). A climatic basis for microrefugia: The influence of terrain on climate. Global Change Biology, 17, 1022–1035.

  • Hartmann, A., & Blume, T. (2024). The evolution of hillslope hydrology: Links between form, function and the underlying control of geology. Water Resources Research, 60, e2023WR035937.

  • Wilson, J.P., & Gallant, J.C. (2000). Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications. Wiley.

Related terms: [Altitude] | [Aspect] | [Microclimate] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Aspect

Definition: Compass direction a slope faces relative to north, which alters received solar radiation and shapes local microclimate across seasons.

Aspect regulates potential insolation and the surface energy balance. In the Northern Hemisphere, south-facing slopes are typically warmer and drier, while north-facing slopes are cooler and moister due to reduced direct sun; the pattern reverses in the Southern Hemisphere. East-facing slopes receive morning sun and often remain cooler than west-facing slopes that heat in the afternoon.

For landrace cannabis, aspect mediates heat load, soil temperature, evapotranspiration and soil moisture, which in turn influence growth rates, disease pressure and the likelihood of ripening before frost in high-elevation or temperate settings. Equator-facing aspects can advance thermal sums and ripening in cool climates, whereas pole-facing or east-facing aspects can mitigate heat and water stress in hot, arid sites.

Aspect is reported as azimuth in degrees or grouped into cardinal classes. Because actual heat load also depends on slope angle, latitude, and horizon shading, ecologists transform aspect into composite metrics such as the heat-load index or model potential direct radiation to compare sites consistently.

References:

  • Oke, T. R. (1987). Boundary Layer Climates (2nd ed.). Routledge.

  • Barry, R. G. (2008). Mountain Weather and Climate (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

  • McCune, B., & Keon, D. (2002). Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. Journal of Vegetation Science, 13, 603–606.

  • Dobrowski, S. Z. (2011). A climatic basis for microrefugia: The influence of terrain on climate. Global Change Biology, 17, 1022–1035.

  • Daly, C., Conklin, D. R., & Unsworth, M. H. (2007). High-resolution spatial modeling of daily weather elements. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 46, 1565–1581.

Related terms: [Microclimate] | [Altitude] | [Topography] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Rainshadow

Definition: Leeward region of reduced precipitation caused by orographic uplift of moist air on a windward slope, moisture loss through precipitation and subsequent descent of drier, warmer air on the lee.

Moist air forced up a mountain barrier cools, condenses and precipitates on the windward side. Air that crests the divide descends with adiabatic warming, lowering relative humidity and inhibiting cloud formation on the lee, which produces a spatial pattern of suppressed rainfall known as a rainshadow.

 

The magnitude and footprint of the rainshadow depend on barrier height and width, prevailing wind direction and stability, upstream moisture supply and large-scale circulation. In South Asia, pronounced rainshadow conditions occur leeward of the Himalayas and in the interior of the Western Ghats during the monsoon season.

For cultivation and landrace conservation, rainshadow climates often combine low annual precipitation with high solar irradiance, large diurnal temperature ranges, and episodic foehn-type downslope winds. These factors shape agroecological zones, influencing soil moisture regimes, irrigation needs, flowering schedules and selection for drought-avoidance traits. 

References:

  • Barry, R. G. (2008). Mountain Weather and Climate (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

  • Roe, G. H. (2005). Orographic precipitation. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 33, 645–671.

  • Whiteman, C. D. (2000). Mountain Meteorology: Fundamentals and Applications. Oxford University Press.

  • Smith, R. B. (1979). The influence of mountains on the atmosphere. Advances in Geophysics, 21, 87–230.

  • Boos, W. R., & Kuang, Z. (2010). Dominant control of the South Asian monsoon by orographic insulation versus mechanical blocking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(28), 12511–12516.

Related terms: [Climate Type] | [Microclimate] | [Monsoon] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Monsoon

Definition: Seasonal reversal in prevailing winds that produces a pronounced annual cycle of rainfall across the tropics and subtropics, driven by land–sea thermal contrast and the seasonal migration of the tropical circulation.

Monsoon systems structure wet and dry seasons across South, Southeast, and East Asia, West Africa and the Americas. Most annual precipitation arrives during the wet phase, which sets rainfed farming calendars, sowing and harvest windows, drives humidity and cloud cover, and constrains post-harvest drying and storage. For smallholders and specialty crops like Cannabis Sativa L., this concentrates both water availability and disease pressure within a few months each year.

In practice, traditional landrace cultivation cycles aim to time the vegetative growth with the monsoon, smaller plants being more resistant to high winds and appreciating the humidity. The ripening, harvest and post -harvest processing thus take place during the subsequent dry period.

References:

  • Webster, P. J., Magaña, V. O., Palmer, T. N., Shukla, J., Tomas, R. A., Yanai, M., & Yasunari, T. (1998). Monsoons: Processes, predictability, and the prospects for prediction. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 103(C7), 14451–14510. AGU Publications

  • IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Annex V: Monsoons. Cambridge University Press. IPCC

  • Wang, B., & Ding, Q. (2008). Global monsoon: Dominant mode of annual variation in the tropics. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 44(3–4), 165–183. 

  • Turner, A. G., & Annamalai, H. (2012). Climate change and the South Asian summer monsoon. Nature Climate Change, 2, 587–595. 

  • Gadgil, S. (2003). The Indian monsoon and its variability. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 31, 429–467. 

Related terms: [Climate Type] | [Rainfall] | [Rainshadow] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Rainfall

Definition: The total liquid water from rain that reaches the ground over a stated period, expressed as an equivalent depth in millimetres (mm) or, for liquid, kilograms per square metre (kg m⁻²). 

Rainfall is a core hydrometeorological driver that structures agroecological calendars, soil–water balance and disease pressure. Totals, timing, and intensity (mm h⁻¹) determine sowing and harvest windows, irrigation demand, nutrient leaching risk and the likelihood of foliar pathogens. In traditional landrace cannabis cultivation systems, rainfall regime interacts with canopy density and harvest timing, influencing susceptibility to mold and the need for farmer selection toward traits such as looser inflorescences and fast drying after storms.

Climatologists describe the seasonal distribution of rainfall with indices such as the Walsh–Lawler Seasonality Index (SI), which quantifies how concentrated annual rain is into particular months and helps distinguish equatorial, monsoonal, Mediterranean and other climates.

References:

  • World Meteorological Organization (2008). Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (WMO-No. 8).

  • American Meteorological Society. Glossary of Meteorology (peer-reviewed reference; non-academic).

  • Walsh, R.P.D., & Lawler, D.M. (1981). Rainfall seasonality: Description, spatial patterns and change through time. Weather, 36, 201–208.

  • Dingman, S.L. (2015). Physical Hydrology (3rd ed.). Waveland Press.

  • Chandra, S., Lata, H., & ElSohly, M.A. (Eds.). (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

Related terms: [Rainshadow] | [Monsoon] | [Climate Type] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Temperature

Definition: The thermal state of air, soil, or plant tissues, expressed in degrees, that governs rates of physiological and developmental processes in plants.

 

In field settings, air temperature measured at 2m often differs from canopy and leaf temperatures because radiation, wind, humidity and transpiration shift the leaf energy balance. With adequate water, leaves typically track air temperature within a small margin, but water stress reduces evaporative cooling and leaf temperatures rise above air temperature.

 

Plant development follows species-specific cardinal temperatures: a base temperature (Tb) below which development ceases, an optimum (Topt) where rates peak and a maximum (Tmax) beyond which injury occurs. These thresholds vary by species and ecotype and can differ among life stages.

Phenology is commonly modeled as thermal time using growing degree days (GDD), which accumulate daily heat units relative to Tb, typically computed as GDD = [(Tmax + Tmin)/2] − Tb. This links temperature regimes to germination, vegetative growth and flowering time across environments.

For cannabis, controlled cultivation studies report optimal growth around 25 to 30 °C, with performance declining outside this range depending on genetics and cultivation conditions. Temperature thus interacts with light, CO₂ and water status to shape growth, chemotype expression and yield.

References:

  • Monteith, J.L., & Unsworth, M.H. (2013). Principles of Environmental Physics: Plants, Animals, and the Atmosphere. 4th ed. Academic Press. 

  • Nelson, J.A., et al. (2015). Analysis of Environmental Effects on Leaf Temperature under Sunlight, High Pressure Sodium and Light Emitting Diodes. PLOS ONE. 

  • Sohrabi, S., et al. (2024). Factors Influencing the Variation of Plants’ Cardinal Temperature: A Case Study in Iran. Plants. PMCMDPI

  • McMaster, G.S., & Wilhelm, W.W. (1997). Growing degree-days: One equation, two interpretations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 

  • Chandra, S., Lata, H., & ElSohly, M.A. (2020). Propagation of Cannabis for Clinical Research: An Approach Towards a Modern Herbal Medicinal Products Development. Frontiers in Plant Science.

Related terms: [Altitude] | [Microclimate] | [Climate Type] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Diurnal Temperature range

Definition: The difference between a location’s daily maximum and minimum air temperature.

Diurnal temperature range (DTR) reflects the balance between daytime solar heating and nighttime radiative cooling. It widens under clear, dry, and high-elevation conditions that favor strong surface heating by day and rapid cooling at night, and narrows with cloud cover, high humidity, wet soils and aerosols that limit daytime insolation and trap longwave radiation after sunset. In monsoon climates, DTR typically contracts during cloudy, humid months and expands in the dry season.

Globally, many areas saw a twentieth-century decline in DTR because minimum temperatures rose faster than maximum temperatures. Subsequent updates show that this pattern is not spatially or seasonally uniform, with regional exceptions linked to cloudiness, soil moisture and air pollution trends. For mountain regions, large DTR is common where clear skies and thin, dry air enhance nocturnal radiation loss.

The day–night temperature gap modulates plant carbon balance by setting photosynthesis during the day against respiration at night. Narrowing DTR driven by warmer nights can reduce yields in sensitive crops like Cannabis, while colder nights precipitate the accumulation of pigments in the leaf matter and inflorescences, illustrating why nighttime minima matter for growth, morphology and phenology.

 

For cannabis, temperature regimes influence growth, stress responses, and secondary metabolite biosynthesis; breeders and growers should interpret DTR in concert with mean temperature, humidity and seasonality in the source environment.

References:

  • Dai, A., Trenberth, K. E., & Karl, T. R. (1999). Effects of clouds, soil moisture, precipitation, and water vapor on diurnal temperature range. Journal of Climate.

  • Easterling, D. R., et al. (1997). Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe. Science.

  • Vose, R. S., et al. (2005). Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe: An update through 2004. Geophysical Research Letters.

  • Barry, R. G. (2008). Mountain Weather and Climate (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

  • Peng, S., et al. (2004). Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

  • Chandra, S., et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

Related terms: [Temperature] | [Altitude] | [Monsoon] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

UV Radiation

Definition: Electromagnetic solar radiation in the 100–400 nm range that reaches Earth mainly as UVA (315–400 nm) and UVB (280–315 nm) and shapes plant development, stress responses and signaling through dose- and spectrum-dependent effects.

 

At the surface, UV varies predictably with geography. Altitude amplifies daily UV totals by roughly 8% per 1000 m under clear skies; latitude, season, clouds, aerosols, surface albedo and slope aspect further modulate exposure. 

In plants, UVB is sensed by the photoreceptor UVR8, which triggers photomorphogenic responses and the accumulation of protective metabolites. In cannabis, classic chamber studies reported THC increases under supplemental UVB in a high-THC chemotype, while recent controlled trials using UVA and UVB found no commercially relevant gains in inflorescence yield or total cannabinoid content, highlighting genotype, spectrum, and dose as key determinants. 

References:

  • IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. (2012). Solar and Ultraviolet Radiation. IARC Monographs, 100D.

  • Blumthaler, M., Ambach, W., & Ellinger, R. (1997). Increase in solar UV radiation with altitude. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 39(2), 130–134.

  • Jenkins, G. I. (2014). The UV-B photoreceptor UVR8: From structure to physiology. The Plant Cell, 26(1), 21–37.

  • Lydon, J., Teramura, A. H., & Coffman, C. B. (1987). UV-B radiation effects on photosynthesis, growth and cannabinoid production of two Cannabis sativa chemotypes. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 46(2), 201–206.

  • Llewellyn, D., Golem, S., Foley, E., Dinka, S., Jones, A. M. P., & Zheng, Y. (2022). Indoor grown cannabis yield increased proportionally with light intensity, but ultraviolet radiation did not affect yield or cannabinoid content. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 974018.

Related terms: [Latitude] | [Altitude] | [Aspect] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Relative Humidity

Definition: The ratio of actual water vapour pressure to the saturation vapour pressure at the same temperature, expressed as a percentage. 

Relative humidity (RH) is temperature dependent. Warming air without adding moisture lowers RH, while cooling raises it. Dew point provides a temperature-based way to relate RH to moisture content and simple conversions link RH, dew point and saturation vapour pressure.

 

In field and greenhouse microclimates, RH is best interpreted alongside vapor pressure deficit (VPD), which more directly governs leaf-to-air water flux. As VPD rises, plants increase transpiration and typically reduce stomatal conductance, with species-specific thresholds. For cannabis production, sustained high RH during late flowering increases pathogen pressure under moderate temperatures.

References:

  • World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Guide to Instruments and Methods of Observation (WMO-No. 8). Geneva, 2021–2023. 

  • Lawrence, M.G. (2005). The Relationship between Relative Humidity and the Dewpoint Temperature in Moist Air: A Simple Conversion and Applications. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 86, 225–233. American Meteorological Society JournalsAstrophysics Data System

  • Monteith, J.L., & Unsworth, M.H. (2013). Principles of Environmental Physics: Plants, Animals, and the Atmosphere. 4th ed., Academic Press. 

  • Ocheltree, T.W., Nippert, J.B., & Prasad, P.V.V. (2014). Stomatal responses to changes in vapor pressure deficit reflect tissue-specific differences in hydraulic conductance. Plant, Cell & Environment, 37, 132–139. 

  • Mahmoud, M., BenRejeb, I., Punja, Z.K., Buirs, L., & Jabaji, S. (2023). Understanding bud rot development, caused by Botrytis cinerea, on cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) plants grown under greenhouse conditions. Botany, 101, 200–231. 

Related terms: [Rainfall] | [Monsoon] | [Microclimate] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Soil & Edaphic Factors

Definition: Soil and edaphic factors are the soil-derived physical, chemical, and biological properties and processes that regulate plant distribution, performance and adaptation at a site. 

Edaphic variables include texture and structure, depth and coarse fragments, organic matter, pH and carbonate or sodicity status, cation exchange capacity and base saturation, macro- and micronutrient supply, salinity and specific ion toxicities, redox and drainage, bulk density, and root-zone temperature. Together they govern water and oxygen availability to roots, solubility and speciation of nutrients, and the activity of soil biota that mediate nutrient cycling.

Soil pH controls the chemical form, solubility and adsorption of many nutrients and therefore their plant availability, but widely circulated “pH vs nutrient availability” charts are heuristic rather than universal. Availability depends on mineralogy, organic matter, carbonate or salt content, and local climate and drainage. Cation exchange capacity integrates the density of negative charge on clays and organic matter and thus a soil’s capacity to retain and exchange nutrient cations; its expression and contribution shift with pH, clay type and organic matter across soil profiles.

For cannabis, edaphic conditions measurably shape growth, inflorescence yield and secondary metabolism. Controlled studies show strong responses to root-zone fertility in soilless substrates during flowering, with fertilizer rate affecting both biomass and cannabinoid output. Tolerance to edaphic stress also varies among cultivars; for example, hemp exhibits cultivar-specific sensitivity to salt type and concentration during early growth.

References:

  • USDA National Agricultural Library. NAL Agricultural Thesaurus: “Edaphic factors.” 2015 revision.

  • Marschner, P. (2012). Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 3rd ed. Academic Press.

  • Kish, S. (2024). “Soil pH and Nutrients: Everything Is Local.” Crops & Soils (American Society of Agronomy). [Professional magazine]

  • Solly, E. F., Weber, V., Zimmermann, S., Walthert, L., Hagedorn, F., & Schmidt, M. W. I. (2020). “A Critical Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Effective Cation Exchange Capacity and Soil Organic Carbon Content in Swiss Forest Soils.” Frontiers in Forests and Global Change.

  • Caplan, D., Dixon, M., & Zheng, Y. (2017). “Optimal Rate of Organic Fertilizer During the Flowering Stage for Cannabis Grown in Two Coir-based Substrates.” HortScience 52(12): 1796–1803.

  • Hu, H., et al. (2019). “Physiological responses of hemp to salinity vary with salt type and concentration.” Industrial Crops & Products.

Related terms: [Topography] | [Rainfall] | [Monsoon] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002363.jpg

Microclimates

Definition: The set of atmospheric conditions in a small, specific area near the ground or within a plant canopy that differ from surrounding conditions due to local surface properties and topography.

 

Microclimates operate at fine spatial scales, from centimeters to tens of meters, and over short time frames, modulated by topography, edaphic factors and local vegetation. Vegetation structure and ground cover alter wind speed, humidity, and temperature within and just above the canopy, creating gradients that directly affect leaf energy balance, transpiration, pathogen pressure, and flowering phenology.

 

Site features such as aspect, slope position, stones and walls, cold-air drainage paths and proximity to water bodies can warm or cool air layers, change nighttime minima and shift diurnal temperature range and vapor pressure deficit. In high-elevation or highly exposed sites, greater shortwave and UV irradiance and stronger winds often select for compact architecture, thicker cuticles and increased resin production; UV-B can also influence cannabinoid profiles in Cannabis.

References:

  • Oke, T. R. (1987). Boundary Layer Climates (2nd ed.). Routledge.

  • Geiger, R., Aron, R. H., & Todhunter, P. (2009). The Climate Near the Ground (7th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Jones, H. G. (2013). Plants and Microclimate (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

  • Monteith, J. L., & Unsworth, M. H. (2013). Principles of Environmental Physics: Plants, Animals, and the Atmosphere (4th ed.). Academic Press.

  • Lydon, J., Teramura, A. H., & Coffman, C. B. (1987). UV-B radiation effects on photosynthesis, growth and cannabinoid production of two Cannabis sativa chemotypes. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 46, 201–206.

Related terms: [Aspect] | [Relative Humidity] | [Diurnal Temperature] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1050474.jpg

Terroir

Definition: The complete set of environmental factors including soil, topography, climate and cultivation practices that impart distinctive characteristics to agricultural products from a specific geographic location.

In cannabis, terroir encompasses the interaction between edaphic factors, microclimates, local topography, and traditional cultivation methods that collectively influence chemotype expression, morphology and organoleptic qualities. Controlled studies demonstrate that identical genotypes grown at different altitudes show 32-63% variation in cannabinoid concentrations, with CBDA increasing 63% at 1,200m versus 130m elevation. Environmental factors account for 20-48% of chemical variation in cannabis, while genetic heritability controls 60-80% of cannabinoid traits. Outdoor cultivation produces 100-fold less degraded cannabinoids compared to indoor cultivation using identical cultivars, with greater terpene diversity and significantly higher sesquiterpene concentrations.

Terroir operates as a hybrid zone where biophysical reality and cultural meaning co-create each other. Measurable environmental factors like UV radiation, soil minerals, and humidity interact with human decisions about cultivation, harvest timing and processing methods. This dynamic shapes both plant biochemistry and the cultural narratives societies construct around their cannabis. High UV-B exposure historically increased THC by 25-32%, while mild drought stress raises β-caryophyllene levels by 15%, yet these environmental influences gain cultural significance only when communities invest them with meaning through rituals, naming practices and narratives that transform chemical differences into cultural identity.

In Malana Valley, in the Western Himalayan region of India, at 3,000m elevation, cannabis terroir manifests in both molecules and meaning. Cool alpine air preserves fragile monoterpenes like linalool and myrcene, yielding floral, bright aromatic profiles distinct from lower elevation cultivation. Local cultivators hand-rub fresh resin using labor-intensive techniques linked to religious festivals and passed through generations, producing Malana 'Cream' charas with THC concentrations of 30-40% compared to other Indian varieties, averaging 5-8%. The result embodies an olfactory and psychoactive imprint of place, investing the resin with economic value and symbolic capital that transcends mere chemical composition.

 

Morocco's Rif Mountains demonstrate industrial-scale terroir across 57,000 hectares producing 40% of globally seized hashish. Traditional dry sieving in arid climates favors sesquiterpenes like β-caryophyllene, producing hashish with peppery, woody notes distinct from Afghan or Lebanese products. Chouvy documents how centuries of kif [landrace] cultivation created distinctive terroir products characterized by specific sieving techniques, unique [terpene] profiles, and place-based typicity⁴. He argues that cannabis terroir represents both products and determinants of territory, emerging from specific geohistories where geographic remoteness, isolation, and politico-territorial control deficits enabled traditional cultivation to persist despite prohibition. The modernization since 2010 with European hybrid varieties has increased potency but threatens the genetic and cultural foundations of Moroccan terroir.

 

The mechanisms underlying cannabis terroir operate through multiple pathways. Altitude-associated UV radiation triggers protective [trichome] density and cannabinoid production as photo-protective compounds. Soil mineral composition affects nutrient uptake and secondary metabolism, with phosphorus deficiency increasing THCA and CBDA by 25% while reducing biomass. Temperature regimes prove critical, with high temperatures reducing total cannabinoid concentrations and cold acclimation decreasing both CBD and THC content by over 50% while altering CBD:THC ratios from 21.50 to 27.55. Drought stress causes 70-80% reductions in cannabinoid production during early flowering, contradicting assumptions about environmental hardening improving potency. [Diurnal temperature range] modulates terpene volatilization and retention, with wider ranges in mountain regions preserving volatile monoterpenes while narrow ranges in humid lowlands favor heavier sesquiterpenes.

Cannabis terroir evolved in clandestine geographies where growers eluded state repression through cultivation in remote valleys, hidden terraces, and marginal lands. Unlike regulated crops, cannabis terroirs developed outside legal frameworks in spaces of incomplete territorial control. Prohibition paradoxically preserved unique local practices and genetic stocks by deterring industrial investment while simultaneously criminalizing the communities who sustain these landscapes. This created terroirs defined as much by illegality as by environment, where traditional knowledge transmission occurred through informal networks rather than institutional channels.

Chouvy emphasizes that terroir is never neutral but operates within power relations and geopolitical tensions. Premium prices for "Malana Cream" or "Ketama hashish" often flow away from small cultivators toward middlemen and global markets. Cannabis tourism commodifies "authentic terroir experiences" for global consumers while local producers remain criminalized. Modern hybridization threatens terroir by diluting local landrace traits and eroding cultural narratives tied to traditional cultivars, risking not only biochemical homogenization but the erasure of place-based identities.

The measurement of cannabis terroir faces both scientific and cultural challenges. Cannabinoid and terpene profiles fluctuate even within single cultivars across grows. Cannabis lacks the institutional structures like sensory panels or legal codifications that define terroir in wine. Chouvy argues that appellations of origin offer the only existing intellectual property protection suitable for terroir cannabis products, as they protect collective ownership and tradition rather than individual innovation. The term terroir is sometimes applied in marketing contexts without rigorous geographic or analytical substantiation, particularly as legalization creates new commercial pressures to claim terroir status without meeting its definitional requirements.

References:

  • Giupponi, L., et al. (2020). Influence of altitude on phytochemical composition of hemp inflorescence: A metabolomic approach. Molecules, 25(6), 1381.

  • Zandkarimi, F., et al. (2023). Comparison of the cannabinoid and terpene profiles in commercial cannabis from natural and artificial cultivation. Molecules, 28(2), 833.

  • Chouvy, P. A. (2022). Why the concept of terroir matters for drug cannabis production. GeoJournal, 88(1), 89-106.

  • Chouvy, P. A. (2022). Moroccan hashish as an example of a cannabis terroir product. GeoJournal, 88(4), 3833-3850.

  • Shiponi, S., & Bernstein, N. (2021). Response of medical cannabis to nitrogen supply under long photoperiod. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 657323.

  • Chouvy, P. A. (2024). International property rights for Cannabis landraces and terroir products. International Journal of Drug Policy, 129, 104479.

Related terms: [Chemotype] | [Edaphic Factors] | [Microclimate] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

India Map2.jpg

Appellations

Definition: Geographic designations that link agricultural products to specific regions, establishing legal protection for traditional production methods and terroir-based quality distinctions.

Appellations formalize the connection between place and product through controlled designations of origin that protect regional names, traditional cultivation practices and quality standards. Originally developed for wine in France's Appellation d'Origine Contrôlée (AOC) system, these frameworks have expanded globally to encompass diverse agricultural products including spirits, cheeses, and specialty crops. The system recognizes that geographic factors including climate, soil, topography and local cultivation knowledge contribute to distinctive product characteristics that cannot be replicated elsewhere.

In cannabis, appellations represent an emerging framework for protecting landrace populations and traditional cultivation regions from commercial appropriation. Several jurisdictions have begun developing cannabis appellation systems, notably California's cannabis appellations program and similar initiatives in other legal markets. These systems typically establish geographic boundaries, specify permitted cultivation practices, and require products to originate from designated areas to carry protected regional names.

Cannabis appellations face unique challenges compared to established agricultural products. The crop's recent legal status has disrupted traditional cultivation knowledge and regional continuity. Many heritage growing regions remain under prohibition, preventing formal recognition of their contributions to cannabis diversity. Additionally, extensive hybridization has complicated efforts to establish authentic regional chemotypes and morphological characteristics.

The concept intersects with broader discussions of biopiracy and neocolonialism in cannabis, as commercial markets increasingly appropriate traditional strain names and cultivation knowledge without benefiting origin communities. Appellations offer one mechanism for protecting indigenous and traditional cultivators' intellectual property rights while preserving genetic diversity and cultural heritage.

 

Effective cannabis appellations require careful attention to climatic boundaries, traditional cultivation practices, genetic authenticity and community participation in governance structures. Success depends on balancing commercial viability with cultural preservation and environmental sustainability.

References:

  1. Barham, E. (2003). Translating terroir: The global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 127-138.

  2. California Department of Food and Agriculture. (2021). Cannabis appellations program: Establishing standards for geographic designations. CDFA Cannabis Control Section.

  3. Giovannucci, D., et al. (2009). Guide to geographical indications: Linking products and their origins. International Trade Centre.

Related terms: [Latitude] | [Landrace] | [Terroir] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049600.jpg

Morphology

Cannabis morphology describes the physical structures of the plant—its leaves, stems, flowers, and reproductive organs. Understanding these terms helps identify different varieties, diagnose cultivation issues, and appreciate the plant’s biological complexity.

 

This section defines key anatomical terms used in cannabis science and cultivation.

Related terms: [Node] | [Bracts] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049157.jpg

Seed Morphology

Definition: The study of the form, structure, and surface characteristics of seeds, including features relevant to classification, viability, and adaptation.

 

In Cannabis sativa, the seed is an achene: a dry, indehiscent fruit that contains a single seed loosely enclosed by the pericarp. Mature cannabis seeds are typically ovoid, measuring 2–5 mm in length and 2–4 mm in width. The seed coat (testa) is hard and often exhibits mottled or marbled patterns due to the presence of phytomelanin and varying degrees of cuticular thickening. Color ranges from pale beige to dark brown, often correlating with lignification during maturation.

The hilum, a small scar marking the point of attachment to the ovary wall, is usually located at the tapered end of the seed and may be used to distinguish orientation. Beneath the seed coat lies the embryo, which is composed of two large cotyledons and a hypocotyl-radicle axis. The endosperm in cannabis is typically absent or vestigial, with nutrient reserves stored in the cotyledons.

Seed morphology plays a key role in ethnobotanical contexts and agricultural selection. In traditional settings, larger seeds with distinct tiger-striping or glossy surfaces are sometimes favored for planting, though these preferences are anecdotal and not necessarily linked to agronomic performance. Morphological traits may vary among landrace populations due to local selection pressures, including dispersal mechanisms and germination timing. However, seed appearance is not a reliable indicator of chemotype, genetic lineage, or vigor and should not be used in isolation for classification or breeding purposes.

While some studies suggest minor morphological differences in seed shape and size across major subspecies or ecotypes of Cannabis sativa (e.g. indica vs. sativa types), such distinctions are neither consistent nor diagnostic without accompanying genetic or anatomical data².

Related terms: [Internode] | [Bracts] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049157.jpg

Node

In cannabis morphology, a node is the point on a stem where leaves, branches, or flowers (inflorescences) originate. Nodes are crucial structural features because they determine the plant’s growth pattern and are sites for potential new growth.

Each node bears:

  • A pair of leaves (opposite phyllotaxy in juvenile plants, often becoming alternate in mature plants).

  • Axillary buds capable of forming branches or inflorescences.

 

Early sex determination often becomes visible at nodes, where pre-flowers emerge in axillary positions. Male plants form small pollen sacs, while female plants produce pistillate structures with stigmas.

Growers manipulate nodes through topping, pruning, or low-stress training to control plant height, promote bushier growth, increase the number of flowering sites.

Node counting is sometimes used to assess plant age or developmental stage, predict flowering onset and evaluate response to environmental conditions or stress.

Related terms: [Internode] | [Bracts] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049064.jpg

Internode

An internode in cannabis refers to the segment of stem located between two successive nodes - the points where leaves, branches, or inflorescences attach. The length of this stem segment, known as the internodal distance, is a key morphological trait influenced by genetics, environment, and cultivation practices.

In cannabis, shorter internodes are often seen in broad-leaf, compact plants associated with higher latitudes or mountainous regions, while longer internodes are typical of taller, narrow-leaf plants adapted to tropical or subtropical climates where light penetration favors vertical growth. Environmental factors like high light intensity, cooler temperatures and lower nitrogen availability can reduce internodal spacing, resulting in bushier plants, whereas shade, high humidity, and warmth often promote internodal elongation; a response known as etiolation.

Growers monitor internodal distance closely because it affects canopy density, airflow and potential yield. Techniques such as topping and low-stress training are commonly used to control internode length, creating a more manageable plant structure with additional flowering sites.

 

Internodal distance also serves as a diagnostic indicator for identifying/classifying plants, detecting stress and predicting final plant architecture.

Related terms: [Internode] | [Bracts] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049786.jpg

Stem

The stem of a cannabis plant serves as its central structural axis, supporting leaves, branches, and reproductive organs while transporting water, nutrients, and photosynthates between roots and aerial tissues. Composed of vascular tissues (xylem and phloem) the stem acts both as a conduit and as mechanical support, giving the plant rigidity and resilience.

Stem morphology varies significantly across cannabis genotypes. Many broad-leaf drug-type plants from higher latitudes develop stout, thick stems with strong fiber content, traits beneficial in windy or mountainous regions. Conversely, narrow-leaf tropical cultivars often produce taller, thinner stems adapted for rapid vertical growth and efficient light competition under canopy conditions. Environmental factors such as wind exposure, nutrient levels and cultivation practices like pruning can further influence stem diameter and strength.

Stem color in cannabis ranges from green to purple or even reddish hues, depending on cultivar genetics, light intensity, temperature fluctuations, and anthocyanin accumulation. A purple or reddish stem is not necessarily a sign of nutrient deficiency or stress but can be a normal genetic trait in certain cultivar. 

Beyond structural and physiological roles, the cannabis stem has historical significance in fiber production, particularly in hemp varieties. Hemp stems are harvested for bast fibers located in the outer stem tissues, valued for textile manufacturing and other industrial uses. In breeding, stem characteristics such as thickness, rigidity and fiber content are important selection criteria for both drug-type and fiber-type cannabis.

Related terms: [Node] | [Internode] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049786.jpg

Petiole

Definition: The petiole is the stalk that connects the leaf blade (lamina) to the stem, facilitating transport between them and enabling leaf orientation.

 

In Cannabis sativa, petioles are structurally distinct, typically long, slender, and terete. Cross-sectional shape and length may vary by ecotype, environmental conditions and developmental stage.

 

Functionally, petioles contain vascular tissues (xylem and phloem) that conduct water, minerals, and photosynthates between the stem and leaf lamina. The petiole also plays a key role in leaf positioning, optimizing light interception through changes in angle and torsion.

In palmately compound cannabis leaves, each leaflet lacks its own petiole; instead, the petiole terminates at the base of the central (median) leaflet, with lateral leaflets radiating directly from that point. The presence, length, and rigidity of the petiole can influence leaf flutter, droop, and general posture, which may affect transpiration, temperature regulation, and visual identification of phenotypes in fieldwork.

Petiole color and pigmentation (e.g. red or purple hues) may result from anthocyanin accumulation and can vary in response to temperature, nutrient availability, or stress, but such traits are not reliable standalone indicators of chemotype or genetic lineage.

Cannabis petioles are also a site for pest interaction, notably with stem-boring insects and mites, and may respond to damage through the production of secondary metabolites.

No major taxonomic ambiguities are associated with the term, though in informal contexts, petioles are sometimes mistakenly referred to as stems.

Related terms: [Node] | [Internode] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049786.jpg

Leaflets

Definition: The individual blades of a compound leaf radiating from a single petiole, characteristic of Cannabis morphology.

Cannabis plants exhibit a 'palmately compound leaf structure', in which multiple leaflets emerge from a central point at the apex of the petiole.

 

Leaflet number, shape, and dimensions vary significantly among different cannabis populations and developmental stages. While mature leaves typically feature 5 to 11 leaflets, juvenile and early vegetative leaves often have fewer. Leaflet margins are serrated, and the apex is generally acuminate, though leaflet width, length, and aspect ratio are highly variable traits used in morphological identification and classification.

 

In landrace cannabis, leaflet morphology is often regionally distinctive and has been used to infer relationships between ecotypes. Narrow leaflets are commonly associated with populations adapted to arid or montane environments, while broader leaflets predominate in humid lowland populations. These traits, however, are not definitive markers of taxonomic rank or chemical composition and may shift across ontogeny or under environmental stress.

Phenotypic plasticity in leaflet morphology can reflect both genotypic variation and responses to light, photoperiod, or nutrient availability.

 

Interpreting leaflet traits in breeding or field surveys requires accounting for the plant’s age, growing conditions, and position on the stem. While leaflet characteristics have historically informed classifications such as “sativa” and “indica,” these categories lack genetic rigor and are no longer considered taxonomically valid. 

Related terms: [Node] | [Internode] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01002262.jpg

Fan Leaf

Fan leaves are the large, primary leaves of the cannabis plant, typically consisting of five to nine serrated leaflets radiating from a central petiole. They play a crucial role in photosynthesis, capturing light energy to fuel growth and metabolic processes.

Morphologically, fan leaves vary in size, shape and color depending on the genetic background of the plant. Broad-leaf drug-type cultivars (often originating from temperate or highland regions) tend to have wider, shorter leaflets, giving the plant a dense, bushy appearance. Narrow-leaf drug-types, associated with tropical regions, display longer, slender leaflets and a more open, airy canopy structure. These differences are among the most recognizable traits used to distinguish between cannabis varieties.

Fan leaves also serve as nutrient reservoirs. During flowering, the plant may reabsorb mobile nutrients like nitrogen from older fan leaves, leading to natural yellowing and senescence. While some cultivators remove fan leaves to improve airflow and light penetration, excessive defoliation can reduce photosynthetic capacity and stress the plant.

Beyond their functional roles, fan leaves hold cultural and symbolic significance. The iconic seven-lobed leaf has become a universal symbol of cannabis, appearing in art, advocacy and branding worldwide.

Related terms: [Stem] | [Internode] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Chinese Hemp

Sugar Leaf

Sugar leaves are the smaller leaves that emerge from within or close to cannabis inflorescences (flower clusters). Unlike the larger fan leaves, sugar leaves are shorter, narrower, and partially embedded in the bud structure. Their defining feature is a visible coating of glandular trichomes, which gives them a frosted, crystalline appearance - hence the term “sugar”.

These trichomes produce cannabinoids (like THC and CBD) and aromatic terpenes, making sugar leaves chemically potent, albeit usually less so than the dense floral bracts. While sugar leaves contribute to the aroma and resin content of harvested buds, they also contain higher concentrations of chlorophyll, which can impart harsher flavors if left in finished cannabis products.

In commercial cultivation and processing, sugar leaves are often trimmed away during manicuring to enhance the visual appeal and smoothness of cured flower. However, they remain valuable for extraction purposes, as their trichomes can be collected for making hashish, kief, rosin, or other concentrates.

Related terms: [Stem] | [Internode] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Budding .

Inflorescence

In cannabis, the inflorescence (flowers or buds) is the entire flowering cluster that develops along a stem. Botanically, it includes all the plant’s reproductive structures: floral bracts, pistils, stamens (in male plants), trichomes, and small leaves known as sugar leaves.


In female plants, inflorescences consist of dense clusters of bracts that enclose pistils and, if pollinated, seeds. These structures are coated in glandular trichomes that produce cannabinoids and terpenes - the compounds responsible for potency, aroma, and resin yield.

The shape and density of female inflorescences vary greatly depending on genetics and growing conditions. For example, tropical landraces like Thai often produce open, airy buds suited to humid climates, whereas modern hybrids typically form dense, compact flowers favored in commercial markets.

In the cultivation of seedless cannabis, male plants are removed to prevent pollination. This ensures that female inflorescences remain seedless and focused on resin production, maximizing cannabinoid content and flower weight.


In male plants, inflorescences are looser and form panicles: branching clusters bearing small, round pollen sacs. When mature, these sacs open to release pollen for fertilizing female plants. In commercial cannabis cultivation focused on flower production, male plants are typically culled early to avoid accidental pollination.

Related terms: [Stem] | [Internode] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Budding .

Raceme

In cannabis, the inflorescence (flowers or buds) is the entire flowering cluster that develops along a stem. Botanically, it includes all the plant’s reproductive structures: floral bracts, pistils, stamens (in male plants), trichomes, and small leaves known as sugar leaves.


In female plants, inflorescences consist of dense clusters of bracts that enclose pistils and, if pollinated, seeds. These structures are coated in glandular trichomes that produce cannabinoids and terpenes - the compounds responsible for potency, aroma, and resin yield.

The shape and density of female inflorescences vary greatly depending on genetics and growing conditions. For example, tropical landraces like Thai often produce open, airy buds suited to humid climates, whereas modern hybrids typically form dense, compact flowers favored in commercial markets.

In the cultivation of seedless cannabis, male plants are removed to prevent pollination. This ensures that female inflorescences remain seedless and focused on resin production, maximizing cannabinoid content and flower weight.


In male plants, inflorescences are looser and form panicles: branching clusters bearing small, round pollen sacs. When mature, these sacs open to release pollen for fertilizing female plants. In commercial cannabis cultivation focused on flower production, male plants are typically culled early to avoid accidental pollination.

Related terms: [Stem] | [Internode] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Avery Meeker

Bracts

In cannabis, a bract is a small, leaf-like structure that surrounds and protects the plant’s reproductive organs. In female plants, each bract encloses the pistil and, if pollinated, develops a single seed inside.

Bracts are especially significant because they are densely covered in glandular trichomes - tiny, resin-producing structures that synthesize cannabinoids (like THC and CBD) and terpenes. This makes bracts one of the most chemically potent parts of the cannabis inflorescence and a primary contributor to the plant’s aroma, flavor, and psychoactive effects.

Related terms: [Stem] | [Internode] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by spencer gray

Bracteoles

A bracteole in cannabis is a smaller, secondary leaf-like structure that sits just below the bract on the floral stalk. While bracts directly surround and protect the reproductive organs (like pistils in female flowers), bracteoles are subtending structures located slightly lower along the stem or flower base.

Related terms: [Bracts] | [Internode] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

hckmrqkk7px41-2833687717.jpg

Calyx

In botanical terms, the calyx is the outermost whorl of a flower, composed of small leaf-like structures called sepals that protect the developing reproductive organs.

In cannabis, “calyx” is frequently misapplied. Growers and enthusiasts often use “calyx” to describe the bract- the small, tear-shaped structure that houses the pistil and if pollinated, a seed. Technically, these are bracts, not calyces.

Related terms: [Bracts] | [Bracteoles] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by 2H Media

Pistil

The pistil is the female reproductive part of the cannabis flower, comprising the stigma, style, and ovary. Pistils are visible as hair-like structures protruding from bracts and play a key role in pollination

Related terms: [Bracts] | [Bracteoles] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Weedzard Cannabis Light

Stigma

The stigma is the hair-like tip of the pistil that captures pollen grains. In cannabis, stigmas change color as flowers mature, turning shades of orange and brown.

Related terms: [Bracts] | [Inflorescence] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Ryan Lange

Trichomes

Trichomes are specialized epidermal structures found across the surfaces of cannabis plants. They serve multiple functions, including physical protection against herbivores, insects, and pathogens, as well as shielding tissues from excessive ultraviolet (UV) radiation and desiccation stress. In cannabis, trichomes are also critical biochemical sites, producing and storing secondary metabolites that define the plant’s aromatic, therapeutic, and psychoactive properties.

Cannabis trichomes occur in several distinct forms:

  • Capitate-stalked trichomes are the most prominent and economically significant type. They consist of a multicellular stalk topped with a large glandular head composed of secretory disc cells surrounding a storage cavity. These structures synthesize and accumulate high concentrations of cannabinoids (like Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol), terpenes, flavonoids, and other secondary metabolites. They are predominantly found on the bracts and sugar leaves of female inflorescences and are the primary source of cannabis resin.
     

  • Capitate-sessile trichomes have a glandular head but lack a multicellular stalk. They are smaller than stalked types and produce lower levels of cannabinoids and terpenes. These trichomes are more widely distributed across leaf surfaces and stems.
     

  • Bulbous trichomes are the smallest type, typically consisting of a single or few cells forming a tiny glandular protrusion. They produce minimal quantities of cannabinoids and terpenes and are often found scattered over all aerial parts of the plant.
     

The density, distribution, and type of trichomes vary among cannabis cultivars and are influenced by genetic factors, environmental conditions (e.g., light intensity, temperature, nutrient availability) and cultivation practices.

During floral development and maturation, trichome gland heads undergo observable color changes from translucent (clear), to cloudy white (milky), to amber or brown. These shifts correspond to changes in cannabinoid content and the degradation of specific compounds such as THC into cannabinol (CBN). Many cultivators use trichome color as an indicator of harvest timing to optimize chemical profiles for desired effects and product quality.
 

Beyond their role in plant defense and secondary metabolite synthesis, trichomes are the anatomical basis for various cannabis products, including:

  • Charas and hashish (resin manually collected from trichomes)

  • Dry sift kief (mechanically separated trichomes)

  • Concentrates (e.g., rosin, BHO extracts)
     

The study of cannabis trichomes, including their cellular development and biochemical pathways, is a significant focus in cannabis agronomy, pharmacology, and breeding.

Related terms: [Bracts] | [Inflorescence] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1037784.jpg

Cola

In cannabis morphology, a cola is a cluster of tightly grouped female flowers (inflorescences) forming a single, dense flowering structure. The term can refer both to the main terminal inflorescence at the top of the plant and to smaller flower clusters along lateral branches.

A cola comprises numerous bracts (small leaf-like structures), calyces, pistils, sugar leaves, and abundant glandular trichomes. It is the primary site of cannabinoid and terpene accumulation, determining the plant’s commercial and pharmacological value. Colas vary significantly in size, density, and shape depending on genetics, cultivation practices, and environmental conditions.

In cultivation, growers often train or prune plants to encourage multiple large colas rather than a single dominant one, aiming for increased yield and more uniform bud structure. Colas harvested from the top of the plant typically receive more light and may develop higher cannabinoid concentrations than lower buds.

Related terms: [Bracts] | [Inflorescence] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Testalize.me

Chemistry

Cannabis produces hundreds of chemical compounds that contribute to its effects, aromas, and potential therapeutic properties. These include cannabinoids, terpenes, flavonoids, and other secondary metabolites. Understanding these compounds is key to decoding cannabis varieties, breeding goals, and medical applications.

 

This section defines the major chemical categories and some of the most significant individual compounds found in cannabis.

Related terms: [Bracts] | [Inflorescence] | [Trichomes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Biosynthesis

Definition: The enzymatic formation of complex organic molecules from simpler precursors within living organisms.

In Cannabis, biosynthesis refers to the series of intracellular chemical reactions by which cannabinoids, terpenes, flavonoids, and other specialized metabolites are produced. These pathways occur primarily in the glandular trichomes and are tightly regulated by gene expression, enzymatic activity, developmental stage, and environmental conditions.

 

Cannabinoid biosynthesis begins with the condensation of olivetolic acid and geranyl pyrophosphate to form cannabigerolic acid (CBGA), the central precursor to major cannabinoids. CBGA is then enzymatically converted into compounds such as tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), and cannabichromenic acid (CBCA) by corresponding synthase enzymes¹. These reactions are oxygen-dependent and localized in the secretory cavity of capitate-stalked trichomes².

Terpenes are synthesized via the mevalonate and methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathways, which generate isoprenoid precursors like geranyl pyrophosphate and farnesyl pyrophosphate. These form the backbone for monoterpenes (e.g. limonene, pinene) and sesquiterpenes (e.g. caryophyllene)³. Terpene biosynthesis in cannabis often overlaps spatially and temporally with cannabinoid production, contributing to the plant’s chemotypic expression and ecological interactions.

 

The biosynthetic capacity of landrace populations varies significantly, reflecting long-term adaptation to local selection pressures. These populations may produce rare or chemotaxonomically distinctive compounds due to variation in gene copy number, allelic diversity, or trichome morphology⁴. Understanding biosynthetic pathways in situ is essential for conservation, breeding, and chemotype stabilization.

 

Related debates concern the stability of cannabinoid synthase genes across populations, the role of gene duplication events, and the potential for minor pathway branches to yield novel phytochemicals⁵.

​References:

  • Taura, F., et al. (2007). Cannabidiolic acid synthase from Cannabis sativa L.: cloning and functional expression in Pichia pastoris. Phytochemistry, 68(14), 2012–2021.

  • Livingston, S. J., et al. (2020). Cannabis glandular trichomes alter morphology and metabolite content during flower maturation. Plant Journal, 101(1), 37–56.

  • Booth, J. K., Page, J. E., & Bohlmann, J. (2017). Terpene synthases from Cannabis sativa. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0173911.

  • Vergara, D., et al. (2019). Genetic and genomic tools for Cannabis sativa. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 38(3), 285–312.

  • Zager, J. J., et al. (2019). Gene networks underlying cannabinoid and terpenoid accumulation in Cannabis. Plant Physiology, 180(4), 1877–1897.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Chemistry] | [Cannabinoid Profiles] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Cannabinoids

Cannabinoids are a group of structurally related terpenophenolic compounds found in Cannabis sativa L. They are responsible for the plant’s psychoactive, therapeutic and industrial properties and are chiefly produced in the glandular trichomes of female inflorescences [1][2].

Biosynthesis

All cannabinoids originate from a common precursor, cannabigerolic acid (CBGA), formed through the condensation of olivetolic acid and geranyl pyrophosphate [3]. Enzymatic pathways then convert CBGA into several major acidic cannabinoids, including:

  • Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) → precursor of psychoactive Δ9-THC

  • Cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) → precursor of non-intoxicating CBD

  • Cannabichromenic acid (CBCA) → precursor of CBC

 

These acidic cannabinoids undergo decarboxylation when exposed to heat, light, or aging, losing a CO₂ group to produce their neutral forms (e.g., THCA → THC) [3][4].

Major and Minor Cannabinoids

Over 100 distinct cannabinoids have been identified in Cannabis, each contributing uniquely to its chemical fingerprint [2][5]. Notable examples include:

  • Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) – principal psychoactive compound, acting as a partial agonist at CB1 and CB2 receptors [6].

  • Cannabidiol (CBD) – non-intoxicating, modulates THC effects, and has diverse pharmacological actions [6][7].

  • Cannabinol (CBN) – a mild psychoactive degradation product of THC, often found in aged material [4][8].

  • Tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) – exhibits CB1 receptor antagonism at low doses and agonism at higher doses, with potential appetite-suppressing effects [6][9].

  • Cannabigerol (CBG) – non-psychoactive, investigated for antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties [5][10].

  • Cannabidivarin (CBDV) – structurally similar to CBD, under study for anti-epileptic effects [9][11].

 

Chemotypic Variation

Cannabinoid profiles vary widely among cultivars due to genetics, environmental conditions, and cultivation practices [1][12]. This variation forms the basis for chemotype classification into:

  • Drug-type cannabis – high THC, low CBD

  • Fiber-type (hemp) cannabis – low THC, higher CBD

  • Intermediate chemotypes – balanced levels of THC and CBD [2][12]

 

These differences influence not only pharmacological effects but also legal status in various jurisdictions.

Pharmacological Activity

Cannabinoids exert effects primarily via the endocannabinoid system, interacting with CB1 and CB2 receptors in the central and peripheral nervous systems [6]. Their pharmacological actions include modulation of neurotransmitter release, pain perception, inflammation, appetite, and mood [6][7]. Emerging research also implicates non-cannabinoid targets, such as TRP channels and serotonin receptors, in their mechanisms of action [6].

Cannabinoid content and ratios are crucial parameters defining cannabis chemotypes and are central to both breeding strategies and consumer expectations in medical and recreational markets [12].

References:

[1] Small, E. (2015). Cannabis: A Complete Guide. CRC Press.
[2] ElSohly, M. A., & Gul, W. (2014). Constituents of Cannabis sativa. In Handbook of Cannabis (pp. 3–22). Oxford University Press.
[3] Potter, D. J. (2009). The propagation, characterisation and optimisation of Cannabis sativa L. as a phytopharmaceutical. Ph.D. Thesis, King’s College London.
[4] Radwan, M. M. et al. (2009). Biologically active cannabinoids from high-potency Cannabis sativa. Journal of Natural Products, 72(5), 906–911.
[5] Andre, C. M., Hausman, J. F., & Guerriero, G. (2016). Cannabis sativa: The Plant of the Thousand and One Molecules. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 19.
[6] Pertwee, R. G. (2008). The diverse CB1 and CB2 receptor pharmacology of three plant cannabinoids: Δ9-THC, cannabidiol and Δ9-THCV. British Journal of Pharmacology, 153(2), 199–215.
[7] Iffland, K., & Grotenhermen, F. (2017). An Update on Safety and Side Effects of Cannabidiol. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 2(1), 139–154.
[8] Turner, C. E., Elsohly, M. A., & Boeren, E. G. (1980). Constituents of Cannabis sativa L. XVII. A review of the natural constituents. Journal of Natural Products, 43(2), 169–234.
[9] Hillig, K. W., & Mahlberg, P. G. (2004). A chemotaxonomic analysis of cannabinoid variation in Cannabis. American Journal of Botany, 91(6), 966–975.
[10] Cascio, M. G., & Pertwee, R. G. (2014). Known pharmacological actions of nine non-Δ9-THC plant cannabinoids. Handbook of Cannabis, Oxford University Press.
[11] Hill, A. J. et al. (2013). Cannabidivarin is anticonvulsant in mouse and rat. British Journal of Pharmacology, 170(3), 679–692.
[12] Fischedick, J. T. (2017). Identification of terpenoid chemotypes among high (−)-trans-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-producing Cannabis sativa L. cultivars. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 2(1), 34–47.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Chemistry] | [Cannabinoid Profiles] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by GreenForce Staffing

Terpenes

Terpenes are volatile aromatic hydrocarbons found throughout the plant kingdom, including Cannabis sativa L. They contribute significantly to the plant’s aroma, flavor, and potentially its pharmacological properties. In cannabis, terpenes are synthesized and stored primarily in the glandular trichomes of flowers and to a lesser extent, in leaves and stems.¹ ² ³

Biosynthesis

Cannabis terpenes derive from two primary biochemical pathways:

  • The mevalonate pathway (MVA) operating in the cytosol

  • The methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway in plastids³⁴

 

These pathways produce isoprene units that polymerize to form monoterpenes (C₁₀), sesquiterpenes (C₁₅), and minor **diterpenes (C₂₀)**³.

 

Major Cannabis Terpenes

 

Over 200 terpenes have been detected in cannabis, but a smaller subset dominates most profiles:² ⁵

  • Myrcene: Earthy, musky aroma. Often the most abundant terpene in cannabis; may contribute sedative effects.⁵ ⁶
     

  • Limonene: Citrus aroma; under investigation for anxiolytic and immunomodulatory effects.⁵ ⁷
     

  • β-Caryophyllene: Spicy, peppery notes; unique as a terpene that also acts as a CB2 receptor agonist.² ⁸
     

  • Linalool: Floral, lavender scent; studied for sedative and anxiolytic properties.⁵ ⁹
     

  • α-Pinene: Pine aroma; proposed cognitive-enhancing and bronchodilatory effects.⁷ ¹⁰
     

  • Humulene: Woody, earthy character; may possess anti-inflammatory activity.⁵ ⁸
     

  • Terpinolene: Complex piney, herbal scent; less studied, often found in trace amounts.⁵

 

Variation Among Cultivars

Terpene profiles vary widely between cannabis cultivars, influenced by genetics, environment, and cultivation methods. Fischedick identified distinct terpenoid chemotypes among THC-rich cultivars, suggesting terpene ratios can serve as markers for cultivar differentiation, complementing cannabinoid analysis.⁴ ¹¹

Environmental factors such as light intensity, nutrient availability, and stress conditions also influence terpene synthesis. For example, terpene concentrations can decrease under high humidity during drying, or increase under mild drought stress.⁴ ¹²

 

Pharmacological Relevance

Terpenes have drawn scientific interest for potential synergistic effects with cannabinoids, a hypothesis sometimes called the “entourage effect”. While definitive evidence in humans remains limited, preclinical research suggests terpenes may modulate:² ⁶

  • Neurotransmission

  • Inflammation

  • Pain perception

  • Mood and anxiety states⁶⁹

 

β-Caryophyllene, notably, interacts directly with the endocannabinoid system as a CB2 receptor agonist. Other terpenes act on ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors, such as GABA, serotonin, and TRP channels.⁶ ⁸ ¹⁰

 

Role in Consumer Experience

Beyond pharmacology, terpenes shape cannabis’ organoleptic properties like its smell, taste and perceived freshness. These sensory attributes influence consumer preferences and market value. For instance, “fuel,” “fruity,” or “earthy” aromatic profiles are tied to particular terpene combinations and contribute to cultivar branding.⁵ ¹¹ ¹³

In traditional hashish production, differing processing methods (e.g., hand-rubbing vs. dry sieving) affect terpene retention, with implications for both aroma and psychoactive perception.¹⁴

Terpenes are central to defining cannabis typicity, contributing to terroir expression and cultural narratives surrounding regional cannabis products.¹⁵

References:

  1. Small, E. (2015). Cannabis: A Complete Guide. CRC Press.

  2. Russo, E. B. (2011). Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. British Journal of Pharmacology, 163(7), 1344–1364.

  3. Andre, C. M., Hausman, J. F., & Guerriero, G. (2016). Cannabis sativa: The Plant of the Thousand and One Molecules. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 19.

  4. Potter, D. J. (2009). The propagation, characterisation and optimisation of Cannabis sativa L. as a phytopharmaceutical. Ph.D. Thesis, King’s College London.

  5. Fischedick, J. T. (2017). Identification of terpenoid chemotypes among high (−)-trans-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-producing Cannabis sativa L. cultivars. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 2(1), 34–47.

  6. Nuutinen, T. (2018). Medicinal properties of terpenes found in Cannabis sativa and Humulus lupulus. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 157, 198–228.

  7. Booth, J. K., Page, J. E., & Bohlmann, J. (2017). Terpene synthases from Cannabis sativa. PLoS One, 12(3), e0173911.

  8. Gertsch, J. et al. (2008). Beta-caryophyllene is a dietary cannabinoid. PNAS, 105(26), 9099–9104.

  9. Peana, A. T. et al. (2002). Anti-inflammatory activity of linalool and linalyl acetate. Planta Medica, 68(08), 700–704.

  10. Salehi, B. et al. (2019). Therapeutic potential of α- and β-pinene: A miracle gift of nature. Biomolecules, 9(11), 738.

  11. Fischedick, J. T. (2017). Chemotaxonomic analysis of terpenoid variation in Cannabis sativa L. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 2(1), 34–47.

  12. Caplan, D. et al. (2017). Increasing terpene yield in medical cannabis. Industrial Crops and Products, 107, 587–592.

  13. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  14. Chouvy, P.-A., & Macfarlane, J. (2018). Agricultural innovations in Morocco’s cannabis industry. International Journal of Drug Policy, 58, 85–91.

  15. Chouvy, P.-A. (2022). Cannabis terroirs: From geography to culture. GeoJournal, 87, 399–415.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Chemistry] | [Terpene Profiles] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Paul Einerhand

Other Compounds

While cannabinoids and terpenes dominate discussions of cannabis chemistry, the plant produces a broad array of other secondary metabolites that contribute to its biological functions, sensory qualities, and potential pharmacological effects.¹ ²

These compounds are often less abundant but can play important roles in plant defense, flavor, aroma, and human health applications.²

Flavonoids

Flavonoids are polyphenolic compounds widely distributed in plants, including cannabis. Approximately two dozen flavonoids have been identified in Cannabis sativa L., contributing to pigmentation, UV protection, and possible health effects.³ ⁴

Key examples include:

  • Cannflavins A, B, and C: Unique to cannabis; exhibit anti-inflammatory properties by inhibiting prostaglandin E₂ production.⁴ ⁵
     

  • Quercetin: Found in many plants; has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and potential anti-cancer effects.⁶
     

  • Apigenin: Possesses anxiolytic properties, potentially modulating GABAergic activity.⁷

 

Cannflavins, in particular, are considered potential leads for novel non-cannabinoid therapeutic compounds.⁵

Stilbenoids

Stilbenoids are a small class of phenolic compounds also reported in cannabis, though data remain limited. They may contribute minor antioxidant activity, but their pharmacological relevance in cannabis is not fully characterized.⁸

Alkaloids

Although cannabis is not a major alkaloid producer, trace levels of nitrogen-containing compounds have been reported⁹. These may include small amounts of choline derivatives or other amines, but their concentrations and significance are negligible compared to alkaloid-rich plants like poppies or coca.⁹

Sterols and Triterpenes

Cannabis contains phytosterols and triterpenoids, which may contribute to health-promoting properties such as cholesterol-lowering effects and anti-inflammatory activity. Examples include:¹⁰

  • β-Sitosterol: A plant sterol studied for cholesterol modulation and anti-inflammatory effects.¹⁰

  • Lupeol: A triterpene with reported antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.¹¹

 

These compounds are often present in leaves, seeds, and resin but at relatively low concentrations¹⁰.

Sugars, Amino Acids, and Other Metabolites

Like all plants, cannabis synthesizes a diverse range of primary metabolites essential for basic cellular processes. While not unique to cannabis, compounds such as:

  • Simple sugars (glucose, fructose, sucrose)

  • Amino acids (including essential amino acids)

  • Organic acids (malic acid, citric acid)

 

…contribute to the nutritional profile of cannabis seeds and leaves, which have historically been consumed as food in some cultures.¹² ¹³

Phenolic Compounds

Cannabis produces various phenolic compounds beyond flavonoids, including simple phenolic acids like ferulic acid and caffeic acid, which have antioxidant properties. These compounds may play minor roles in the plant’s defense system and contribute subtle nuances to taste and aroma.¹⁴

Potential Synergistic Roles

Although cannabinoids and terpenes are the primary bioactive constituents, there is growing interest in how other cannabis metabolites may influence the entourage effect, either by modulating cannabinoid pharmacodynamics or contributing independent health benefits.² ⁵

However, research into non-cannabinoid, non-terpene compounds remains comparatively underdeveloped, and definitive evidence for major pharmacological impacts in cannabis use is still emerging.² ⁵

References:

  1. Andre, C. M., Hausman, J. F., & Guerriero, G. (2016). Cannabis sativa: The Plant of the Thousand and One Molecules. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 19.

  2. Small, E. (2015). Cannabis: A Complete Guide. CRC Press.

  3. Flores-Sanchez, I. J., & Verpoorte, R. (2008). Secondary metabolism in cannabis. Phytochemistry Reviews, 7, 615–639.

  4. Barrett, M. L. et al. (1986). Cannflavin A and B, prenylated flavones from Cannabis sativa L. Planta Medica, 48(3), 197–198.

  5. Appendino, G. et al. (2008). Antiinflammatory activity of prenylated flavonoids from Cannabis sativa. Journal of Natural Products, 71(8), 1427–1430.

  6. Boots, A. W. et al. (2008). Health effects of quercetin: From antioxidant to nutraceutical. European Journal of Pharmacology, 585(2-3), 325–337.

  7. Avallone, R. et al. (2000). Benzodiazepine-like molecules in plants: Apigenin binding to central benzodiazepine receptors. Life Sciences, 67(26), 3063–3070.

  8. El-Feraly, F. S. et al. (1984). Stilbenes in Cannabis sativa. Journal of Natural Products, 47(2), 290–293.

  9. Turner, C. E. et al. (1978). Constituents of Cannabis sativa L. Journal of Natural Products, 41(4), 494–504.

  10. Guil-Guerrero, J. L. et al. (2013). Fatty acids and sterols in the seed oil from twelve Cannabis sativa L. cultivars. Food Chemistry, 136(1), 9–15.

  11. Saleem, M. (2009). Lupeol, a novel anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer dietary triterpene. Cancer Letters, 285(2), 109–115.

  12. Callaway, J. C. (2004). Hempseed as a nutritional resource: An overview. Euphytica, 140(1-2), 65–72.

  13. Leizer, C. et al. (2000). The composition of hemp seed oil and its potential as an important source of nutrition. Journal of Nutraceuticals, Functional & Medical Foods, 2(4), 35–53.

  14. Flores-Sanchez, I. J., & Verpoorte, R. (2008). Secondary metabolism in cannabis. Phytochemistry Reviews, 7, 615–639.

  15. Russo, E. B. (2011). Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. British Journal of Pharmacology, 163(7), 1344–1364.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Elsa Olofsson

Cannabinoid profile

A cannabinoid profile refers to the specific balance and relative proportions of cannabinoids in a cannabis sample. The plant’s chemotype underlies this profile and it is crucial for predicting how cannabis may affect human physiology and subjective experience.¹ ²

While cannabis produces dozens of cannabinoids, user experiences and therapeutic effects are often shaped most strongly by the ratio of THC to CBD and to a lesser degree, the presence of other minor cannabinoids.³ ⁴

Types of Cannabinoid Profiles and Perceived Effects

Type I – THC-Dominant

  • High THC, low CBD

  • Often produces pronounced psychoactive effects: euphoria, altered time perception, increased appetite, and heightened sensory perception.⁵

  • Associated with potential side effects like anxiety, paranoia, or short-term memory impairment, especially in inexperienced users.⁵ ⁶

 

Type II – Balanced THC:CBD

  • Significant levels of both THC and CBD, often in roughly equal proportions.

  • Many users and clinicians report a “milder high,” reduced anxiety, and better functional clarity compared to pure THC products.⁵ ⁶

  • Favored in medical contexts for patients seeking symptom relief with fewer cognitive or psychological side effects.⁶

 

Type III – CBD-Dominant

  • High CBD, very low THC (<0.3–1%).

  • Produces minimal psychoactive effect but may promote relaxation, reduce anxiety, and provide anti-inflammatory benefits.⁷

  • Increasingly used for pediatric epilepsy and other conditions where intoxication is undesirable.⁸

 

Type IV – CBG-Dominant

  • Dominated by cannabigerol (CBG).

  • Reports suggest potential benefits for inflammation, appetite stimulation, and antibacterial activity, though subjective psychoactive effects appear mild or absent. ⁹

 

Subjective Differences in Experience

 

Cannabinoid profiles substantially shape how users describe their experience:

  • THC-rich products are typically associated with intense euphoria, creativity, and sociability, but also greater risk of anxiety or panic in some individuals.⁵ ⁶

  • CBD presence can modulate THC’s effects, often described as “taking the edge off” the high, reducing anxiety, and lessening cognitive impairment. ⁶

  • Balanced THC:CBD chemotypes are frequently described as delivering a more controlled, clear-headed experience.⁶

  • Minor cannabinoids such as THCV or CBG might subtly alter the psychoactive profile, contributing unique sensations like appetite suppression (THCV) or perceived calmness (CBG), although human data remain limited.⁹ ¹⁰

 

These subjective differences contribute to user preferences for specific strains or products and influence medical recommendations in clinical settings.

 

Variability and Predictability

 

Despite efforts to categorize cannabinoid profiles, significant variability exists due to genetics, cultivation conditions, and post-harvest handling. Even plants from the same genetic line can show shifts in cannabinoid ratios under differing:

  • UV-B exposure

  • Nutrient availability

  • Water stress

  • Harvest timing² ⁴

 

Consequently, two samples labeled “high-THC” can produce noticeably different subjective effects if their minor cannabinoid or terpene profiles diverge.

Chemotype as Market Differentiator

In legal markets, cannabinoid profiles have become central to product labeling, consumer education, and marketing. Terms like “Indica” or “Sativa” are increasingly being replaced or supplemented by chemotype-based descriptions (e.g. “high-THC, low-CBD”). ¹¹

However, there remains a gap between lab-tested cannabinoid ratios and consistent prediction of user experience. Researchers emphasize that other factors (especially terpenes and minor cannabinoids) further modulate effects, contributing to the so-called **“entourage effect”**.³ ¹¹ 

References:

  1. Small, E. (2015). Cannabis: A Complete Guide. CRC Press.

  2. Chandra, S. et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  3. Russo, E. B. (2011). Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. British Journal of Pharmacology, 163(7), 1344–1364.

  4. Booth, J. K., & Bohlmann, J. (2019). Terpenes in Cannabis sativa – From plant genome to humans. Plant Science, 284, 67–72.

  5. Curran, H. V. et al. (2016). Which biological and self-report measures of cannabis use predict cannabis dependency and acute psychotic-like effects? Addiction, 111(10), 1806-1816.

  6. Bhattacharyya, S. et al. (2010). Opposite effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human brain function and psychopathology. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(3), 764–774.

  7. Zuardi, A. W. et al. (2017). Cannabidiol: from an inactive cannabinoid to a drug with wide spectrum of action. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 39(2), 153–160.

  8. Devinsky, O. et al. (2017). Trial of Cannabidiol for Drug-Resistant Seizures in the Dravet Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine, 376, 2011–2020.

  9. Cascini, F. et al. (2019). Cannabigerol: Pharmacological and therapeutic potential. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 23(6), 2508–2513.

  10. Hill, A. J. et al. (2010). Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabivarin suppresses in vitro epileptiform activity and in vivo seizures in rat models. Epilepsia, 51(8), 1522–1532.

  11. Hazekamp, A. (2018). The Trouble with CBD Oil. Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids, 1(1), 65–72.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by 2H Media

Terpene profile

Definition: A terpene profile refers to the specific identity and relative proportions of terpenes found in a particular cannabis sample.

 

While cannabis can produce over 200 different terpenes, usually only a dozen or so appear in significant quantities, typically ranging from ~0.1% to 3% of the dried flower’s weight.¹ ² This profile shapes the plant’s distinctive aroma and flavor and is widely marketed as influencing how a strain might “feel,” though scientific evidence connecting terpenes directly to psychoactive effects in humans remains limited.³ ⁴

Different cannabis cultivars often show characteristic terpene signatures. For instance, some high-myrcene profiles deliver earthy, musky aromas, while limonene-dominant profiles produce bright citrus scents. Growers and brands increasingly list terpene profiles on product labels as consumers seek alternatives to broad “Indica” or “Sativa” labels, looking instead for specific aromatic or experiential cues.⁵

Terpenes are biologically active compounds and studies have documented effects like sedation (myrcene), mood elevation (limonene), or mental clarity (pinene). However, typical terpene concentrations in smoked cannabis are often too low to produce significant pharmacological effects alone and studies confirming these influences are sparse.⁴ ⁶ This fuels debate over the entourage effect, the idea that cannabinoids and terpenes work synergistically to shape cannabis’s psychoactive profile. While intriguing, this theory remains unproven at usual consumption levels.⁷

Terpene profiles are highly variable, even within the same genetic cultivar. Environmental factors (like UV exposure, soil composition, and water availability) can shift terpene expression significantly. Post-harvest processes also matter: drying at high temperatures can degrade volatile compounds like myrcene and linalool, leading to muted aroma and potential changes in perceived effects.⁴

Long before modern labs measured terpene profiles, traditional cannabis cultures classified resin and flower by aroma, stickiness, and the subjective feel of the high. In places like Himachal Pradesh or Morocco’s Rif, people recognized distinctions reminiscent of what modern science now measures as terpene variation.⁸ Today, terpene profiles have become a major marketing tool, used to differentiate products and justify higher prices, sometimes without sufficient scientific backing for the claimed effects.⁵ ⁹

While terpene profiles are a valuable tool for understanding cannabis’s sensory diversity, researchers caution that no reliable “terpene fingerprint” guarantees consistent effects across users. Aroma can hint at certain traits, but individual physiology, dosage and other cannabinoids often play larger roles in determining how a particular cannabis product feels.⁴ ⁶

References:

  1. Small, E. (2015). Cannabis: A Complete Guide. CRC Press.

  2. Clarke, R.C., & Merlin, M.D. (2016). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. Univ. of California Press.

  3. Russo, E. B. (2011). Taming THC: Potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. British Journal of Pharmacology, 163(7), 1344–1364.

  4. Booth, J.K., & Bohlmann, J. (2019). Terpenes in Cannabis sativa – From plant genome to humans. Plant Science, 284, 67–72.

  5. Hazekamp, A. (2018). The Trouble with CBD Oil. Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids, 1(1), 65–72.

  6. Hill, A.J., et al. (2010). Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabivarin suppresses in vitro epileptiform activity and in vivo seizures in rat models. Epilepsia, 51(8), 1522–1532.

  7. Sarne, Y. (2019). Cannabis and cannabinoids in brain function and disease. Pharmacological Research, 147, 104363.

  8. Chouvy, P.-A., & Macfarlane, J. (2018). Cannabis cultivation in the world’s Himalayan borderlands. GeoJournal, 83(3), 595–611.

  9. Hazekamp, A., et al. (2016). Cannabis: From cultivar to chemovar II—a metabolomics approach to cannabis classification. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 1(1), 202–215.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

IMG_20241201_151122.jpg

Cultivation

Cultivation refers to the entire life cycle of growing cannabis, encompassing biological stages, environmental management and cultural practices. From germinating seeds to harvesting mature flowers, cultivation shapes a plant’s morphology, chemical profile, yield, and ultimately the sensory and psychoactive qualities of the final product.

 

While modern cannabis growing draws on agricultural science, it is also deeply influenced by regional traditions, clandestine adaptations under prohibition, and evolving commercial demands. Cultivation decisions (like when to prune, how to irrigate, or what soil amendments to use) can profoundly affect cannabinoid and terpene expression, plant health and crop uniformity.

Key cultivation practices include understanding plant developmental stages (germination, seedling, vegetative growth, flowering, senescence), managing sexual expression and hermaphroditism, employing training and pruning techniques and implementing integrated pest management (IPM). Choices in soil composition, nutrient regimes, and organic versus synthetic approaches further define cultivation style and outcomes.

Traditional cultivation of landrace cannabis varieties often differs markedly from contemporary methods used in controlled indoor facilities. In landrace contexts, cultivation is shaped by local climate, cultural norms, and historical knowledge, producing plants adapted to specific terroirs. By contrast, modern commercial growers may manipulate every parameter (from light spectrum to humidity) to optimize consistency and chemical profiles.

This glossary section defines the main concepts, techniques, and considerations that make up cannabis cultivation, both as a science and as a cultural practice.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

180510_SeedStack3C-559156290.jpg

Germination

Germination is the first stage in the cannabis life cycle, marking the transition from a dormant seed to an actively growing plant. During germination, the seed absorbs moisture, swells, and enzymatic processes activate, triggering the embryonic root (radicle) to emerge. This root anchors the seedling and begins nutrient and water uptake, followed by the shoot pushing upward to form the seedling’s first leaves (cotyledons).¹

 

Cannabis seeds typically require warmth (around 20–25°C), consistent moisture, and oxygen to germinate successfully. Excess water can cause seeds to rot, while dryness can halt the process entirely. Germination methods include placing seeds between moist paper towels, sowing directly into soil, or using specialized starter cubes or plugs.²

Most seeds sprout within 2–7 days, though some landrace varieties can be slower due to thicker seed coats or natural dormancy mechanisms. Once germinated, seedlings should receive gentle light and careful watering to avoid damping-off diseases a fungal condition that can kill young sprouts.³

Germination success rates can vary depending on seed age, storage conditions, and genetic vigor. Fresh, properly stored seeds from reputable sources generally show high viability.

Proper germination sets the foundation for healthy growth, influencing uniformity, vigor, potential yield and chemical profile of the mature plant.

References:

  1. Chandra, S. et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  2. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  3. Potter, D. J. (2009). The propagation, cultivation and processing of cannabis. In ElSohly, M. A. (Ed.), Marijuana and the Cannabinoids. Humana Press.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Mubinuddoula Arefin

Seedling stage

The seedling stage in cannabis cultivation follows germination and spans roughly the first two to three weeks of a plant’s life. During this period, the plant develops its first true leaves and establishes the initial root system necessary for further growth.¹

A cannabis seedling emerges bearing two small, rounded leaves called cotyledons. These serve as temporary energy reserves and gradually give way to the first sets of true leaves, which display the plant’s characteristic serrated edges. Each subsequent leaf set typically develops more blades, signaling healthy progression.²

Seedlings are delicate and highly sensitive to environmental stress. Key factors for success include:

  • Light: Seedlings require gentle yet adequate light (usually around 200–400 µmol/m²/s for indoor cultivation) to encourage sturdy growth without causing heat stress or stretching (elongated stems).³
     

  • Humidity: Relative humidity between 60–70% helps prevent moisture loss while roots develop.⁴
     

  • Temperature: Optimal temperatures generally range between 20–25°C.⁴
     

  • Watering: Overwatering is a common error. Seedlings prefer lightly moist, well-aerated media. Watering should be minimal but consistent to avoid damping-off, a fungal disease that can kill young plants.³
     

  • Nutrients: Nutrient levels should be low at this stage, as seedlings are easily burned by excessive fertilizer. Most high-quality seed-starting media contain enough nutrition for the first week or two.⁴

 

By the end of the seedling stage, a healthy cannabis plant typically has several nodes of true leaves and a small but robust root system, ready to transition into vegetative growth. Early care during this period significantly influences plant vigor, resistance to stress, and eventual yield.²

References:

  1. Chandra, S. et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  2. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  3. Potter, D. J. (2009). The propagation, cultivation and processing of cannabis. In ElSohly, M. A. (Ed.), Marijuana and the Cannabinoids. Humana Press.

  4. Caplan, D. et al. (2017). Vegetative propagation of Cannabis sativa by stem cuttings: effects of leaf number, cutting position, rooting hormone, and leaf tip removal. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 97(3), 393–403.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049600.jpg

Vegetative growth

The vegetative stage is the period of active growth in cannabis cultivation that follows the seedling stage and precedes flowering. During this phase, the plant focuses on developing leaves, stems, and roots, building the structure necessary to support future flowering.¹

Vegetative growth usually begins around the third week after germination and can last anywhere from two to twelve weeks, depending on the cultivar and the grower’s objectives. In photoperiod-sensitive varieties, the plant stays in the vegetative phase as long as daily light exceeds about 14 to 16 hours.²

At this stage, cannabis plants produce increasingly complex leaf pairs, expanding their photosynthetic surface to fuel rapid growth. Stem elongation accelerates, and lateral branches form, shaping the plant’s final size and structure. Internodal spacing varies with genetics and light conditions. Roots also expand vigorously to meet growing water and nutrient demands.³

Growers often manage environmental factors closely during vegetative growth. Indoor cultivators use intense light (typically LED fixtures) to encourage compact, robust plants with light cycles ranging from 18 to 24 hours daily. Ideal temperatures fall between 22 and 28°C with relative humidity around 50 to 70 percent. Nutrient needs increase significantly during this phase, especially for nitrogen, which supports leaf and stem production.⁴ Watering also becomes more frequent, but growers avoid waterlogged conditions to protect root health.

Training techniques like low-stress training (LST), topping, and pruning are commonly performed during vegetative growth. These practices help control plant height, encourage lateral branching, and improve light penetration, ultimately supporting better yields in the flowering stage.⁴

Healthy vegetative growth sets the foundation for successful flowering. Plants that struggle during this stage often show stunted growth, weak stems, or reduced yield potential.¹

For more information on vegging landrace cannabis plants, please refer to our growing guide by clicking on the link here.

References:

  1. Chandra, S. et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  2. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  3. Potter, D. J. (2009). The propagation, cultivation and processing of cannabis. In ElSohly, M. A. (Ed.), Marijuana and the Cannabinoids. Humana Press.

  4. Caplan, D. et al. (2017). Vegetative propagation of Cannabis sativa by stem cuttings: effects of leaf number, cutting position, rooting hormone, and leaf tip removal. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 97(3), 393–403.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Ryan Lange

Flowering stage

Definition: The flowering stage is the reproductive phase in the cannabis life cycle, when plants transition from vegetative growth to producing their sexual organs - the inflorescences (flower clusters) that ultimately contain cannabinoids and terpenes.¹

Photoperiod and Flower Initiation

In photoperiod-sensitive cannabis types, flowering begins when plants receive longer periods of uninterrupted darkness, usually around 12 hours per day.² This light signal triggers hormonal changes that shift growth from leaf production to floral development.³ Indoor growers replicate this by switching light schedules to 12 hours on, 12 hours off.

Some tropical landraces flower more gradually and are less sensitive to day length, which is why certain varieties from equatorial regions may require longer flowering times to mature fully.⁴

Floral Development and Chemistry

As flowering progresses, female plants produce clusters of bracts and pistils that form dense buds. During this stage, resin glands (trichomes) become highly active, synthesizing cannabinoids such as THC and CBD, as well as terpenes like myrcene, limonene, and pinene.⁵ Environmental factors such as light spectrum, temperature, and nutrient availability influence both trichome density and the chemical composition of the flowers.

Terpene production often peaks toward late flowering, contributing to the distinctive aromas and potential therapeutic properties of different cultivars. However, scientific evidence for terpenes significantly altering psychoactive effects in typical flower consumption remains limited.⁶

Harvest Timing

Flowering duration varies by cultivar from as few as 7–9 weeks in modern hybrids to over 28 weeks in certain tropical landraces. Growers often examine trichome color under magnification to decide harvest time. Clear trichomes indicate immaturity, cloudy or milky trichomes signal peak potency, while amber trichomes suggest THC degradation to compounds like cannabinol (CBN), which may produce more sedative effects.

 

Proper harvest timing is crucial for balancing cannabinoid potency, terpene preservation, and desired psychoactive effects. Harvesting too early reduces yield and potency; too late can lead to loss of flavor and a shift in effect profile.

The flowering stage ultimately defines the commercial and pharmacological value of the cannabis crop and demands careful environmental control, cultivar-specific knowledge and precise timing for optimal results.

For more information on flowering landrace cannabis plants, please refer to our growing guide by clicking on the link here

References:

  1. Chandra, S. et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  2. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  3. Potter, D. J. (2009). The propagation, cultivation and processing of cannabis. In ElSohly, M. A. (Ed.), Marijuana and the Cannabinoids. Humana Press.

  4. Caplan, D. et al. (2017). Vegetative propagation of Cannabis sativa by stem cuttings: effects of leaf number, cutting position, rooting hormone, and leaf tip removal. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 97(3), 393–403.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Senescence

Senescence in cannabis refers to the natural aging process that occurs as plants approach the end of their life cycle.¹ Physiologically, it’s marked by chlorophyll degradation, leaf yellowing (chlorosis), and nutrient remobilization from older tissues into reproductive structures like flowers or seeds.² ³ While this is a normal phase, premature or excessive senescence in a crop can reduce photosynthetic efficiency and diminish yields and cannabinoid quality.³

As senescence progresses, the biochemical profile of cannabis changes. Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) can oxidize into cannabinol (CBN), contributing to a more sedative effect profile.⁴ Terpene concentrations also decline through enzymatic breakdown or volatilization, affecting aroma and flavor.⁴ Controlled senescence management (adjusting nutrient inputs, irrigation, and harvest timing) is crucial for preserving cannabinoid potency and desirable sensory attributes.² ⁴

Senescence also helps reduce chlorophyll levels in harvested flower, which can improve smoking qualities by lowering harsh, grassy flavors.⁵ In seed crops, senescence signals seed maturation, crucial for achieving proper moisture content and storage viability.

References:

  1. Taiz, L., et al. (2015). Plant Physiology and Development.

  2. Chandra, S., et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology.

  3. Saloner, A., & Bernstein, N. (2020). Impact of mineral nutrition on cannabis productivity. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 1–14.

  4. Potter, D. J. (2009). The propagation, characterisation and optimisation of cannabis sativa L. as a phytopharmaceutical. PhD thesis, King’s College London.

  5. Clarke, R. C. (1998). Hashish!. Red Eye Press.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001079.jpg

Sexual Expression

Cannabis is a dioecious species, meaning individual plants are typically either male or female, each producing distinct reproductive organs.¹ However, it also exhibits significant sexual plasticity, where environmental or genetic factors can shift plants toward male, female, or mixed (hermaphroditic) floral expression.²

Male plants develop small, pollen-bearing structures called staminate flowers, clustered in loose panicles. Their primary biological role is pollen dispersal.³ Conversely, female plants produce pistillate flowers arranged in dense clusters (inflorescences or colas), forming the resinous “buds” valued for cannabinoid and terpene production.³

Sexual differentiation in cannabis is typically visible 3–6 weeks into vegetative growth, especially under photoperiod cues. Early indicators include preflowers at leaf axils:

  • Males develop small, ball-like structures without pistils.

  • Females show calyxes with protruding white stigmas.³ ⁴

 

Several factors can influence sexual expression:

  • Photoperiod: Short-day conditions accelerate flowering and can affect sex ratios in seed-grown populations.²

  • Stress factors: Physical damage, irregular light cycles, or nutrient imbalances can induce hermaphroditism.⁵

  • Genetics: Some cultivars are more prone to intersex expression than others.² ⁵

 

Hermaphroditism is a form of sexual expression where plants develop both male and female flowers on the same individual. This can lead to self-pollination, resulting in seeded flowers and reduced commercial value.⁵ While hermaphroditism can be naturally occurring, it’s often viewed negatively in modern cultivation due to its impact on cannabinoid yield and quality.⁵

In cultivation, sex determination is crucial. Growers cultivating seedless cannabis remove male plants early to prevent pollination, thereby maximizing resin production in unfertilized female flowers.³

Understanding sexual expression helps growers manage genetic lines, optimize yields, and prevent accidental seed production, especially in commercial operations.² ³ ⁵

References:

  1. Small, E. (2015). Cannabis: A Complete Guide. CRC Press.

  2. Chandra, S., et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  3. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  4. Potter, D. J. (2009). The propagation, characterisation and optimisation of cannabis sativa L. as a phytopharmaceutical. PhD thesis, King’s College London.

  5. Green, G. (2005). The Cannabis Grow Bible. Green Candy Press.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Hermaphrodite-Cannabis-1-scaled-3425547573.jpg

Hermaphroditism

Hermaphroditism in cannabis describes the occurrence of both male and female reproductive structures on the same plant. In botanical terms, such plants produce staminate (pollen-producing) and pistillate (seed-producing) flowers simultaneously.¹ ² This reflects the inherent sexual plasticity of the species, an evolutionary trait allowing reproduction even when isolated.³

There are two main types of hermaphroditism in cannabis. True hermaphrodites are plants genetically predisposed to develop both male and female flowers from an early stage, often distributed relatively evenly across the plant. In contrast, stress-induced hermaphrodites are genetically female plants that develop male flowers in response to environmental stresses, such as disruptions in the dark cycle, physical damage, nutrient imbalances, extreme temperatures, or pest attacks.⁴ ⁵

Genetics plays a significant role in hermaphroditism. Certain cultivars, especially those bred without rigorous selection pressure, exhibit higher tendencies toward intersex traits.³ ⁶ However, environmental stress remains the most common trigger in modern cultivation. Light leaks during the dark period are a notorious cause, as are physical injuries during flowering, chemical treatments like some plant growth regulators, and severe heat or drought conditions.⁵

From a cultivation perspective, hermaphroditism poses substantial challenges. Male flowers can release pollen that fertilizes female flowers, leading to seeded buds rather than seedless “sinsemilla.” Seeded flowers generally have lower cannabinoid concentrations, diminished resin production, and less desirable texture and aroma, significantly reducing commercial value.⁴ Consequently, growers closely monitor flowering plants for any signs of male structures and remove them promptly to prevent pollination.⁵

Breeding programs also view hermaphroditism as a critical concern. Plants showing intersex traits are typically excluded from breeding to avoid transmitting this characteristic to future generations.³ ⁶ While some traditional cannabis cultures tolerated low levels of hermaphroditism, particularly in landrace populations, modern legal markets strongly select against it to preserve crop quality and consistency.⁶

References:

  1. Small, E. (2015). Cannabis: A Complete Guide. CRC Press.

  2. Chandra, S., et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  3. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  4. Potter, D. J. (2009). The propagation, characterisation and optimisation of cannabis sativa L. as a phytopharmaceutical. PhD thesis, King’s College London.

  5. Green, G. (2005). The Cannabis Grow Bible. Green Candy Press.

  6. McPartland, J. M. (2017). Cannabis botany and horticulture. In Pertwee, R. G. (Ed.), Handbook of Cannabis. Oxford University Press.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001086.jpg

Apical Dominance

Definition: The hormonal regulation by which the main shoot of a plant suppresses the growth of lateral branches.

In cannabis, apical dominance is primarily controlled by auxins synthesized at the shoot apex. These auxins suppress axillary bud outgrowth by modulating the transport and concentration of cytokinins and strigolactones in lower nodes¹. This hierarchical growth pattern leads to a pronounced central stalk and fewer lateral branches, a trait commonly observed in feral or uncultivated landrace populations adapted to high-density or competitive environments².

Manipulating apical dominance through practices like topping or low-stress training (LST) disrupts this hormonal gradient, encouraging lateral growth and multiple colas. This is especially relevant in controlled cultivation systems aiming to maximise flower sites, light exposure, or plant uniformity. However, in traditional field-grown landrace cultivation, especially in regions reliant on open pollination and natural selection, apical dominance may contribute to wind resistance, structural stability, and competitive height gain³.

The degree of apical dominance varies by genotype. For example, highland populations from Nepal and Himachal Pradesh often exhibit strong apical control with minimal natural branching, while some tropical or equatorial populations may show more relaxed dominance patterns due to environmental selection pressures favouring lateral spread. Cultivation practices should account for this variability to avoid stress responses or unwanted morphological outcomes.

References:

  1. Leyser, O. (2009). The control of shoot branching: an example of plant information processing. Plant, Cell & Environment, 32(6), 694–703.

  2. Chandra, S., et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  3. Caplan, D., et al. (2017). Vegetative propagation of Cannabis sativa by stem cuttings: effects of apical vs. basal cuttings and rooting hormones. HortScience, 52(5), 639–644.

Related terms: [Topping] | [Plant Training] | [Phenotype] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

FB_IMG_1620057232655.jpg

Topping

Definition: The horticultural practice of removing the apical shoot to alter a cannabis plant’s growth pattern.

Topping involves cutting the main stem's terminal meristem during vegetative growth to interrupt apical dominance and encourage the development of multiple lateral branches. This redirection of growth can result in a broader, bushier plant structure with more colas and improved canopy distribution, particularly in high-light environments or indoor setups where vertical space is limited.

The technique exploits the plant’s hormonal regulation, specifically the redistribution of auxins and cytokinins, to stimulate axillary bud development below the cut site¹. In photoperiod-sensitive landraces with extended vegetative phases, topping may delay flowering onset and is often used cautiously to avoid inducing stress responses or altering the plant’s natural morphology. In contrast, vigorous, broadleaf-type plants with indeterminate growth can respond favorably, especially when environmental conditions and nutrient availability support robust regrowth².

Topping is distinct from other pruning methods like fimming or lollipopping, though these are sometimes confused in colloquial usage. In field settings, traditional landrace farmers rarely practice topping, as the emphasis is on plant hardiness and resin yield rather than canopy manipulation³.

Topping is best performed with sanitized tools early in the vegetative stage when the plant has at least four to six nodes and is actively growing.

 

Improper topping (such as during flowering, under drought stress, or with slow-recovering genotypes) can result in stunted growth or hermaphroditic traits in sensitive lines⁴.

References:

  1. Taiz, L., et al. (2015). Plant Physiology and Development. Sinauer Associates.

  2. Potter, D. J. (2009). The propagation, cultivation and processing of cannabis. In Cannabis and Cannabinoids (ElSohly, M.A., ed.), Humana Press.

  3. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  4. Caplan, D., et al. (2017). Vegetative propagation of Cannabis sativa by stem cuttings: effects of rooting hormones and leaf retention. HortScience, 52(8), 1084–1089.

Related terms: [Apical Dominance] | [Pruning] | [Canopy Management] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by CRYSTALWEED cannabis

Plant training

Plant training in cannabis cultivation refers to an array of horticultural techniques used to deliberately alter a plant’s shape, size, and growth pattern to improve yield, optimize light exposure, or manage plant height in restricted spaces.¹ ² It represents a core part of modern cannabis horticulture, influencing both canopy architecture and flower development.

 

The practice encompasses both low-stress training (LST) and high-stress training (HST) methods. Low-stress training involves gentle manipulation of stems and branches without significant tissue damage. Techniques like bending branches and securing them in place encourage lateral growth, helping create an even canopy.³ This promotes more uniform light distribution across bud sites, potentially increasing total flower mass and resin production.⁴

High-stress training, by contrast, intentionally inflicts controlled damage to stimulate compensatory growth responses. Topping, one of the most common HST methods, involves cutting off the main shoot tip, causing the plant to redirect growth hormones (auxins) to side branches, promoting a bushier structure with multiple dominant colas.⁵ Another technique, supercropping, involves gently crushing internal stem tissue to weaken a branch, which is then bent over. The plant responds by thickening tissues at the damaged site, often improving structural strength and resin accumulation in adjacent flowers.⁶

Training methods also influence the plant’s apical dominance—the natural tendency of cannabis to prioritize growth in its central vertical stem. By redistributing hormonal signals through topping or bending, growers reduce vertical height and enhance lateral growth, creating more productive flowering surfaces in artificial lighting environments.⁵ ⁷

In indoor cultivation, plant training is often essential due to height restrictions and the limited penetration of artificial light sources. Techniques like the Screen of Green (ScrOG) system use a screen to spread branches horizontally, ensuring all bud sites receive adequate light and airflow.⁴ Outdoor growers may train plants to reduce visibility, avoid wind damage, or adapt to specific sun angles.⁸

While training can substantially improve yields and canopy management, it introduces risks. Excessive stress, poorly timed cuts, or repeated bending can stunt growth, increase susceptibility to pathogens, or provoke unwanted hermaphroditism in sensitive genotypes.⁵ ⁶ Timing is crucial: most training occurs during the vegetative phase, when plants have robust recovery capacity. Once flowering begins, severe interventions are generally avoided to minimize stress-induced yield losses.² ⁵

From a genetic perspective, not all cannabis varieties respond equally to training. Some cultivars, particularly those with strong 'sativa' traits, are highly vigorous and benefit from canopy management, while compact 'indica' dominant types may require less aggressive intervention.¹ ⁷ ⁸

 

Plant training remains both an art and a science in cannabis cultivation, demanding careful observation of plant responses and tailored approaches depending on cultivar, growing environment, and production goals. Done skillfully, it transforms a plant’s architecture into a structure optimized for both quantity and quality of harvest.

References:

  1. Small, E. (2015). Cannabis: A Complete Guide. CRC Press.

  2. Chandra, S. et al. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  3. Green, G. (2005). The Cannabis Grow Bible. Green Candy Press.

  4. Cervantes, J. (2006). Marijuana Horticulture: The Indoor/Outdoor Medical Grower’s Bible. Van Patten Publishing.

  5. McPartland, J. M. (2017). Cannabis botany and horticulture. In Pertwee, R. G. (Ed.), Handbook of Cannabis. Oxford University Press.

  6. Potter, D. J. (2009). The propagation, characterisation and optimisation of cannabis sativa L. as a phytopharmaceutical. PhD thesis, King’s College London.

  7. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  8. Rosenthal, E. (2010). Marijuana Grower’s Handbook. Quick American Publishing.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

A-gloved-hand-cuts-leaves-of-cannabis-growing-min-1-2048x1366-2317207721.jpg

Pruning

Definition: The targeted removal of plant parts, such as branches or leaves, to manipulate growth, improve morphology, or enhance yield.

Pruning is used to modify plant architecture, increase light penetration and air circulation, and direct metabolic resources toward floral structures. Experimental data from controlled environments indicate that moderate pruning (especially when paired with defoliation) can significantly affect shoot architecture and cannabinoid yield, though effects vary with genotype and intensity of intervention¹.

Pruning alters hormonal gradients within the plant, particularly the distribution of auxins and cytokinins, which regulate apical dominance and branching patterns². Topping (removal of the apical meristem) can induce lateral branching by reducing auxin flow from the main apex, while more aggressive pruning may delay flowering onset or reduce final yield if not properly timed³.

In landrace cultivation systems, pruning practices are often absent or minimal, with growers relying on the plant’s natural growth form and adapting cultivation practices to local ecological conditions. Ethnobotanical documentation of traditional cannabis agriculture rarely records pruning as a standard intervention, especially in extensive field systems⁴.

Scientific literature on pruning in Cannabis sativa remains limited and largely focused on modern high-input systems, with few controlled studies on landrace genotypes or open-field cultivation⁵.

References:

  1. Caplan, D., Stemeroff, J., Dixon, M., Zheng, Y. (2017). Vegetative propagation of cannabis by stem cuttings: effects of leaf number, cutting position, rooting hormone, and leaf tip removal. HortScience, 52(10), 1303–1310.

  2. Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I.M., Murphy, A. (2015). Plant Physiology and Development. Sinauer Associates.

  3. Punja, Z.K., et al. (2020). Pathogens and molds affecting production and quality of cannabis sativa L. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 112.

  4. Clarke, R.C., Merlin, M.D. (2016). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  5. Danziger, N., Bernstein, N. (2021). Plant architecture manipulation increases cannabinoid standardization in Cannabis sativa. Industrial Crops and Products, 162, 113274.

Related terms: [Topping] | [Training] | [Photoperiod] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by CRYSTALWEED cannabis

Defoliation

Definition: The deliberate removal of leaves from a plant to modify its growth, canopy structure, or microclimate.

Defoliation is a canopy management technique used to increase light penetration, reduce shading, and improve airflow within the plant structure. This practice is often employed during the vegetative or early flowering stages to expose lower bud sites and reduce the risk of microbial infections in dense canopies. Empirical data from controlled experiments show that moderate defoliation can increase floral yield in high-density Cannabis sativa canopies by redistributing assimilates and improving light interception¹.

However, defoliation also reduces the plant’s photosynthetic capacity and may induce stress responses, especially when applied excessively or late in the flowering cycle². Studies indicate that genotype, plant age, and environmental conditions significantly influence the plant’s ability to compensate for leaf removal³.

Defoliation is largely absent from traditional landrace cultivation systems, where plants are typically grown in open-field, low-density arrangements with minimal human intervention⁴. The practice is closely associated with intensive, high-input indoor or greenhouse systems that prioritize uniform morphology and dense floral output.

While widely used among commercial growers of modern hybrids, defoliation remains controversial. Some agronomists argue it can lead to decreased secondary metabolite production or compromise overall plant health if poorly timed or misapplied⁵.

References:

  1. Danziger, N., & Bernstein, N. (2021). Plant architecture manipulation increases cannabinoid standardization in Cannabis sativa. Industrial Crops and Products, 162, 113274.

  2. Caplan, D., Dixon, M., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Optimal rate of organic fertilizer during the flowering stage for medical cannabis grown in two coir-based substrates. HortScience, 52(12), 1796–1803.

  3. Cockson, P., et al. (2019). Investigating the impact of shoot pruning and defoliation on the growth and inflorescence yield of drug-type cannabis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 1333.

  4. Clarke, R.C., & Merlin, M.D. (2016). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  5. Westmoreland, F.M., et al. (2023). Effects of defoliation timing and severity on Cannabis sativa L. inflorescence yield and quality. Frontiers in Horticulture, 2, 1182629.

Related terms: [Pruning] | [Plant Training] | [Canopy Management] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Ryan Lange

Canopy management

Definition: The strategic control of a cannabis plant’s aboveground architecture to optimize light interception, airflow, and resource allocation.

Canopy management encompasses a range of techniques used to influence the spatial structure and density of cannabis foliage during vegetative and flowering growth phases. These include topping, pruning, defoliation, low-stress training (LST) and the use of support structures such as trellises or screens. In broadleaf drug-type landraces, especially those cultivated in montane or subtropical regions, canopy management is typically minimal or absent, with plants left to express their natural apical dominance. In contrast, intensive indoor or greenhouse systems often employ aggressive canopy control to standardize light distribution and reduce intracanopy humidity.

Effective canopy manipulation can enhance bud quality, increase harvestable biomass per square meter, and reduce the incidence of mold and pest infestations by promoting uniform airflow. However, over-intervention may induce stress responses, stunt growth, or alter secondary metabolite expression. Canopy management should be contextually adapted to plant morphology, environmental conditions, and cultivation goals.¹ ²

While the concept is widely applied in modern controlled environments, its relevance varies in traditional systems, where tall, sparsely branched landraces are often selected for minimal interference and maximum resilience under open-field conditions.³

Related terms: [Pruning] | [Plant Training] | [Canopy Management] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Ryan Lange

Culling

Definition: The targeted removal of individual plants based on observable traits or performance criteria.

Culling is a selective practice used throughout cannabis cultivation to eliminate plants that exhibit undesirable characteristics, such as poor vigor, structural weakness, late flowering, hermaphroditism, or susceptibility to pests and disease. In landrace cultivation, culling decisions may be based on a combination of phenotypic expression and ethnobotanical criteria shaped by local knowledge systems. Although often employed during the vegetative or early flowering stages, culling can also occur post-harvest based on resin quality, seed production, or other traits relevant to the intended use.

In traditional open-pollinated populations, culling functions as a form of negative selection that shapes the population over time, either intentionally or as a byproduct of farmer practice. Unlike roguing, which typically removes visibly off-type or diseased individuals to maintain population uniformity, culling may also be used to guide directional improvement or eliminate entire cohorts under resource constraints. The practice is context-dependent and varies across conservation, breeding, and commercial cultivation systems.

The threshold for culling and the traits prioritized often differ based on cultivation goals. In conservation-oriented grows, aggressive culling may risk narrowing the genepool, especially in small or bottlenecked populations. In contrast, high-intensity commercial grows may routinely cull more than 50% of seedlings to maintain production standards.

Related terms: [Pruning] | [Plant Training] | [Canopy Management] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Sonika Agarwal

Nutrients

Definition: In plant biology, nutrients are chemical elements required for growth, metabolism, and reproduction.

Cannabis requires a specific balance of essential nutrients to complete its life cycle. These elements are classified as macronutrients, needed in larger quantities and micronutrients, needed in trace amounts. Primary macronutrients include nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), which play critical roles in photosynthesis, energy transfer, and structural development. Secondary macronutrients (calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sulfur (S)) support functions such as cell wall formation, chlorophyll production, and enzymatic activity¹. Micronutrients such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), boron (B), molybdenum (Mo), and chlorine (Cl) serve as cofactors in biochemical processes².

 

Cannabis plants absorb nutrients primarily through their root systems in the form of ions dissolved in water. Nutrient availability is heavily influenced by soil pH, microbial activity, and cation exchange capacity. In traditional landrace cultivation systems, nutrient inputs are often managed through rotational cropping, composts, and the ecological dynamics of diverse polycultures rather than synthetic fertilizers³. Such approaches typically emphasize long-term soil fertility and resilience over short-term yield maximization.

Excess or deficiency of any essential nutrient can lead to physiological disorders or reduced vigor. For instance, nitrogen deficiency may cause chlorosis in older leaves, while excessive nitrogen can delay flowering and increase susceptibility to pests⁴. Importantly, nutrient uptake interacts with environmental variables such as light intensity, humidity, and temperature, requiring growers to consider nutrients within the broader agroecological context.

Terminological ambiguity may arise in cannabis cultivation where "nutrients" colloquially refers to commercial fertilizer products. In scientific usage, however, nutrients refer strictly to the elements themselves, not the formulations containing them.

References:

  1. Marschner, H. (2012). Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (3rd ed.). Academic Press.

  2. Epstein, E., & Bloom, A. J. (2005). Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives (2nd ed.). Sinauer Associates.

  3. Altieri, M. A. (1995). Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture. CRC Press.

  4. Cockson, P., et al. (2023). “The Role of Nutrient Management in Cannabis sativa Physiology and Yield.” Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1149647.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Macronutrient] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Gabriel Jimenez

Macronutrients

Definition: Essential mineral elements required by cannabis plants in large quantities for growth, development, and physiological function.

Macronutrients are the primary mineral nutrients that cannabis requires in relatively high concentrations to complete its life cycle. These include nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), often referred to collectively as NPK, as well as secondary macronutrients calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sulfur (S). Each plays distinct roles: nitrogen is central to amino acid and chlorophyll synthesis; phosphorus supports energy transfer via ATP and promotes root and flower development; potassium regulates stomatal function and enzyme activation¹.

 

Calcium stabilizes cell walls and membranes; magnesium is the core of the chlorophyll molecule and essential for photosynthesis; and sulfur is involved in synthesizing amino acids and coenzymes². Deficiencies or imbalances in these nutrients can lead to characteristic physiological symptoms (such as chlorosis, necrosis, or stunted growth) which vary depending on mobility and the plant’s developmental stage³.

 

Cannabis grown in traditional, low-input systems (such as landrace agriculture) often derives macronutrients from biologically active soils and organic amendments rather than synthetic fertilizers. This makes nutrient cycling and soil microbiota essential to fertility in such contexts⁴. Modern hydroponic or container cultivation requires precise macronutrient formulations tailored to growth stages (e.g., vegetative vs. flowering), but these systems often oversimplify the ecological complexity of nutrient uptake observed in situ⁵.

Although the NPK framework dominates commercial cultivation, there is growing recognition that ratios and interactions among macronutrients (and with micronutrients) can vary significantly between ecotypes, landraces, and growing environments.

References:

  1. Marschner, P. (2012). Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (3rd ed.). Academic Press.

  2. Mengel, K., & Kirkby, E. A. (2001). Principles of Plant Nutrition (5th ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  3. Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I. M., & Murphy, A. (2015). Plant Physiology and Development (6th ed.). Sinauer Associates.

  4. van der Heijden, M. G., Bardgett, R. D., & van Straalen, N. M. (2008). "The unseen majority: Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems." Ecology Letters, 11(3), 296–310.

  5. Cockson, P., et al. (2022). "Nutrient optimization strategies in Cannabis sativa L. cultivation: A review." Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 831233.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by James Baltz

Nitrogen

Definition: An essential macronutrient required for plant growth, nitrogen is a primary component of amino acids, nucleic acids, and chlorophyll.

Nitrogen (N) is fundamental to plant metabolism, playing a critical role in the synthesis of proteins, enzymes, and genetic material. In cannabis cultivation, nitrogen is especially important during the vegetative stage, where it supports rapid shoot and leaf development by promoting cell division and expansion. Deficiency symptoms typically include chlorosis (yellowing) of older leaves due to nitrogen's mobility within the plant, while excess nitrogen can lead to overly lush foliage, delayed flowering, and increased susceptibility to pests.

Plants absorb nitrogen primarily in the form of nitrate (NO₃⁻) and ammonium (NH₄⁺), with uptake mediated by root transporters and influenced by pH, microbial activity, and soil structure. Nitrogen availability is largely governed by the nitrogen cycle, in which organic matter is mineralized by soil microbes into plant-available forms. Traditional landrace systems often rely on this natural cycling, with fertility maintained through composting, animal manure, green manures, or intercropping with nitrogen-fixing legumes.

In outdoor, low-input cannabis systems, nitrogen management is closely tied to soil health, microbial communities, and rainfall patterns. Modern synthetic fertilizers offer rapid nitrogen delivery but can disrupt microbial ecology and leach into waterways if misapplied. Organic growers may use slow-release amendments like fish meal or fermented plant extracts, aligning nutrient availability with crop demand.

While nitrogen is universally recognized as a key input, debates persist around the optimal form (nitrate vs ammonium), timing, and source—especially in the context of sustainable, landrace-based cultivation practices¹ ².

References:

  1. Marschner, H. (2012). Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (3rd ed.). Academic Press.

  2. Taiz, L., et al. (2015). Plant Physiology and Development (6th ed.). Sinauer Associates.

  3. Jiao, Y., & Zhang, J. (2016). "Nitrogen use efficiency in crops: Lessons from Arabidopsis and rice." Journal of Experimental Botany, 67(12), 3539–3550.

  4. Smith, J. L., & Paul, E. A. (1990). "The significance of soil microbial biomass estimations." Soil Biochemistry, 6, 357–396.

  5. Zhang, X., et al. (2015). "Managing nitrogen for sustainable development." Nature, 528(7580), 51–59.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Kenneth Berrios Alvarez

Phosphorus

Definition: An essential macronutrient required for energy transfer, root development, and reproductive growth in cannabis.

Phosphorus (P) is a vital element for plant metabolism, primarily involved in the formation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), nucleic acids (DNA and RNA), and phospholipids in cell membranes¹. In cannabis cultivation, phosphorus plays a key role in early root development, floral induction, and seed formation². Deficiencies typically manifest as stunted growth, delayed flowering, and dark, purplish pigmentation in older leaves due to impaired energy transport and sugar metabolism³.

Phosphorus availability is highly dependent on soil pH, with optimal uptake occurring in the range of 6.0 to 7.0⁴. In acidic or alkaline soils, phosphorus readily binds to aluminum, iron, or calcium compounds, forming insoluble complexes that reduce bioavailability⁵. In traditional landrace cultivation systems—especially those relying on organic inputs or marginal soils—phosphorus limitations may constrain plant productivity and cannabinoid expression unless amended with composted manures, wood ash, or phosphate rock.

While widely regarded as essential, excessive phosphorus fertilization in industrial systems contributes to ecological degradation, notably through eutrophication of surface waters⁶. Sustainable cannabis cultivation practices aim to optimize phosphorus efficiency through soil testing, microbial inoculants, and integrated organic amendments rather than high-input, water-soluble fertilizers.

References:

  1. Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I. M., & Murphy, A. (2015). Plant Physiology and Development (6th ed.). Sinauer Associates.

  2. Chandra, S., Lata, H., & ElSohly, M. A. (2017). Cannabis sativa L.: Botany and Biotechnology. Springer.

  3. Cockson, P., Albornoz, F., & Marschner, P. (2020). “Nutrient deficiency symptoms and uptake patterns in Cannabis sativa L.” Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 183(6), 727–738.

  4. Marschner, H. (2012). Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (3rd ed.). Academic Press.

  5. Hinsinger, P. (2001). “Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review.” Plant and Soil, 237(2), 173–195.

  6. Cordell, D., Drangert, J.-O., & White, S. (2009). “The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought.” Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 292–305.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Jametlene Reskp

Potassium

Definition: An essential macronutrient that regulates osmotic balance, enzyme activation, and stress responses in cannabis plants.

Potassium (K) plays a central role in maintaining turgor pressure, regulating stomatal opening, and activating over 60 enzymatic processes critical to carbohydrate metabolism, protein synthesis, and photosynthesis. Unlike nitrogen or phosphorus, potassium is not a structural component of biomolecules but remains in ionic form (K⁺) within plant tissues, facilitating water uptake, nutrient transport, and internal pH balance¹.

In cannabis, potassium is especially important during the flowering phase, where it supports translocation of photosynthates and increases resistance to abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity². Deficiencies manifest as chlorosis and necrosis on leaf margins, reduced internodal spacing, and brittle stems, while excess potassium can antagonize the uptake of magnesium and calcium, leading to secondary deficiencies³.

 

Potassium is highly mobile in plants and moderately mobile in soils, with availability influenced by soil texture, cation exchange capacity, and moisture levels. In traditional dryland farming systems where irrigation and fertilization are minimal, potassium dynamics may be shaped by fallow periods, composting practices, or ash amendments. Landrace cannabis populations often display notable tolerance to low-potassium soils, a result of local adaptation rather than reduced physiological demand⁴.

There is ongoing debate over the optimal potassium-to-nitrogen ratio during flowering, with some cultivators advocating for high K:N ratios to promote floral development, though empirical evidence specific to Cannabis sativa remains limited⁵.

References:

  1. Marschner, H. (2012). Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (3rd ed.). Academic Press.

  2. Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I. M., & Murphy, A. (2015). Plant Physiology and Development (6th ed.). Sinauer Associates.

  3. Epstein, E., & Bloom, A. J. (2005). Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives (2nd ed.). Sinauer Associates.

  4. Lentz, D. L., & Ramirez-Sosa, C. R. (2002). Cultivating resilience: Landrace adaptation to edaphic stress. Economic Botany, 56(2), 149–163.

  5. Caplan, D., et al. (2017). Optimal rate of potassium for Cannabis sativa L. during flowering. HortScience, 52(12), 1793–1799.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Alexandre Debiève

Micronutrients

Definition: An essential plant nutrient required in very small quantities for normal growth, development, and physiological functioning.

Micronutrients are mineral elements absorbed primarily through the root system and utilized in trace amounts, typically measured in parts per million (ppm). Despite their low required concentrations, deficiencies can result in severe physiological disruptions, including impaired enzyme activity, chlorosis, necrosis, and stunted growth. The primary plant micronutrients include iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), boron (B), molybdenum (Mo), chlorine (Cl), and nickel (Ni)¹.

Each micronutrient plays a distinct biochemical role. For instance, iron is critical for chlorophyll synthesis and electron transport in photosynthesis, while boron is essential for cell wall integrity and reproductive development². These elements often serve as enzyme cofactors or structural components of key proteins and metabolic pathways³.

In landrace cannabis cultivation, micronutrient availability is shaped by soil type, pH, organic matter content, and microbial activity. Mountain soils may be deficient in boron or molybdenum, while acidic forest soils can lead to toxicities of manganese or iron due to increased solubility. Management practices that overemphasize macronutrient fertilization without regard for micronutrient balance may inadvertently induce deficiencies through antagonistic interactions⁴.

Micronutrient requirements are generally species-specific and context-dependent, with local ecotypes often adapted to particular soil chemistries. In traditional agroecosystems, sustained productivity is often maintained without synthetic supplementation due to closed nutrient cycles and biologically mediated availability from organic inputs⁵.

References:

  1. Marschner, H. (2012). Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (3rd ed.). Academic Press.

  2. Broadley, M. R., et al. (2012). "Functions of mineral micronutrients in plants." In: Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press.

  3. Kabata-Pendias, A. (2010). Trace Elements in Soils and Plants (4th ed.). CRC Press.

  4. Fageria, N. K., et al. (2002). "Micronutrients in crop production." Advances in Agronomy, 77, 185–268.

  5. Altieri, M. A. (1995). Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture. Westview Press.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Markus Spiske

Watering Practices

Definition: The set of techniques used to manage water availability to cannabis plants throughout their life cycle.

Effective watering practices balance moisture availability with soil aeration to optimize plant health, nutrient uptake, and root development. Cannabis exhibits sensitivity to both drought and oversaturation, particularly during seedling establishment and flowering. Overwatering reduces oxygen diffusion to roots, promoting anaerobic conditions that can lead to pathogen proliferation, including Pythium spp. and Fusarium spp.¹ Underwatering, by contrast, induces stomatal closure, halts photosynthesis, and may trigger early flowering or flower abortion—especially in sensitive landrace populations poorly adapted to arid conditions.

Watering requirements depend on factors such as soil composition, container size, plant age, vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and phenology. Loamy soils with good structure retain moisture while allowing gas exchange, whereas clay-heavy soils are prone to compaction and waterlogging. In traditional open-field cultivation of landrace cannabis, especially in regions like the Hindu Kush or Northeast India, watering is often minimal or seasonally timed with monsoon onset, with deep taproots exploiting subsoil moisture.²

Modern irrigation techniques include surface watering, drip irrigation, and subirrigation. Drip systems are favored in controlled cultivation for their precision and water-use efficiency, especially when paired with fertigation.³ In rainfed systems, mulching and soil shading are key traditional strategies used to conserve moisture and buffer against diurnal temperature swings. Soil moisture sensors and gravimetric measurements can aid precision, though most smallholder growers rely on tactile cues and plant behavior.

There is ongoing debate over the value of water stress in enhancing secondary metabolite production. While mild drought has been linked to increased resin gland density and terpene concentration in some chemotypes,⁴ such effects are highly genotype and environment dependent, severe stress generally reduces total yield and cannabinoid content.⁵

References:

  1. Caplan, D., Dixon, M., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Optimal rate of organic fertilizer during the flowering stage for cannabis grown in two coir-based substrates. HortScience, 52(12), 1796–1803.

  2. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2016). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  3. Saloner, A., & Bernstein, N. (2022). Response of medical cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) to fertigation with nitrogen at different concentrations and forms. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 945238.

  4. Bernstein, N., Gorelick, J., & Koch, S. (2019). Interplay between chemistry and morphology in medical cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.). Industrial Crops and Products, 129, 185–194.

  5. Hawley, G., et al. (2018). Physiological stress in Cannabis sativa: Effects on growth, development, and cannabinoid accumulation. Plant Physiology Reports, 23(4), 457–465.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Alexandre Debiève

PH 

Definition: Measure of hydrogen ion concentration that determines the acidity or alkalinity of a substance, expressed on a scale from 0 (acidic) to 14 (alkaline), with 7 as neutral.

In cannabis cultivation, pH affects nutrient solubility, microbial activity, and overall plant health. Soil-grown cannabis typically thrives in a slightly acidic root-zone pH of 6.0 to 6.8, while hydroponic systems perform best between 5.5 and 6.5. Deviations outside these ranges can cause nutrient lockout, even when fertilizers are present in sufficient quantities. For example, phosphorus and calcium availability drop sharply below pH 5.5, while iron and manganese become overly soluble and potentially toxic above pH 7.5.

Native soils vary widely in pH depending on parent material, rainfall, and organic content. Tropical soils often exhibit low pH due to leaching, while calcareous or arid soils trend alkaline. Traditional landrace cultivation practices, including composting, ash application, and rotational cropping, often help buffer soil pH without chemical amendments.

While pH meters and test kits are standard in commercial agriculture, traditional farmers assess soil acidity indirectly through crop response or texture and smell of the soil. These indigenous practices reflect practical knowledge systems that remain effective in context, though they may lack quantitative precision.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Abhishek Pawar

Soil

Definition: The biologically active upper layer of the Earth’s crust in which plants anchor and grow, composed of mineral particles, organic matter, air, and water.

Soil functions as the primary medium for cannabis cultivation, providing mechanical support, regulating water and nutrient availability, and housing diverse microbial communities essential to plant health. Its composition—typically a mixture of sand, silt, clay, and decomposed organic matter—directly influences aeration, drainage, cation exchange capacity, and microbial activity. For landrace cannabis, which has adapted to diverse agroecological zones, soil properties play a central role in local phenotypic expression and chemotypic development.

Soils are commonly classified by texture (e.g., loamy, sandy, clayey), structure (aggregate arrangement), and pH. Each of these factors affects root growth, nutrient solubility, and microbial symbiosis. For example, many landrace populations thrive in marginal or low-fertility soils where slow-release nutrient cycling from organic matter or mineral weathering dominates over synthetic amendments¹. In such systems, plants may exhibit traits selected under nutrient stress or drought, such as deep root systems or efficient phosphorus uptake.

Soil fertility in traditional cannabis-growing regions is often maintained through practices like fallowing, composting, ash application, or polyculture systems, which sustain microbial diversity and long-term productivity². These practices contrast sharply with high-input, inert media used in commercial cultivation and ignoring such differences can result in misinterpretation of a landrace's performance under field versus artificial conditions.

Contested definitions occasionally arise around the term "living soil," which informally denotes soil managed to preserve microbial networks, mycorrhizal associations, and nutrient cycling capacity without synthetic inputs³. While not a scientific classification, it reflects a growing emphasis on soil as a biological system rather than an inert substrate⁴.

Cannabis exhibits notable plasticity across soil types, but adaptation is rarely neutral: local soil conditions exert directional selection on genotypic frequencies over time, shaping distinct ecotypes even within contiguous regions⁵. Understanding these dynamics is critical when evaluating landrace populations across geographic or ecological gradients.

References:

  1. Caplan, D., Dixon, M., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Optimal rate of organic fertilizer during the flowering stage for cannabis grown in two coir-based substrates. HortScience, 52(12), 1796–1803.

  2. Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2016). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  3. Saloner, A., & Bernstein, N. (2022). Response of medical cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) to fertigation with nitrogen at different concentrations and forms. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 945238.

  4. Bernstein, N., Gorelick, J., & Koch, S. (2019). Interplay between chemistry and morphology in medical cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.). Industrial Crops and Products, 129, 185–194.

  5. Hawley, G., et al. (2018). Physiological stress in Cannabis sativa: Effects on growth, development, and cannabinoid accumulation. Plant Physiology Reports, 23(4), 457–465.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Abhishek Pawar

Living Soil

Definition: Soil characterized by high biological activity and a self-regenerating web of microbial, fungal, and faunal life that supports nutrient cycling, plant health, and ecological balance.

Living soil functions as a dynamic, biologically integrated system in which microbial communities decompose organic matter, fix atmospheric nitrogen, solubilize minerals, and form symbiotic relationships with plant roots. This biologically mediated nutrient availability contrasts with the extractive nature of sterile or synthetically fertilized substrates, which often bypass microbial mediation entirely. In cannabis cultivation, living soil systems (when properly managed) can enhance terpene expression, improve resistance to abiotic stress and reduce susceptibility to pests, pathogens by fostering resilient plant-microbe interactions.

Key components of living soil include mycorrhizal fungi, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g. Rhizobium and Azospirillum), decomposers such as actinomycetes and saprophytic fungi, and macrofauna such as earthworms and arthropods. These organisms interact through nutrient exchange networks and produce metabolites that alter root architecture and plant secondary metabolite profiles. Fungal-to-bacterial ratios, aggregate structure, and organic matter content are often used as indicators of soil health and functionality.

Practices such as composting, mulching, polyculture planting, and minimal tillage promote living soil ecology, especially when implemented in situ within native agroecosystems. In landrace contexts, traditional management systems frequently preserve or enhance soil biology without synthetic inputs, relying instead on long-standing ecological feedbacks. However, the term “living soil” is also used in commercial contexts to describe pre-mixed substrates that imitate natural systems but may differ significantly in structure or microbial diversity.

The definition of living soil remains somewhat fluid, with interpretations ranging from loose marketing usage to rigorous ecological modeling of soil food webs. Despite this variability, most scientific definitions emphasize functional redundancy, trophic complexity and sustained nutrient cycling as core attributes.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Abhishek Pawar

Native Soils

Definition: The naturally occurring soil in a specific geographic location, shaped by the region’s parent material, climate, biota, and topography.

Native soils form the foundational substrate in which landrace cannabis populations have co-evolved with their environment. These soils are not uniform but reflect local pedogenesis, incorporating organic matter from endemic vegetation, mineral content from underlying rock, and centuries of human and animal interaction. For cannabis, native soil characteristics( (such as pH, texture, cation exchange capacity (CEC) and microbial community composition) directly influence growth patterns, nutrient uptake, and chemical expression.

 

This soil–plant relationship is integral to the long-term resilience of in situ populations and may be disrupted when landraces are transplanted to artificial or non-native growing media.

Native soils in traditional cultivation zones may be high in organic content due to continuous low-till practices, or nutrient poor in areas subject to erosion or shifting cultivation, requiring local knowledge to amend or supplement effectively. The microbial and fungal networks native to these soils also play a significant role in nutrient cycling and plant immunity.

The definition of "native soil" may vary across agronomic and conservation contexts. Some restrict the term to pre-agricultural or undisturbed soils, while others extend it to include anthropogenically enriched but long-cultivated soils that form a stable ecological interface with landrace crops.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Organic cultivation

Definition: An ecological farming system that sustains crop production by relying on biological processes, excluding synthetic inputs.

In cannabis agriculture, organic cultivation refers to the use of natural fertilizers, pest management techniques, and soil amendments to maintain plant health and productivity without synthetic agrochemicals. Inputs typically include compost, manure, botanical ferments, rock powders, and biological pest control agents. The emphasis is on fostering soil biological activity, nutrient cycling, and ecological resilience through low-input or regenerative practices.

Many traditional landrace cultivation systems operate without synthetic inputs and share functional characteristics with organic farming, though they are rarely certified or formally documented. In regions such as the Indian Himalayas, cannabis is grown in rotational plots enriched with animal manure, ash, and decomposing plant matter. While these methods have not been systematically studied in cannabis-specific agronomic research, they are consistent with ecological farming systems described in broader agroecological literature¹.

As of now, there is no peer-reviewed research evaluating the effects of certified organic field cultivation on cannabinoid or terpene profiles in Cannabis sativa. Most existing studies focus on indoor or greenhouse-grown plants in soilless media, often under controlled nutrient regimens that do not reflect traditional organic methods. Claims linking organic practices to improved resin content or aromatic expression remain anecdotal.

Certification systems vary across jurisdictions. For example, USDA Organic standards prohibit synthetic fertilizers and pesticides but also ban hydroponic cannabis production². Other schemes may allow soilless systems under “organic” labels, leading to inconsistencies in how organic cannabis is defined and marketed globally.

References:

  1. Altieri, M. A., Nicholls, C. I., Henao, A., & Lana, M. A. (2015). Agroecology and the design of climate-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(3), 869–890

  2. USDA. (2023). National Organic Program Handbook. United States Department of Agriculture.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Landrace CUltivation

Definition: The traditional agricultural regime by which landrace crop populations are maintained, selected and propagated within their indigenous ecological and cultural contexts.

Landrace cultivation refers to on‑farm seed saving, selection and cultivation practices embedded in traditional farming systems across specific ecogeographic regions. These practices maintain genetically heterogeneous, locally adapted crop populations over generations¹²³. Farmers save seeds from multiple plants, selecting for traits such as environmental resilience, yield stability, nutritional quality, or cultural use, while avoiding homogenization through excessive uniformity².

Traditional cultivation systems typically involve minimal external inputs, reliance on local rainfall or low‐input organic soil management, and rotation or intercropping with staple crops to enhance biodiversity and resilience³⁴. This approach enables crops to adapt dynamically to local environmental stresses (such as drought, pests, or poor soils) without formal breeding interventions³.

Definitions accepted in peer-reviewed research emphasize that landrace cultivation operates in situ, that is, within the local landscape and via farmer‑driven reproductive selection with populations characterized by high genetic diversity, historical origin, recognizable identity and absence of formal breeding²⁵. These elements distinguish landrace cultivation from commercial cultivar propagation or formal breeding programmes.

The scientific consensus acknowledges that cultivation systems vary regionally and that some landrace populations may exhibit exceptions depending on crop reproduction mode or local seed management practices². Regulatory contexts, such as EU conservation‑variety registration, often conflict with the inherent heterogeneity of landraces, placing pressure on traditional cultivation frameworks³.

Landrace cultivation has important agricultural and conservation relevance. It sustains agrobiodiversity, supports yield stability under marginal conditions, and preserves cultural and nutritional traits that are absent in uniform modern varieties³⁴⁵. However, modern agriculture, seed legislation, and cultivar replacement threaten these systems, putting associated genetic resources and indigenous knowledge at risk³⁵.

References:

  1. Camacho‑Villa, T. C., Maxted, N., Scholten, M., & Ford‑Lloyd, B. (2005). Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 3(3), 373–384.

  2. Frankel, O. H., Brown, A. H. D., & Burdon, J. J. (1995). The Conservation of Plant Biodiversity. Cambridge University Press.

  3. Persson, A. et al. (2024). Saving, sharing and shaping landrace seeds in commons. Agriculture and Human Values.

  4. Camacho‑Villa, T. C., et al. (2005). Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 3(3), 373–384.

  5. Camacho‑Villa, T. C., Maxted, N., Scholten, M., & Ford‑Lloyd, B. (2005). Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 3(3), 373–384.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

Image by Martin Oslic

Integrated Pest Management

Definition: An ecologically based pest management strategy that integrates multiple control methods to minimize pest damage while reducing reliance on chemical interventions.

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) employs a coordinated set of practices (cultural, biological, mechanical, and chemical) to suppress pest populations below economically damaging thresholds. It emphasizes prevention and ecosystem resilience, favoring long-term solutions over reactive treatments. In cannabis cultivation, IPM approaches include maintaining biodiversity to encourage natural predators, adjusting irrigation to deter fungal outbreaks, using pest-resistant varieties, and applying targeted biologicals or low-toxicity pesticides only as a last resort.

IPM is context-dependent and must be adapted to specific agroecological conditions. In traditional landrace systems, many IPM principles are embedded in local farming knowledge, such as intercropping, varietal rotation, or harvesting cycles that interrupt pest lifecycles. However, these methods may not be formally recognized within IPM literature, which has historically been biased toward industrial monoculture settings¹.

Chemical inputs in IPM are used judiciously and only when monitoring data indicates that pest populations exceed established action thresholds. This distinguishes IPM from conventional pesticide regimes and aligns it more closely with agroecological and organic principles². Nevertheless, definitions of IPM vary across institutions and can blur in commercial practice, especially when prophylactic pesticide use is marketed as "integrated"³.

Successful IPM implementation relies on accurate pest identification, continuous monitoring, and an understanding of ecological interactions. For smallholder or landrace-oriented growers, integrating indigenous knowledge with scientifically grounded pest management strategies may improve both crop health and cultural resilience⁴.

References:

  1. Camacho‑Villa, T. C., Maxted, N., Scholten, M., & Ford‑Lloyd, B. (2005). Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 3(3), 373–384.

  2. Frankel, O. H., Brown, A. H. D., & Burdon, J. J. (1995). The Conservation of Plant Biodiversity. Cambridge University Press.

  3. Persson, A. et al. (2024). Saving, sharing and shaping landrace seeds in commons. Agriculture and Human Values.

  4. Camacho‑Villa, T. C., et al. (2005). Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 3(3), 373–384.

  5. Camacho‑Villa, T. C., Maxted, N., Scholten, M., & Ford‑Lloyd, B. (2005). Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 3(3), 373–384.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049600.jpg

Processing

Processing determines the final chemical profile, stability, and sensory qualities of cannabis. For landrace cultivators, processing is inseparable from ecology and tradition. Local techniques (whether air-drying in bamboo shacks, compression curing using bamboo, or rubbing fresh plants into charas) encode environmental adaptation, cultural logic, and economic function.

This section defines key terms used across traditional and modern cannabis processing systems, with a focus on methods relevant to the conservation, analysis, and use of landrace cultivars.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Harvest

Definition: The act of gathering mature crop plants or plant products from the field at the appropriate time.

The act of removing female cannabis inflorescences from the plant, typically at a culturally, agronomically, or chemically determined stage of maturity.

Cannabis harvest involves cutting or plucking mature female inflorescences, with timing based on a range of factors including chemical profile, seed development, weather conditions, and local practice¹. In industrial contexts, harvest is often calibrated to maximize specific cannabinoids (e.g. THC, CBD) or terpenes, using trichome and pistil color as proxies for resin gland maturity². However, in traditional or subsistence contexts, harvest may prioritize seed viability, mold avoidance, cultural calendar, or labor availability³.

Chemically optimized harvest generally occurs when glandular trichomes are mostly cloudy with some amber coloration, indicating peak levels of unoxidized cannabinoids⁴. Pistil color (typically 60–80% red or brown) also provides a coarse indicator of floral maturation⁴. However, this model is genotype-dependent and does not reflect all harvest goals. For example, in hashish-producing regions, early harvest may be favored for a more uplifting resin effect, while late harvest is preferred for sedative qualities⁵. In rain-prone areas, harvest may be accelerated to avoid rot, even at the cost of incomplete ripening⁶.

There is no single “optimal” harvest time across contexts. In landrace cultivation, harvest timing is embedded in broader agroecological rhythms and often co-determined by weather, pest pressure, seed maturity, and inherited local knowledge. As such, scientific models that correlate chemical peaks with visual maturity indicators offer useful data but cannot substitute for context-specific decision-making³.

References:

  1. Clarke, R.C. & Merlin, M.D. (2016). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.

  2. De Backer, B. et al. (2012). Evolution of the content of THC and other major cannabinoids in cannabis samples. Journal of Forensic Sciences 57(4):918–922.

  3. Russo, E.B. (2007). History of cannabis and its preparations in saga, science, and sobriquet. Chemistry & Biodiversity 4(8):1614–1648.

  4. Tran, J. et al. (2025). Determination of Optimal Harvest Time in Cannabis sativa L. Based upon Stigma Color Transition. Plants 14(10):1532.

  5. Potter, D.J. (2009). The propagation, characterization and optimization of cannabis sativa L. as a phytopharmaceutical. PhD thesis, King's College London.

  6. Small, E. & Naraine, S.G.U. (2016). Size matters: evolution of large drug-secreting resin glands in elite pharmaceutical strains of Cannabis sativa L. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 63:349–359.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Trimming

Definition: The post-harvest removal of foliage from cannabis inflorescences to facilitate drying, reduce microbial risk, and improve final product quality.

Trimming is a processing step in which excess vegetative material (primarily fan leaves and sugar leaves) is removed from harvested cannabis flowers. This practice improves airflow during drying, minimizes moisture retention, and reduces the surface area available for microbial growth, especially in dense-flowered cultivars. Trimming also increases resin accessibility in preparations such as dry sift and hand-rubbed charas, though in some traditional contexts, untrimmed material is retained to preserve trichomes until later stages.

Wet trimming is performed immediately after harvest while the plant remains turgid. It is often preferred in humid climates to accelerate moisture loss and reduce mold risk. Dry trimming is conducted after partial or full drying and is commonly used in low-humidity environments or when the preservation of volatile terpenes and trichome integrity is prioritized. Both methods are employed globally, though minimal trimming is typical in landrace contexts where resin, not manicured appearance, is the primary goal.

Machine trimming has become widespread in industrial settings but is often avoided by artisanal producers due to trichome damage. The method, extent and timing of trimming vary according to the individual doing the trimming, environmental conditions, cultivar morphology and end use.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Manicuring

Definition: The removal of extraneous leaf material from cannabis inflorescences after harvest and prior to curing.

Manicuring is a post-harvest processing step in which excess leaf matter (typically sugar leaves and any remaining fan leaves) is trimmed from the floral clusters to improve drying efficiency, reduce harshness during combustion, and enhance market presentation. This step follows trimming, often performed while the flowers are still wet (wet trimming) or after initial drying (dry trimming), and precedes curing.

In traditional contexts, particularly among landrace cultivators, manicuring is often minimal or omitted altogether, especially when the cannabis is destined for resin extraction or local consumption. For example, in charas-producing regions of the Western Himalayas, plants are generally processed fresh, with only coarse fan leaf removal. Conversely, in commercialized or export-oriented settings, manicuring is more intensive, aiming to reduce chlorophyll-rich leaf content and refine visual uniformity.

The extent of manicuring is influenced by intended use (e.g., smoking, extraction), resource availability (e.g., labor), and cultural preferences. While heavy manicuring may increase visual appeal and perceived value in regulated markets, it can also lead to the loss of trichome-rich material and may not be favored by traditional cultivators focused on resin yield.

No formal standard defines the boundary between trimming and manicuring, and the terms are often used interchangeably in colloquial usage. However, in technical contexts, manicuring typically refers to fine-detail hand removal after the initial structural trim.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Drying

Definition: The post-harvest process of reducing moisture content in cannabis inflorescences to preserve chemical integrity and prevent microbial spoilage.

Drying is the initial stage of cannabis processing following harvest, during which moisture content is reduced from approximately 70–80% to 10–15% in preparation for curing or storage. This reduction halts enzymatic activity, slows terpene volatilization and suppresses microbial growth. The speed and environmental conditions of drying strongly influence the final chemical profile and stability of the product.

Optimal drying conditions include shaded, well-ventilated spaces maintained between 15–21°C with relative humidity between 50–60%. Rapid drying under heat or sunlight can cause terpene loss and discoloration, while insufficient airflow in humid conditions encourages mold. Traditional landrace growers adapt local materials—such as thatch-roofed lofts or elevated platforms—to create passive airflow and protect drying material from rain.

Drying methods vary: whole plants may be hung upside down, branches suspended, or flowers laid on mesh racks. Material intended for sieving or hand-rubbed resin is typically dried more thoroughly than flower for combustion, which benefits from slight pliability at the end of drying.

“Dry” is context-dependent. Smoking-grade flower retains more internal moisture than material destined for mechanical processing or long-term storage.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Curing

Definition: The slow post-drying process that conditions cannabis through controlled humidity, allowing continued biochemical transformation and moisture redistribution.

Curing begins after drying, typically when flower moisture content reaches 10–15%. During curing, cannabis is stored in sealed or semi-sealed containers under cool, stable conditions, usually between 55–65% relative humidity and 15–20°C. This environment facilitates the redistribution of internal moisture and enables enzymatic processes that degrade residual chlorophyll and other undesirable volatiles, while preserving or enhancing terpene retention and cannabinoid stability.

Proper curing improves aroma, smoothness, and shelf life by reducing harsh compounds like sugars, acids, and ammonia formed during senescence². The process may last from one to eight weeks depending on cultivar, container volume, ambient conditions, and intended market. Over-curing or curing in poorly aerated environments can encourage microbial growth, including Aspergillus species and Botrytis cinerea, particularly in inadequately dried material.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

AGING

Definition: The controlled post-curing storage of dried cannabis inflorescences or hashish to stabilize or enhance chemical composition, aroma, and sensory properties over time.

 

Aging refers to the intentional storage of cannabis material (typically dried and cured inflorescences or hashish) for extended periods under stable environmental conditions. The process allows further biochemical changes to occur, including the slow degradation of certain cannabinoids (e.g., THCA to CBNA), the oxidation of terpenes and the reduction of residual chlorophyll and volatile sulfur compounds. These transformations can influence the aroma, flavor, and subjective effects of the material.

 

In traditional contexts, especially in regions cultivating landrace varieties, aging is often practiced for months or even years, typically in sealed clay vessels, glass jars, or fabric-lined wooden boxes stored in cool, dark environments. Anecdotal reports from Nepal, Northern India, and Southeast Asia describe aged cannabis as smoother in taste and more sedative in effect, likely due to increased concentrations of oxidized terpenes and cannabinoid degradation products.

 

Scientific literature on cannabis aging remains limited, but parallels may be drawn with post-fermentation aging of tea, tobacco, or cured meats, where prolonged storage leads to complex chemical stabilization. However, uncontrolled aging (particularly in humid or high-oxygen environments) can result in microbial spoilage, terpene loss, or cannabinoid degradation beyond desirable thresholds.

 

There is no universally accepted endpoint or optimal duration for aging; its practice varies widely across cultures and consumer preferences. Some traditional systems treat aging as integral to achieving the desired pharmacological and organoleptic character of the material, while commercial markets often prioritize freshness and potency.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Storage

Definition: The maintenance of dried cannabis inflorescences, resin, or seeds under controlled conditions to preserve chemical composition, viability, or physical integrity, or to facilitate transport and trade.

Cannabis storage methods are determined by the material being preserved (flower, resin, or seed), the intended use (consumption, planting, or trade) and the environmental and technological context in which storage occurs. Improper storage accelerates degradation of cannabinoids, terpenes and seed viability, while some forms of storage (particularly for transport) deliberately prioritize concealment and compressibility over preservation.

For dried inflorescences, the primary objective is to reduce degradation caused by light, oxygen, temperature fluctuation, and relative humidity. Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) decarboxylates into Δ⁹-THC with heat and time, while Δ⁹-THC oxidizes into cannabinol (CBN), a less psychoactive compound¹. Terpenes, being volatile and sensitive to heat and oxygen, are rapidly lost or transformed. Best practices for storage of dried flower—whether in scientific, industrial, or artisanal contexts—involve sealed, opaque containers in cool, dry, and stable environments (ideally around 15–20°C and 55–62% RH). Vacuum sealing or nitrogen flushing may be employed to slow oxidative degradation, but such techniques are rarely available to smallholder cultivators.

In landrace-growing regions, storage methods are often improvised from local materials and adapted to climatic constraints. In Thailand, dried cannabis is sometimes wrapped in corn husks, banana leaves, or newspaper before being bundled with string or fiber. During the 20th-century export boom, cannabis was tightly bound around stems with fiber to produce compact, visually uniform units (later termed “Thai sticks” in the U.S.) though these were not necessarily intended for long-term storage. In many rural contexts, dry cannabis is stored in cloth sacks, plastic bags, or reused tins. These containers may protect from light and pests but often lack environmental sealing, exposing contents to high humidity and temperature swings that degrade potency and aroma.

 

Hashish, especially dry-sieved resin from Morocco or Central Asia, is comparatively stable, but its storage also affects quality. Resin is typically pressed into slabs or “soap bar” blocks to facilitate storage and transport. Hand-rubbed charas may be stored in parchment, cloth, or plastic, depending on intended duration. In Morocco, slabs are commonly wrapped in cellophane or plastic wrap and stacked in bundles, while in India, charas is often rolled into finger-sized pieces or flat 'chapati' like pancakes and kept in baggies or reused containers. Long-term resin storage under ambient conditions leads to darkening, terpene loss, and changes in consistency due to oxidation and polymerization of cannabinoids.

Smuggling-oriented storage, particularly during the global cannabis export era of the 1960s–1990s, prioritized density and concealability. Cannabis was hydraulically or manually compressed into bricks, sometimes with additives or binders. These bricks, common across Latin America and parts of Asia, exhibit significant trichome rupture, oxidation, and microbial degradation, especially when compressed while partially moist. This form of storage often (but not always) results in markedly reduced aromatic and psychoactive quality depending on the technique and materials employed. 

 

Cannabis seeds exhibit orthodox storage behaviour, meaning they can survive desiccation and benefit from cold storage. Standard genebank protocol involves drying seeds to 5–8% moisture content and storing them at –18°C to preserve viability. In smallholder systems, seeds are commonly stored in paper, plastic, or cloth, often in elevated or shaded areas to limit heat exposure. Viability under ambient conditions degrades rapidly, particularly in humid tropical climates, with germination rates declining significantly after one or two seasons.

Effective storage practices in landrace regions are shaped more by environmental constraints and material accessibility than by formal preservation science. As such, storage in these contexts is often a balancing act between maintaining product quality, minimising pest or fungal contamination and preparing for sale or use in the near term.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Thai sticks

Definition: Traditional cannabis preparations from Thailand consisting of whole buds bound to a bamboo stick using natural fiber.

 

Thai sticks are a handcrafted preparation method developed in Thailand in which cured cannabis buds, typically from local landrace populations, are carefully aligned and tightly bound to a thin bamboo skewer using string or hemp fiber. The stick served as a temporary scaffold, with the binding shaping the buds into a firm, cylindrical form. After drying, the stick was sometimes removed before sale or consumption.

This method was widely practiced during the mid-20th century, particularly in the Lao speaking region of Isan in northeastern Thailand, where cannabis was cultivated for both local use and export. Thai sticks gained international attention during the Vietnam War era, when U.S. soldiers encountered them through regional markets. They were valued for their portability, long shelf life, and slow, even burn.

Despite reinterpretations abroad, authentic Thai sticks were never wrapped in cannabis leaf or coated in resin/oil/opium. 

 

Modern usage of the term often reflects concentrate-infused novelty products that bear little resemblance to the original Thai preparation. In ethnobotanical and historical contexts, the term should be reserved for preparations made with traditional methods and regional landrace material.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Buddha Sticks

Definition: Large cannabis bundles tied to a stick, developed in the 1980s as a lower-grade, high-volume alternative to traditional Thai sticks.

Buddha sticks are a form of bundled cannabis in which whole or semi-trimmed colas are tied around a central stalk and cured together. The method became widespread in the 1980s as Thai stick production declined due to increased aerial surveillance and interdiction, especially around Udon Thani. As the growing zones in Isan came under pressure, many cultivators relocated across the Mekong into Laos, where family and ethnic ties allowed production to continue with fewer risks.

Unlike Thai sticks, which were often carefully trimmed and manicured, originally made as a product for domestic consumption, buddha sticks were larger, rougher and geared toward mass export. They were typically bundled with plastic twine or natural fiber, then bagged for transportation. This in-bundle curing produced a dense, compact form that was easier to conceal and transport.

The term is often confused with Thai stick, but refers to a distinct format associated with the later, more commercialized phase of the Southeast Asian cannabis trade.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Compression Curing

Definition: The process of curing cannabis under sustained pressure to influence chemical composition, density, and aging dynamics.

Compression curing encompasses a range of post-harvest techniques in which cannabis (either in raw inflorescence or processed forms such as hashish) is subjected to mechanical pressure for extended periods. This pressure can be applied manually (e.g., wrapping and binding), mechanically (e.g., hydraulic pressing), or through weighted storage. The method is employed across diverse cultural and historical contexts, from the bundling of ganja in Southeast Asia to the pressing of hash bricks in Central and South Asia.

The primary goal of compression curing is to increase the portability of the final product in the context of cannabis smuggling.

 

The secondary aim (or side effect) of compression curing is to alter the chemical and physical properties of the material through slow, pressure-mediated curing. In cannabis flowers, this can affect terpene volatility, chlorophyll degradation, moisture redistribution, and the tactile character of the product. Compression slows aerobic processes by limiting oxygen exchange while creating localized microenvironments that encourage partial anaerobic activity. In hashish, prolonged compression has been linked to further decarboxylation, darkening of resin, and changes in consistency and aroma.

This method is especially relevant where cannabis must be transported, concealed, or stored for long durations. For example, in Thai and Lao contexts, compression curing enabled the production of durable, transport-ready units such as Thai sticks and bricks, facilitating smuggling routes through Southeast Asia during the Cold War era. In Himalayan and Maghrebi hashish traditions, compression after sieving and pressing helps consolidate loose trichome resin into cohesive, ageable masses.

 

Compression curing may last from several days to many months, depending on the form and intended outcome. Excessive moisture or poor environmental control during this process can result in anaerobic fermentation, microbial degradation, or terpene loss. While some users and traditional producers describe psychoactive distinctions associated with well-cured, compressed cannabis, these claims remain anecdotal and under-researched.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Brick Weed

Definition: Cannabis that has been forcibly compressed into bricks, typically for illicit transport, with significant loss of quality, safety, and chemical integrity.

 

Brick weed refers to cannabis compacted into dense rectangular blocks using mechanical or manual pressure, often while still moist or inadequately dried. The process reduces volume for transport and concealment in illicit markets, where bulk, odor, and perishability pose logistical risks. Bricks are typically wrapped in plastic or fabric, stacked, and smuggled over long distances. Excessive compression and improper storage damage trichomes, trap moisture, and accelerate degradation of cannabinoids and terpenes through oxidation, microbial growth, and thermal buildup.

Although brick weed is synonymous with low quality in consumer perception, this is not inherent to the method. Because landrace flowers—especially tropical ones—tend to be loose and high in surface area, they are vulnerable to photooxidation or mold in hot, humid climates. Under ideal conditions, compression can preserve aromatic and structural integrity: in Thailand, high-grade bricks were vacuum-sealed or tightly wrapped and designated by colored foil, with gold indicating premium quality. These bricks were made from well-grown, well-cured material and handled with care. However, as bricks were typically one kilogram or more, only middlemen or dealers saw them fresh. End users received desiccated, oxidized fragments, reinforcing the notion that all brick weed is inherently inferior.

Across Southeast Asia, brick production expanded in the 1980s as U.S.-backed interdiction escalated in Thailand. With aerial surveillance and military operations focused on Isan and the Golden Triangle, production shifted underground and across the Mekong into Laos, where many Thai cultivators had kinship ties³. Large-scale cultivation of Thai and Lao landraces continued, but traditional preparations such as Thai sticks gave way to high-volume pressing. Bricks were made in jungle camps using wooden or metal molds and rudimentary hydraulic jacks, then trafficked overland to Bangkok, Malaysia, or coastal shipping hubs.

The decline in quality was often stark. Bricks contained shredded leaf, stem, seeds, and debris, contaminants including insects, mold, stones, or even dead animals like lizards. Heat and anaerobic conditions during storage led to chemical decomposition and harsh combustion. The transformation from vibrant, resinous flower to black-green sludge was normalized by volume-driven economies.

In India, the practice persists in states such as Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and parts of the Northeast. Cannabis is pressed into bricks while still turgid and green, using makeshift wooden forms or metal trays. These blocks are broken apart and dried before sale as hardened bud-chunks in street markets. Adulteration is widespread: in some areas, pressed ganja is treated with mustard oil (ostensibly to prevent mold) and barbiturates or other unidentified chemicals, likely to alter effect or weight.

In Latin America, especially Paraguay, Brazil, and Mexico, brick weed is known as prensado (from prensar, “to press”). It is typically made from low-grade outdoor crops, compressed while still humid, and wrapped for long-haul trafficking. Before the rise of domestic cultivation, much of the U.S. market was supplied with such bricks, especially from the 1970s through the 1990s. Despite regional variations in scale and materials, the underlying logic of brick weed remains constant: maximize density and invisibility at the expense of quality and safety.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

CObbing

Definition: A low-oxygen curing method in which whole cannabis colas are wrapped and stored under heat and pressure to induce chemical and sensory transformation.

Cobbing is a traditional post-harvest processing method used primarily in parts of East and Southern Africa, most notably in Malawi. In this method, freshly harvested cannabis colas are wrapped tightly in organic material (such as maize husks or banana leaves) to form a “cob.” The cobs are then compressed and stored in warm, dark environments for extended periods, typically weeks to months. This creates an anaerobic, humid, and thermally active microclimate that alters the flower’s chemical composition, texture, and aroma.

The process facilitates a series of endogenous transformations, including enzymatic degradation of chlorophyll, decarboxylation of cannabinoids, and volatilization or alteration of terpenes. These changes often yield a smoother smoke and distinctive aromatic profile, frequently described as earthy, fruity, or spiced. While sometimes referred to as a form of “fermentation,” cobbing does not reliably involve microbial metabolism in the strict biochemical sense. No consistent or beneficial microbial agents have been demonstrated under controlled analysis. The transformations are primarily thermochemical and enzymatic in nature, though microbial risks such as mold growth are significant if moisture and temperature are not carefully controlled.

Modern reinterpretations of the method, often attributed to online contributor “Tangwena,” adapt traditional cobbing into small-batch curing using vacuum sealing, moderate heat (around 40–50°C), and precise humidity control. This adaptation, referred to informally as “Malawi Cob Tek,” reflects a broader resurgence of interest in culturally embedded, non-industrial cannabis curing practices⁵.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Aged Hashish

Definition: Hashish that has undergone extended storage under controlled or semi-controlled conditions, leading to biochemical and sensory changes distinct from its fresh state.

Aged hashish refers to traditional cannabis resin preparations that have been stored for months or years, often in airtight containers, animal skin, or wax-sealed vessels. Over time, the chemical profile of hashish evolves due to slow oxidative and decarboxylative processes. These changes typically involve a gradual conversion of tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) to cannabinol (CBN) via intermediate degradation of THC, resulting in a milder, more sedative psychoactive effect. Additionally, terpenes undergo volatilization and oxidation, leading to reduced aromatic intensity but the emergence of deep, musky, earthy, or leathery notes prized in some regions.

In cultural contexts across Central and South Asia, aging is often viewed as a marker of quality, with certain vintages or long-stored samples fetching premium value due to their perceived smoothness and nuanced effects. This is especially true in regions where hashish is traditionally consumed orally or mixed with tobacco and where resin is pressed into dense blocks, which age slowly and evenly when stored in cool, dark environments. However, the extent and desirability of aging vary regionally, and excessive aging can also lead to loss of potency, oxidation of lipids, and microbial degradation, especially if storage conditions are poor.

There is no standardized method for aging and definitions of optimal duration or quality remain subjective and culturally variable. In some cases, anecdotal reports describe aging hashish for years, though such claims are rarely substantiated or chemically verified. Empirical research on the pharmacological effects of aged resin remains limited and most evidence for its distinctiveness is anecdotal in nature.

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Banana leaf hash

Definition: The use of banana leaves to wrap and cure hashish for preservation and transport.

Banana leaves (Musa spp.) have long been used across parts of South and Southeast Asia as a biodegradable, locally available wrapping material for cannabis preparations.

 

In the context of hashish production, fresh banana leaves are commonly used to encase hand-rubbed resin (charas) or dry sifted hashish, often as part of a short curing or aging process prior to consumption or market sale. The leaves are pliable when fresh and provide a humid microclimate that slows moisture loss. 

In some cases, the banana leaf serves only as a temporary wrapper for daily harvests or transport; in others, it may form part of a longer-term aging process that alters the consistency and aromatic profile of the resin.

 

In Northern India and Nepal, for example, fresh charas is sometimes wrapped in banana leaves and stored in cool, shaded conditions to mellow its harshness. 

This practice is relatively unknown today, perhaps extinct, as modern packaging materials are preferred in most cases. 

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049600.jpg

Extraction

Extraction refers to the process of removing and concentrating the resinous trichomes of the cannabis plant to produce hashish, oils, or other potent derivatives.

In landrace contexts, extraction often refers to traditional mechanical methods such as hand-rubbing (charas) or dry-sieving (kief, hashish), which separate trichomes without the use of solvents. These techniques preserve a broad spectrum of secondary metabolites, making them central to regional pharmacopeias and cultural practice across the Himalayas, Hindu Kush, North Africa, and Central Asia.

Modern extraction techniques include solvent-based methods (e.g., butane, ethanol, CO₂), mechanical pressing (rosin), and fractional distillation, which allow for high-purity concentrates such as isolates or full-spectrum oils. These industrial techniques, while potent, often sacrifice the broader chemical profile found in traditional extracts and are rarely used in landrace-growing regions.

Each method has implications for potency, chemical composition, safety, and cultural relevance. This section contextualizes these processes with an emphasis on their agronomic, chemical, and ethnobotanical dimensions.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Mechanical Extraction

Definition: The physical removal of cannabis glandular trichomes from plant material using mechanical or manual force without solvents.

Mechanical extraction comprises techniques that recover resinous capitate stalked trichomes from cannabis floral matter by applying friction, agitation, vibration, compression, or electrostatic force. Traditional methods include dry sieving with mesh screens, hand‑rubbing (as practiced in Himalayan charas) and tumbling of frozen material.

 

Cold‑water agitation (bubble hash) and rosin pressing from dried flowers or ice‑water hash are modern solventless variants.

These methods exploit the brittle nature of mature glandular trichome heads, which detach under mechanical stress or thermal variation. Output quality depends on cultivar characteristics, harvest timing, plant moisture, temperature control, and operator technique. When implemented correctly, mechanical extraction preserves intact trichome heads and retains native cannabinoid and terpene profiles.

Mechanical extraction sits at the core of many landrace cannabis traditions. Cultural definitions vary: boundaries between charas, sieved hashish, ice‑water hash, and rosin pressing blur in indigenous systems. Novel methods such as electrostatic separation (using triboelectric charge differences between trichomes and plant matter) are emerging at industrial scale, further challenging rigid definitions.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Solvent Based Extraction

Definition: Extraction method that uses chemical solvents to separate cannabinoids, terpenes, and other compounds from cannabis plant material.

Solvent based extraction relies on the principle of selective solubility, using a chemical solvent, typically hydrocarbons (e.g. butane, propane), alcohols (e.g. ethanol), or supercritical fluids (e.g. CO₂ under specific conditions) to dissolve target compounds such as cannabinoids and terpenes. The resulting solution is then subjected to various forms of purification and solvent removal, yielding a concentrated extract that may appear as oil, shatter, wax, or resin depending on technique and post-processing.

Hydrocarbon extraction, especially with butane, has been widely used in artisanal and commercial settings due to its ability to preserve volatile terpenes. Ethanol is commonly favored in regulatory environments for its safety profile and broad-spectrum solubility, though it also extracts chlorophyll and other polar compounds unless refined. Supercritical CO₂ extraction is often marketed as "solventless" due to the absence of residual petrochemicals, but it requires specialized high-pressure equipment and precise control of temperature and pressure to achieve cannabinoid-selective extraction.

Solvent based methods can produce highly potent extracts, often exceeding 80% total cannabinoids. However, their application to landrace cannabis poses challenges, as the nuanced chemotypes of traditional cultivars are more susceptible to terpene degradation during aggressive extraction or post-processing steps such as winterization and vacuum purging. Additionally, many artisanal or indigenous contexts favor mechanical or low-tech resin separation methods aligned with cultural practice and environmental constraints.

The category excludes water-based methods and mechanical techniques such as sieving or pressing. Definitions may blur in cases where hybrid techniques (e.g. ethanol-assisted rosin pressing) are employed, but in most technical contexts, solvent based extraction implies use of a liquid chemical solvent for initial separation.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Solvent Based Extraction

Definition: Extraction method that uses chemical solvents to separate cannabinoids, terpenes, and other compounds from cannabis plant material.

Solvent based extraction relies on the principle of selective solubility, using a chemical solvent, typically hydrocarbons (e.g. butane, propane), alcohols (e.g. ethanol), or supercritical fluids (e.g. CO₂ under specific conditions) to dissolve target compounds such as cannabinoids and terpenes. The resulting solution is then subjected to various forms of purification and solvent removal, yielding a concentrated extract that may appear as oil, shatter, wax, or resin depending on technique and post-processing.

Hydrocarbon extraction, especially with butane, has been widely used in artisanal and commercial settings due to its ability to preserve volatile terpenes. Ethanol is commonly favored in regulatory environments for its safety profile and broad-spectrum solubility, though it also extracts chlorophyll and other polar compounds unless refined. Supercritical CO₂ extraction is often marketed as "solventless" due to the absence of residual petrochemicals, but it requires specialized high-pressure equipment and precise control of temperature and pressure to achieve cannabinoid-selective extraction.

Solvent based methods can produce highly potent extracts, often exceeding 80% total cannabinoids. However, their application to landrace cannabis poses challenges, as the nuanced chemotypes of traditional cultivars are more susceptible to terpene degradation during aggressive extraction or post-processing steps such as winterization and vacuum purging. Additionally, many artisanal or indigenous contexts favor mechanical or low-tech resin separation methods aligned with cultural practice and environmental constraints.

The category excludes water-based methods and mechanical techniques such as sieving or pressing. Definitions may blur in cases where hybrid techniques (e.g. ethanol-assisted rosin pressing) are employed, but in most technical contexts, solvent based extraction implies use of a liquid chemical solvent for initial separation.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Charas

Definition: Hand-rubbed resin collected from the flowering parts of live cannabis plants, traditionally prepared in the Himalayan region.

Charas is a manually extracted form of cannabis resin, produced by rubbing the flowering tops of live, mature cannabis plants between the hands to collect trichome-rich exudate. This process, typically carried out during the late flowering period, results in a pliable, dark-colored resin that is then shaped into balls, sticks, or other forms for curing and storage. Unlike sieved hashish made from dried plant material, charas is extracted from fresh, living plants, which may contribute to differences in terpene profile and cannabinoid composition due to the presence of unoxidized resins and residual moisture.

Charas is most closely associated with high-altitude cannabis cultivation in India, Nepal, and parts of Pakistan, where the practice has deep cultural and religious significance. In India, it has historically been used in ascetic Shaivite traditions and is still ritually consumed in contexts such as Holi and Maha Shivaratri. In some Himalayan villages, charas production remains a seasonal agricultural practice integrated into broader subsistence strategies. The technique may vary by region, with notable differences in timing, pressure and curing methods, though the essential method (rubbing live plants) is consistent.

The term “charas” has at times been ambiguously conflated with hashish more generally, but its defining characteristic is the use of fresh plant material. No mechanical separation or solvents are employed in traditional charas making. While the practice has faced legal restrictions under modern drug laws, it persists in remote mountain regions and has recently attracted renewed interest from the cannabis community.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Hash (Hashish)

Definition: Compressed resin derived from the trichomes of Cannabis sativa L., typically obtained through mechanical or hand-rubbed extraction methods.

 

Hashish is a traditional cannabis concentrate composed primarily of glandular trichomes (particularly capitate-stalked trichomes) separated from the plant material and compressed into solid form. Depending on the extraction technique, hash may include varying proportions of resin, waxes, cuticular fragments, and fine plant material. It is commonly produced through dry sieving (sifting), hand-rubbing, or ice-water agitation, each method reflecting distinct regional practices and material consistencies.

In regions such as the Hindu Kush, Himalayas, Rif, and Bekaa Valley, hashish production has long been integrated into agroecological and cultural systems, with local landraces often selected for resin yield, trichome structure, and aroma profile. The resultant material may be worked extensively by hand or pressed using heat and pressure to alter its consistency and aromatic expression, a process that also promotes decarboxylation and transformation of cannabinoids like THCA into psychoactive THC.

Hashish is traditionally consumed via smoking or ingestion, with historical use across Central Asia, North Africa, and the Indian subcontinent dating back centuries. Its global dissemination accelerated during the 20th century, although its legal and social status remains contested. In modern markets, solventless and solvent-based concentrates are sometimes marketed interchangeably with hash, contributing to definitional ambiguity.

 

Ethnobotanical distinctions are especially important in landrace contexts, where "hash" typically refers to mechanically or hand-extracted, whole-plant resin, in contrast to chemically isolated concentrates.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Kief

Definition: The mechanically separated resin glands of the cannabis plant, traditionally collected through dry sieving.

Kief consists primarily of trichome heads dislodged from the surface of mature cannabis flowers and, to a lesser extent, small stalk fragments and plant debris. It is produced by rubbing dried plant material over a fine-mesh screen, a method widely used in North Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia as a preliminary stage in traditional hashish production. The goal is to isolate resin-rich particles from inert vegetal matter while preserving the broad-spectrum chemical profile inherent to landrace cultivars.

In traditional contexts, kief is typically not consumed directly but pressed into hashish through manual or mechanical means. The quality of kief depends on multiple factors, including trichome maturity, drying conditions, mesh size, and the skill of the processor. Fine sieves and cold, dry environments favor the production of high-grade material with minimal contamination from plant matter.

The term kief (Arabic: كيف‎, kayf, lit. 'pleasure' or 'intoxication') varies in meaning across regions. In Morocco, it may refer to a blend of powdered cannabis and tobacco for pipe smoking, while in Western usage it is often synonymous with unpressed trichome powder.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Resin

Definition: Lipophilic secretion produced in glandular trichomes of Cannabis containing cannabinoids, terpenes, and other secondary metabolites.

Resin in cannabis refers to the viscous exudate synthesized and stored primarily in the capitate-stalked glandular trichomes on the surface of female inflorescences. It contains a complex mixture of bioactive compounds, notably phytocannabinoids (such as Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] and cannabidiol [CBD]), terpenoids, and flavonoids, embedded in a waxy lipid matrix that functions in plant defense and ecological signaling.

 

Biosynthesis of resin components occurs in specialized secretory cells and is influenced by genetic, developmental, and environmental factors. Resin serves multiple ecological functions, including UV protection, pathogen resistance, and deterrence of herbivores. In traditional contexts, especially among landrace cannabis cultivators, resin is manually collected from live or dried plant surfaces for the production of hashish via mechanical extraction methods such as rubbing, sieving, or pressing.

 

There is some ambiguity in regional terminology. In scientific contexts, "resin" refers strictly to the natural exudate produced by the plant. In vernacular usage, however, it may also denote processed cannabis concentrates derived from this exudate (e.g., hand-rubbed charas or sieved hashish), which can lead to confusion.

 

Resin content and composition vary significantly across cannabis populations, with marked differences between domesticated landraces, feral plants, and commercial hybrids. These differences are influenced by selective pressures on trichome morphology, resin gland density, and biosynthetic pathways.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Dry sift

Definition: Mechanically separated trichome heads collected through dry screening of cannabis plant material.

Dry sift refers to a traditional solventless extraction method that isolates glandular trichomes from dried cannabis using mesh screens. The process relies on friction and gravity to break trichomes away from dried flowers, leaves, or stems, allowing them to fall through screens of specific micron sizes. The resulting material, also known as kief or sift, varies in purity depending on screen size, plant material condition, and technique.

 

Dry sifting is among the oldest methods of resin separation, practiced across Central and South Asia for centuries as a step in hashish production. In contexts where landrace cultivars dominate, dry sift is commonly used in both artisan and large-scale hashish manufacture, especially in regions like Afghanistan and parts of India where sieved resin is later hand-pressed or aged. Modern refinements include the use of multiple screen stacks and controlled environments to reduce static cling and improve trichome head separation.

 

The method preserves the terpene and cannabinoid profile of the original plant better than heat-based or solvent-based techniques, though it may also include non-glandular contaminants like pistils or plant fragments if not carefully processed. The term "dry sift" is sometimes inconsistently applied in contemporary usage to refer both to unpressed raw kief and to finished hash made from sifting; such ambiguities depend on the individual and on context.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Water extraction

Definition: The mechanical separation of cannabis trichomes using cold water and ice as a medium for agitation and filtration.

Water extraction refers to a non-solvent technique that isolates resin glands (trichomes) from cannabis plant material by submerging it in ice-cold water and applying physical agitation. The brittle trichomes detach and sink due to their density, while lighter plant material floats or remains suspended. The resulting slurry is passed through a series of fine-micron mesh screens or filter bags (commonly called bubble bags) graded by pore size to capture trichomes of differing diameters.

Unlike dry sieving, water extraction is more gentle in the manner in which it separates the trichome heads from their stalks and reduces the presence of contaminants such as dust, hairs, or cuticular fragments. However, it requires careful control of temperature, agitation intensity, and drying conditions to preserve quality and prevent microbial growth. While widely adopted in industrial and artisanal settings for high-yield hashish production, the technique is a new arrival in landrace-producing regions, where traditional dry or hand-rubbed methods predominate. 

 

The term "ice water extraction" is often used interchangeably, though technically the process does not rely on ice alone but on maintaining low temperatures to prevent trichome rupture. Some ambiguity exists in terminology, particularly in colloquial use of "bubble hash," which refers to the end product that bubbles when exposed to flame but does not specify the extraction method.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Rosin

Definition: Solventless cannabis extract produced by applying controlled heat and pressure to glandular trichomes.

Rosin is a mechanical extract obtained by pressing cannabis plant material( typically flowers, hashish, or sifted trichomes) between heated plates to rupture capitate stalked trichomes and release their resin. The resulting substance is a viscous concentrate composed of trichome-derived lipids, cannabinoids, and terpenes. Unlike hydrocarbon or alcohol-based extracts, rosin is produced without chemical solvents, making it a popular method among small-scale producers seeking cleaner and less industrial processing techniques.

Temperature and pressure settings, along with moisture content and trichome maturity, significantly influence both the yield and chemical profile of the extract. Low-temperature, short-duration presses are generally favored for preserving monoterpenes and minimizing degradation of thermolabile compounds, while higher pressures and temperatures may increase yield at the cost of flavor and volatile retention. The method is commonly used on dry sift or bubble hash to produce "hash rosin," which typically yields a higher-grade product than flower rosin due to greater trichome purity.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049600.jpg

Preparations

In landrace traditions, cannabis is not consumed raw. Preparation transforms the plant into a usable form through physical, thermal, or chemical processes, often embedded in ritual, medicine, or daily use.

These transformations affect not only potency and bioavailability but also align cannabis with specific cultural meanings and therapeutic functions.

 

This section focuses on defining practices that make cannabis suitable for ingestion, inhalation, or topical application.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Ganja

Definition: Cannabis cultivated and prepared specifically for its dried, resinous female inflorescences, traditionally used for smoking or ingestion.

Ganja refers to both the dried inflorescences of unpollinated female Cannabis sativa plants and also to the plant types selectively cultivated to produce them.

 

The term is of Sanskrit origin (gañjā) and entered widespread global usage via Indo-Caribbean and Rastafari networks during the colonial and postcolonial eras. In its historical South Asian context, particularly in India and Nepal, ganja has been differentiated from bhang (leaf preparations) and charas (hand-rubbed resin), with official distinctions codified during the British colonial era.

Agronomically, ganja-type plants are typically selected for tall but sparsely branched architecture, with dense terminal inflorescences and high trichome density on calyces and sugar leaves. Cultivators traditionally removed male plants to prevent pollination, promoting greater resin production in female flowers. Ganja is usually cured by shade-drying and may be further processed via cobbing or compression for preservation and transport.

Ethnobotanical and pharmacological studies associate ganja with high concentrations of Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), although its chemotypic profile varies by landrace, cultivation method, and preparation. In global usage, “ganja” has been generalized to mean cannabis flower more broadly, especially via Caribbean and Rastafari contexts, but the term retains specific taxonomic and preparation significance in the Indo-Nepalese and Southeast Asian context.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Smoking mixture

Definition: Preparations combining cannabis with one or more additional plant materials for the purpose of combustion and inhalation.

Smoking mixtures are a widespread mode of cannabis administration across landrace-growing regions, often incorporating locally available non-cannabis plant matter such as tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), dried leaves, bark, or aromatic herbs. These admixtures can modulate the burn rate, influence taste and aroma, reduce the potency per volume, or serve cultural and ritual purposes.

In South and Southeast Asia, cannabis is frequently blended with tobacco in hand-rolled cigarettes, packed into bongs or chillums. In North Africa, kif preparations traditionally include a mixture of finely chopped cannabis and Nicotiana rustica or N. tabacum, smoked using long-stemmed pipes such as sebsi.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Cannabis as food (Edibles)

Definition: Cannabis edibles are food preparations containing cannabinoids, typically intended for oral ingestion and systemic absorption via the digestive tract.

Edible preparations (edibles) are a longstanding method of cannabis consumption across multiple cultural contexts, especially in South and Central Asia, where traditional forms such as bhang (an infusion of cannabis leaf and flower in milk or ghee) are associated with ritual, medicinal, and recreational use.

 

In contrast to inhaled forms, edibles deliver cannabinoids through first-pass metabolism in the liver, resulting in the conversion of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) into 11-hydroxy-THC, a metabolite with greater potency and longer-lasting psychoactive effects.

The onset of effects is typically delayed (often 30 minutes to 2 hours) depending on factors such as stomach contents, individual metabolism, and the composition of the edible. Lipid-based carriers, such as ghee or coconut oil, are commonly used to enhance the bioavailability of cannabinoids due to their lipophilic nature.

 

Traditional preparations often make use of whole plant material, including both leaf and inflorescence, whereas modern commercial products frequently employ refined extracts or distillates to achieve standardized dosing.

There is considerable regional and historical variation in the consumption of cannabis as a culinary herb, food or drink.

 

In India, bhang, consumed as goli or in drinks such as Lassi or Thandai remains a common preparation during religious festivals, while in Southeast Asia, Cannabis was traditionally consumed as medicated honey or as an ingredient in medicinal, cannabis infused soups.

 

In contemporary global markets, the term “edibles” encompasses a broad range of infused foods, including baked goods, confectionery, beverages, and encapsulated oils.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Bhang

Definition: An edible preparation made from the leaves and small flowering tops of the cannabis plant, traditionally consumed as a drink in parts of South Asia.

Bhang is a psychoactive preparation made by grinding immature cannabis flowers and leaves into a paste and blending it with liquids such as milk, yogurt, or water. It is typically spiced and sweetened before consumption. Bhang has been used for centuries in religious, cultural, and medicinal contexts across northern India and Nepal, particularly during festivals like Holi and Maha Shivaratri. Its preparation and usage differ significantly from that of concentrated resin-based preparations such as charas or hashish, relying instead on relatively low-potency plant material and ingestion rather than inhalation.

The psychotropic effects of bhang are delayed due to first-pass metabolism of cannabinoids in the liver, where Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is converted into the more potent metabolite 11-hydroxy-THC¹. This pharmacokinetic difference results in a distinct experiential profile, typically longer-lasting and more body-centered than that of smoked cannabis.

Unlike modern edibles derived from standardized extracts, bhang preparations vary widely in potency and cannabinoid content due to differences in plant material, dosage, and lipid availability for cannabinoid absorption². In many parts of India, especially Uttar Pradesh, government-licensed bhang shops operate under regulated supply chains that exclude high-potency resin or flower in favor of leaf-based material.

The term “bhang” is sometimes used ambiguously to refer both to the raw plant material and to the prepared beverage, depending on regional context. While bhang is often consumed for its intoxicating effects, it has also been historically referenced in Ayurveda as having analgesic, digestive, and anxiolytic properties, although such claims remain largely anecdotal in the absence of rigorous clinical trials.

The word "Bhang" and variations thereof is also used to refer to feral cannabis plant types in certain parts of South Asia. 

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Bhang Lassi/Thandai

Definition: Traditional Indian beverages infused with a cannabis leaf preparation known as bhang, typically consumed during specific religious festivals and rituals.

Bhang lassi and bhang thandai are regional variations of cannabis-infused dairy drinks prepared using Cannabis sativa leaves often from landrace or feral populations cultivated or collected in North India. Both drinks use bhang paste as the active ingredient, which is made by grinding cannabis leaves and sometimes flowers with water and straining to remove fibrous material. The paste is then mixed into a base of yogurt (lassi) or milk with spices, nuts, and sugar (thandai), often served chilled.

Bhang thandai is most associated with northern states like Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan, especially during festivals such as Holi and Maha Shivratri, where it is ritually consumed by Shaiva devotees and sadhus as an offering to Shiva. While bhang lassi is sometimes used interchangeably with thandai in casual speech, the two differ in consistency and preparation: lassi is yogurt-based and thicker, while thandai is milk-based and more aromatic, often containing fennel, cardamom, saffron, and rose petals.

The pharmacological effect of bhang drinks depends on dosage, decarboxylation during preparation, and individual metabolism. Bhang paste typically undergoes some heating during grinding or mixing, enabling partial decarboxylation of THCA to THC, though potency remains variable and may be mild to moderately psychoactive unless large quantities are used.

The legality of bhang preparations in India is ambiguous and varies by state. Under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (1985), cannabis resin and flowers are illegal, but the use of leaves and immature flowers (from which bhang is traditionally made) is often permitted or tolerated.

Modern usage of bhang lassi and thandai is most often cultural and ritualistic, with limited therapeutic or recreational application outside specific festivals. 

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Goli

Definition: Hand-rolled cannabis pills or balls traditionally made from fresh or prepared bhang paste, often consumed orally in North India.

Goli (lit. "pill" in Hindi) refers to a traditional preparation of cannabis in the form of compacted spheres or tablets composed of bhang. In North Indian contexts, goli are often consumed during religious festivals such as Holi and Shivratri, either as a stand-alone edible or blended into beverages to make bhang lassi or thandai.

Unlike strained liquid preparations, goli retains the full plant matter, including fibrous and lipid-soluble cannabinoids. The paste is often kneaded by hand, sometimes mixed with spices or sweeteners, and formed into marble-sized balls. The psychoactive effects depend on dosage, the preparation’s potency, and the metabolic conversion of Δ⁹-THC to 11-hydroxy-THC in the liver, which results in delayed but often more intense effects compared to inhalation.

While primarily associated with informal or ritualistic consumption, goli is also used as a dosage form for medicinal cannabis within traditional Ayurvedic practice, particularly in analgesic and antispasmodic applications. However, precise dosing is rarely standardized. 

Ambiguity exists: in the context of cannabis, the term “goli” may refer broadly to any small edible cannabis based pellet.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Majoun

Definition: Cannabis-infused sweet traditionally prepared in North Africa using a base of dried fruits, nuts, spices, and fat.

Majoun (also spelled ma'joun or majoon) is a psychoactive edible made by incorporating hashish or other cannabis preparations into a dense confection, typically consisting of dates, figs, almonds or walnuts, ghee or butter, and warming spices such as cinnamon, cardamom, and nutmeg. It is commonly associated with Moroccan and broader Maghrebi culinary traditions, where it has been consumed both recreationally and in spiritual or mystical contexts. The preparation method generally involves first decarboxylating and cooking cannabis in fat to extract cannabinoids, which are then blended with the other ingredients to form a pliable paste or ball.

 

Majoun exemplifies a long-standing regional adaptation of edible cannabis consumption rooted in traditional cuisine and local pharmacopeias. Its effects are prolonged and often intense due to the high fat content facilitating cannabinoid absorption. While typically made with kif or hashish derived from local landrace cultivars, the precise composition and potency vary widely. 

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Dawamesc

Definition: A North African cannabis edible made by blending hashish with sweetened fats, spices, and nuts, most famously recorded in colonial Algeria.

Dawamesc refers to a traditional cannabis preparation originating in Algeria and reported in other Arab contexts, typically consisting of cannabis tops or hashish combined with sugar, orange juice, cinnamon, cloves, cardamom, nutmeg, musk, pistachios, and pine nuts. The mixture forms a dense, aromatic paste intended for oral consumption in small doses due to its high potency. Its most widely cited formulation comes from Dr. Jacques-Joseph Moreau, whose 1845 treatise introduced dawamesc to French psychiatric and literary circles.

The preparation reflects the broader pharmacological principle of combining decarboxylated cannabinoids with fats to facilitate gastrointestinal absorption. Like many traditional edibles, its efficacy depends on lipid solubility and the synergistic action of aromatic spices, some of which may contribute mild stimulant or digestive effects.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049600.jpg

Implements

Cannabis consumption in landrace contexts relies on a wide range of implements shaped by local materials, habits and knowledge systems.

 

Implements are rarely standardized and often improvised, passed down through practice rather than written instruction.

The form and use of an implement reflect regional conditions: clay where there is clay, bamboo where there is bamboo and evolve within social and ecological constraints. Some are closely associated with specific preparations or ceremonies; others persist in everyday use with little symbolic meaning. What unites them is not their material or function, but their embeddedness in vernacular systems of cannabis use.

This section will define important implements for the consumption of landrace Cannabis. 

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Pipes

Definition: Inhalation implements consisting of a bowl and a stem, used to smoke cannabis and other botanicals.

Pipes are one of the oldest and most widespread tools for cannabis consumption, enabling the user to combust plant material and inhale the resulting smoke.

The earliest direct archaeological evidence of cannabis being smoked via pipes originates from Ethiopia, specifically from ceramic water‑pipe bowls recovered from Lalibela Cave¹, where chemical analysis detected THC residue². Radiocarbon dating places these artifacts around 1320 AD. These bowls strongly suggest intentional inhalation of cannabis smoke using pipe‑like implements before the global diffusion of tobacco and pipe technology from the New World.

 

Designs vary in complexity, material, and regional specificity, but all include a combustion chamber (bowl) and a passage (stem) for drawing smoke into the mouth or lungs.

 

Traditional cannabis-smoking pipes are often handcrafted from clay, wood, stone, or metal, and exhibit distinct regional characteristics shaped by local material culture, spiritual practices, and inhalation techniques.

While modern mass-produced glass pipes are widespread globally, traditional cannabis pipes remain in use across parts of South and Central Asia, Africa, and the Caribbean, often linked to specific cultural or religious settings. Terminological distinctions between pipe types; such as chillum, kiseru or sebsi are culturally embedded and not always interchangeable.

References:

  1. Dombrowski, J. C. 1971. Excavations in Ethiopia: Lalibela and Natchabiet Caves, Begemeder Province. Boston University, Ph.D. thesis.

  2. Nikolaas van der Merwe, Cannabis Smoking in 13th-14th Century Ethiopia: Chemical Evidence. (unknown date or publisher, possibly a thesis paper) [Link]

Related terms: [Soil] | [Nutrients] | [Micronutrient] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Sebsi

Definition: A traditional Moroccan cannabis pipe used primarily for smoking kief.

The sebsi is a long-stemmed, narrow-bowled pipe traditionally used in Morocco to smoke sifted cannabis trichomes, known locally as kief. Typically composed of a wooden stem (often over 30 cm in length) and a small clay or metal bowl called a skuff, the sebsi delivers a small, concentrated inhalation intended for ritualized or measured consumption.

 

The narrow bore and length of the stem cool the smoke, while the small bowl size limits dosage, aligning with the social and spiritual context in which the sebsi is often used.

 

The pipe is typically smoked communally, sometimes as part of Sufi ritual practices or informal gatherings among jmaʿa (smoking circles).

The sebsi is closely associated with the Rif and Pre-Rif regions of northern Morocco, where traditional hashish production remains widespread. Its design facilitates the consumption of dry-sifted cannabis preparations that are uncompressed and relatively low in oil content, as opposed to resinous or modern solvent-extracted products. The use of fine screen siftings and gentle combustion (typically with a match rather than a lighter) is key to the sebsi’s intended function.

While the sebsi remains widely recognized as a symbol of Moroccan cannabis culture, its form and usage have increasingly been supplanted by modern implements such as glass pipes and rolling papers. Still, the sebsi endures in artisanal contexts and among rural communities, where it retains both functional and cultural value.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Chillum 

Definition: A conical smoking pipe traditionally used in South Asia and other cultures to smoke herbs such as cannabis or charas.

Chillums consist of a straight conical or cylindrical tube, typically made from clay, soft stone (e.g. steatite), wood, or animal horn. They range from approximately three to six inches in length and lack ancillary airflow controls such as carb holes. A small stone or stopper may be inserted into the stem to prevent ash from being inhaled and improve cooling.

Historically, the chillum emerged in South Asia, notably India, by at least the eighteenth century, where Hindu ascetics (sadhus) used them to smoke cannabis resin (charas) during devotional practices associated with Lord Shiva.

 

The form subsequently spread across Africa and into Rastafari rituals, where cow‑horn or wooden chillums with long draw‑tubes are used in communal “reasoning sessions”.

Contested definitions arise concerning the distinction between chillum, chalice and bong in Rastafari practice: some systems label long stemmed water‑filtered versions as “chalices” rather than chillums. Clarity is essential: chillum refers strictly to the simple unfiltered pipe.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Italian Chillums

Definition: High-grade chillums made with imported Italian clay, valued in India for their smooth draw, aesthetic craftsmanship, and status among connoisseurs.

Italian chillums refer to a category of premium clay pipes either handcrafted in Italy or produced in India using imported Italian clay. These chillums are widely regarded as the highest quality available in India today and are commonly found in regions with long-standing cannabis and hashish cultures such as Himachal Pradesh, Kashmir, Pushkar, and Goa.

 

Unlike mass-produced Indian chillums made from low-fired, porous local clays, Italian chillums are crafted from fine Tuscan clay that is fired at significantly higher temperatures, typically around 950–1000 °C. The result is a denser, more durable ceramic that remains cool during smoking and resists residue buildup. This material difference gives Italian chillums a smoother, cleaner smoke and a distinctive tactile quality—dense, weighty, and finely finished.

Most Italian chillums fall into two categories:

  1. Imported Italian-made chillums, often designed by European artisans such as Kaio or Alverman, known for their clean lines, glazed finishes, and precision.

  2. Indian-made chillums using Italian clay, crafted by artists like Ma De and Kaseki who work in India but source premium clay from Italy. These often incorporate local motifs and design elements but maintain the material and firing standards of their Italian counterparts.

 

Prices vary widely depending on the maker and finish, but many Italian chillums sell for between ₹10,000 and ₹20,000. High-end, bespoke, or collector’s pieces may exceed ₹50,000. These pipes are primarily distributed through niche shops and artisan vendors in festival circuits and tourist hubs like the tourist markets in Goa, Pushkar and the Himalayas during their respective 'seasons'. 

Italian chillums are favored not just for smoking quality but for the connoisseur culture they represent. They are collected, traded, and often treated with ritual care by serious users of charas or hashish. In some circles, they function as prestige items, connoting a deeper connection to the culture of chillum smoking than standard commercial versions.

The term “Italian chillum” can sometimes be misleadingly applied to any well-made chillum with a smooth finish, but among knowledgeable users, it refers specifically to pipes made by specific artists with genuine Italian clay and high-fire ceramic techniques. While there is no historical lineage connecting Italy to chillum usage, the material has become an aspirational standard in India’s modern hashish scene.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

BAnana Leaf Chillum

Definition: Small improvised conical smoking tube fashioned by rolling banana leaf layers

A banana leaf chillum is crafted by folding and rolling a portion of banana leaf into a conical tube used to smoke dried herbal substances. The rolled tip is compressed to form a bowl, while the hollow stem functions as a mouthpiece.

Banana leaves offer a flexible, water‑rich botanical substrate that can be shaped easily when fresh. Users typically roll, compress, and secure the leaf (sometimes with a small sharp stick, thread or natural fiber) to maintain structure. Such chillums are employed where conventional pipes are unavailable, especially in agricultural or rural contexts. The banana leaf material does not burn, though it may char quickly and requires frequent replacement. 

A small wad of balled up banana leaf may be used as a chillum 'stone'. 

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Chillum Stone

Definition: Porous or carved stone insert used as a filter at the base of a chillum to prevent inhalation of ash and particulate matter.

The chillum stone is a critical functional component in traditional chillum pipes, serving as a rudimentary filter. Typically made from fired clay, pumice, soapstone, or carved ceramic, the stone is placed at the narrow base of the chillum cone, above which cannabis is packed. Its perforations allow airflow while preventing plant material and embers from being drawn into the smoker’s mouth or lungs. The stone also aids in heat dissipation, reducing the temperature of the smoke slightly before inhalation.

In North Indian and Nepali chillum traditions, the stone is often handmade and reused across multiple sessions or even the entire life of the chilum. Its form varies from a simple flat disc with holes to more complex conical or stacked designs. In some cases, smokers substitute the stone with a tightly rolled banana leaf or small pebbles when traditional stones are unavailable.

 

Resin buildup over time can affect airflow, requiring regular cleaning or replacement. Unlike modern glass filters or mesh screens, the chillum stone reflects a low-tech, artisanal approach to cannabis consumption that remains central to rural and ascetic practices, particularly among sadhus and babas.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Safi

Definition: A safi is a small square or rolled piece of cloth used in the preparation and consumption of cannabis via chillum pipes.

 

Inserted at the mouthpiece of the chillum, the safi is often dampened with water and functions as a filter, cooling the smoke and trapping ash, debris during inhalation.

 

Common materials include cotton gauze or finely woven cloth; in ritual settings, particularly among Shaivite practitioners, a red-colored safi is preferred for its spiritual symbolism.

In traditional use, the safi is also employed for cleaning: wrapped around the chillum stick, it scrapes resin and residue from the pipe’s interior and polishes the stone between uses. Among connoisseurs and in highland regions such as Malana or parts of Himachal Pradesh, the safi is typically discarded after a single session to preserve purity of taste and effect. In less affluent or more utilitarian contexts, safi may be reused multiple times.

The practice of using a safi reflects both practical smoking technique and broader values around ritual cleanliness, purity of substance and social etiquette during communal chillum sessions.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Chillum Cleaning Stick

Definition: Slender rod used to clean the bore of a chillum and maintain airflow after smoking.

The chillum cleaning stick is a simple implement used to clear resin and debris from the interior of a chillum. Cleaning is typically done after each bowl to prevent clogging and preserve airflow, especially with high-quality chillums. The cleaning stick is wrapped with a safi and used to clean the chillum stone and interior wall. 

Improvised versions such as metal wire or thin twigs are common, especially in rural settings with cheap quasi-disposable clay chillum. However, purpose-made cleaning sticks are sold alongside high-end chillums in specialized shops catering to connoisseurs and tourists in regions such as Pushkar, Kasol, and Goa. These are typically turned from wood, sometimes bamboo and resemble slender wands. 

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Mixing Bowl

Definition: A vessel used to blend cannabis with other plant material prior to smoking, most often in chillum or pipe preparations.

In traditional cannabis consumption practices across South and Central Asia, the mixing bowl (or pouch) is a utilitarian implement used to combine prepared cannabis (typically hand-rubbed charas or dried flower) with admixtures such as tobacco or other herbs before packing into a chillum or pipe.

 

This preparatory step serves practical purposes: evenly distributing the active resin, enhancing combustion, and regulating potency. Mixing is typically done by hand, with small ceramic, brass, or stainless steel bowls or leather pouches serving as the receptacle. The bowl may also be used to hold a safi or chillum stone prior to assembly.

The use of a dedicated bowl ensures cleaner handling and consistency during group sessions. Among connoisseur chillum users, such as in Goa, Pushkar, Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh and parts of Uttarakhand, a clean and properly sized mixing bowl is considered an essential element of the ritual, reinforcing norms of hygiene and preparation etiquette. In these contexts, the mixing bowl is often reserved exclusively for cannabis use, with some users preferring unglazed or non-reactive materials to avoid any impact on aroma or flavor.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Bamboo Bong

Definition: A tubular water pipe traditionally made from a section of bamboo used to inhale cannabis smoke after filtration through water.

Bamboo bongs are widely used in Southeast and East Asia, particularly in rural contexts where cannabis is consumed using locally available materials. The design typically involves a single bamboo culm with one sealed end acting as a water chamber, a vertical shaft serving as the mouthpiece, and a lateral inlet for a bowl or stem. The water cools and partially filters the smoke, allowing for larger inhalations compared to dry pipe methods.

Among Tai-speaking and Austroasiatic communities, bamboo bongs are associated with subsistence cannabis use rather than ritual or high-status connoisseurship. They are often improvised, reflecting practical knowledge of bamboo’s structural and microbial properties, namely its natural segmentation, ease of boring, and resistance to rot. Unlike industrial glass bongs, these are typically single-user implements, cleaned infrequently and discarded or replaced when fouled. In Laos, Isan, Northern Thailand, and parts of Yunnan, such bongs are sometimes associated with laborers or shifting cultivators and may coexist with traditional pipe forms such as terracotta bowls or rolled leaves.

Because the term “bong” originates from the Thai word baung (บ้อง), meaning a cylindrical bamboo tube, there is semantic ambiguity between the object’s linguistic root and its appropriation in global cannabis culture. In international usage, “bong” now refers broadly to water pipes of various materials, obscuring its regional and material specificity.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Water pipe

Definition: A device used to smoke cannabis through water filtration, typically consisting of a bowl, a stem, and a water-filled chamber.

Water pipes reduce the temperature and modify the texture of inhaled cannabis smoke by passing it through water. This process cools the smoke and removes some water-soluble particulates and hydrophilic compounds, though it does not significantly reduce the intake of cannabinoids such as THC. While the filtration effect of water pipes is often perceived as beneficial, studies have shown mixed results regarding their impact on overall toxin exposure².

Traditional water pipes are found across numerous cultures, with archaeological and ethnographic evidence from Africa, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia. In regions like Ethiopia and Tanzania, water pipes constructed from locally available materials such as gourds, wood, and animal horns have long been used to smoke cannabis. In South and Southeast Asia, especially Thailand and Laos, bamboo water pipes are common and often used interchangeably with dry pipes depending on context.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Hookah

Definition: A water pipe traditionally used for smoking tobacco or cannabis preparations, consisting of a bowl, water chamber, hose, and mouthpiece.

 

The hookah, also known regionally as nargileh, shisha, or huqqa, is a multi-part smoking device that cools and filters smoke through water before inhalation. Its use is widespread across South Asia, the Middle East, North Africa, and parts of Central Asia. While primarily associated with flavored tobacco (mu‘assel), the hookah has historically been employed for smoking cannabis, particularly in regions where charas or ganja was mixed with tobacco and packed into the bowl. The combustion product travels through a submerged stem into a water chamber, allowing the smoke to be cooled before it is drawn through a flexible hose.

 

Hookahs vary in form and material depending on geography and social context, ranging from ornate metal and glass constructions to simple, utilitarian setups.

 

In some Himalayan communities, especially in Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand, hookahs are used to smoke charas-tobacco mixtures, sometimes shared communally during winter gatherings or ritual observances.

 

Unlike chillums or bamboo bongs, which deliver direct, hot smoke, hookahs produce a smoother inhalation experience, potentially altering cannabinoid uptake dynamics due to cooling and filtration. 

 

The origin of the hookah is debated, with early prototypes possibly emerging in Safavid Persia or Mughal India in the 16th century, though earlier water pipe use has been documented in Africa. The term huqqa derives from Hindustani and Persian, spreading across Islamic and post-Islamic trade networks alongside tobacco and cannabis diffusion.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Afghan Chillum

Definition: A hand‑held wooden or clay water‑filtered pipe used traditionally in Afghanistan for smoking hashish.

Afghan chillums typically consist of a clay or wooden conical bowl attached to a short water jar through which smoke bubbles before inhalation. They differ from Indian clay chillums by incorporating a basic water filtration system and being used primarily for charas-style hashish rather than cannabis flower. These chillums are common in northern Afghan hashish houses; social spaces where local growers and consumers gather, often during harvest season, to sample and compare freshly prepared hashish.

Culturally, the Afghan chillum plays a central role in communal cannabis rituals and village hospitality, especially in regions like Balkh and Nangarhar. Use tends to focus on sharing strong charas among acquaintances in early morning gatherings and chillum rooms built for guests.

 

They are distinct from tobacco hookahs historically more widespread in South Asia; Afghan usage centers on hashish derived from endemic landrace cannabis populations.

Some sources suggest a Sufi-origin myth linking the chillum to Baba Ku, a legendary healer credited with introducing hashish to the region. 

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

GALYAN

Definition: A traditional Middle Eastern water pipe used for smoking moistened tobacco mixtures, commonly referred to as shīsha.

The galyān is a multi-part water pipe originating in Persia, comprising a bowl (sar), a body (badaneh), a water jar (shīsheh), and a hose (safīr) with a mouthpiece (dahanī). It functions by drawing smoke through water to cool and filter it before inhalation. The term galyān is distinctively Persian and predates the widespread use of the Turkish-derived “nargile” or the Arabic “shīsha.”

Historically associated with Safavid courtly and elite leisure culture from the 16th century onward, the galyān was commonly used to smoke tabāq: a moistened, flavored tobacco blend sometimes mixed with molasses or spices. While cannabis was occasionally consumed via galyān in certain contexts, its use was overwhelmingly for tobacco.

The apparatus spread throughout West, Central, and South Asia via trade and imperial patronage, evolving into regional forms such as the Indian huqqah and the Turkish nargile. In contemporary Iranian and Afghan contexts, the term galyān still refers specifically to traditional water pipes used in social settings, often distinct from modern commercial hookahs in both form and cultural valence.

There is some ambiguity in terminology across regions. While “hookah” and “shīsha” are commonly used in English, especially in reference to modern flavored-tobacco devices, “galyān” is a linguistically and historically specific term, most accurate when referring to Persianate cultural zones.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Chopping Board

Definition: A flat surface used to break down dried cannabis flowers for consumption.

In cannabis contexts, chopping boards serve as a simple alternative to grinders for preparing flower before packing into chillums, pipes, bongs, or joints. They are typically used alongside a knife (often a curved, half-moon blade) to mince the material to a workable consistency.

 

Common in Southeast Asia, India and Nepal, especially where charas or ganja is shared in group settings, the chopping board allows for fast, large-scale processing.

 

Over time, frequent use creates deep grooves in the board’s surface. These grooves are sometimes seen as marks of experience, with heavier wear implying a more seasoned or dedicated smoker. Boards vary in material, but hard wood is favored.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049600.jpg

Breeding

Cannabis breeding refers to the intentional management of plant reproduction to shape heritable traits across generations. This includes practices such as open pollination, selection, hybridization, and inbreeding, each of which modifies the structure and variability of a population in distinct ways.

For landrace cultivators and conservation-focused projects, breeding is not simply a tool for yield or potency enhancement. It is a framework for maintaining genotypic and phenotypic diversity, preventing genetic bottlenecks, and stewarding regional populations under threat from genetic homogenization. Methods differ widely depending on aim and context: landrace populations are often maintained through open pollination within isolated demes, while formal breeding programs may involve backcrossing and progeny testing to stabilise discrete traits.

 

This section introduces the foundational terms and concepts used in cannabis breeding, with particular attention to practices relevant to landrace cultivation. Entries include both traditional and scientific terminology, and aim to clarify how selection, reproductive control, and genetic structure interact in the context of conservation, adaptation, and cultivation.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Sexual Reproduction

Definition: The process by which offspring are produced through the fusion of male and female gametes, resulting in genetic recombination.

Sexual reproduction in Cannabis sativa involves the union of haploid gametes from male (pollen) and female (ovule) floral organs to form a diploid zygote, which develops into a genetically unique seed. This mode of reproduction introduces new allele combinations into a population through meiotic recombination and independent assortment, increasing phenotypic variation and adaptive potential across generations.

In dioecious populations, such as landrace cannabis genepools, male and female reproductive structures are borne on separate individuals, necessitating cross-pollination. This promotes outcrossing and helps maintain broad genetic diversity. In contrast, monoecious or hermaphroditic plants, which occur sporadically in some landraces and frequently in modern polyhybrids, can self-pollinate and therefore reduce heterozygosity over time, particularly under strong inbreeding pressure.

From a breeding perspective, sexual reproduction is foundational to processes such as hybridization, selection and population maintenance. It is especially important in open-pollinated systems where gene flow among individuals shapes the structure of local demes. Understanding the mechanics of sexual reproduction is essential for managing genepool integrity, preventing bottlenecks and facilitating adaptive evolution in situ.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Natural Selection

Definition: The differential survival and reproduction of individuals due to heritable variation in traits within a given environment.

Natural selection is a fundamental mechanism of evolution through which traits that enhance an organism’s fitness (defined as its reproductive success in a particular environment) become more common in a population over generations. In Cannabis sativa, natural selection acts on phenotypic variation within populations growing without deliberate human intervention, such as in feral stands or traditional cultivation systems with minimal selection pressure. Traits subject to natural selection include drought tolerance, pest resistance, seed dispersal capacity, and flowering time synchronized with local climatic cycles.

Unlike artificial selection, natural selection operates continuously and unconsciously, driven by ecological pressures rather than breeder intention. In landrace cannabis, natural selection plays a significant role in maintaining local adaptation and resilience, especially in marginal or low-input agroecosystems. However, natural and artificial selection often act concurrently in domesticated populations, making it difficult to isolate the effects of either in long-cultivated landraces.

The concept is central to understanding how populations evolve in response to environmental constraints, and how certain traits become fixed or eliminated over time in the absence of human interference.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Selective Breeding

Definition: The intentional mating of individuals with desired traits to increase the frequency of those traits in subsequent generations.

Selective breeding is a foundational method in both traditional and modern plant cultivation. In the context of Cannabis sativa, it involves identifying plants that express target phenotypes (such as early flowering, cannabinoid content, disease resistance, or morphological traits) and deliberately crossing them to concentrate those features within a population. This process relies on natural genetic variation within a genepool and presupposes sexual reproduction and trait heritability.

 

In landrace populations, selective breeding is often informal and occurs over many generations through farmer-led practices. Such selection may be conscious (based on perceived agronomic value or psychoactive effect) or unconscious, via repeated replanting of seed from the most productive or resinous individuals. This contrasts with industrial or commercial breeding programs, which typically involve structured selection schemes, record-keeping, and controlled pollination to fix traits rapidly.

 

Selective breeding can lead to local adaptation, especially when selection occurs under specific ecological or cultural conditions. However, intense directional selection may reduce genetic diversity, particularly if few individuals are used as parental stock. In contrast, open-pollinated landrace populations often maintain a wider range of genetic variation while still reflecting long-term human selection pressures.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Mass selection

Definition: Mass selection is a breeding method in which a population is improved by harvesting seeds from a group of phenotypically superior individuals and using them to establish the next generation.

In mass selection, the breeder identifies plants with desirable observable traits (such as vigor, flowering time, resin production, or pest resistance) and harvests seed from a large number of these individuals. Selection is typically based on phenotype rather than genotype and the plants are grown in open pollination, allowing random mating among selected individuals. This method preserves high levels of genetic variation while gradually increasing the frequency of favorable alleles in the population over successive generations.

Mass selection is a traditional method widely used in the maintenance and improvement of landrace populations and open-pollinated cultivars. Its simplicity, low cost and minimal infrastructure requirements make it especially relevant in low-input or subsistence farming systems. In cannabis, mass selection is frequently used by farmers conserving heirloom or landrace populations in situ, where the goal is population-level adaptation rather than uniformity or hybrid vigor.

The effectiveness of mass selection depends on heritability of the trait under selection and the intensity of selection pressure. It is best suited to traits with high phenotypic expression and moderate to high additive genetic variance. Unlike pure line selection or pedigree breeding, mass selection does not involve tracking individual lineages, and it is inherently a population-level strategy.

Ambiguity occasionally arises in distinguishing mass selection from bulk selection, which also uses open pollination but typically includes a generational delay between selection and reseeding. Some definitions also include negative selection (removal of inferior plants), though this is more precisely classified under roguing.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Roguing

Definition: The deliberate removal of undesirable plants from a crop population to preserve or enhance genetic integrity.

Roguing is a selective practice in plant breeding and seed production used to eliminate individuals that exhibit undesirable phenotypes, disease symptoms, or off-type traits. It is typically conducted before flowering to prevent unwanted pollination, although late-stage roguing may also be used to refine traits in mass selection programs. In landrace and open-pollinated populations, roguing helps maintain characteristic expressions while reducing the frequency of deleterious mutations, off-types, or unwanted introgression. Its effectiveness depends on the breeder’s ability to identify trait deviations and distinguish between phenotypic variation and environmental effects.

In genetically heterogeneous populations, such as those maintained under mass selection or open pollination, roguing may serve both conservation and improvement goals. It can be applied at multiple growth stages (seedling, vegetative, or reproductive) depending on the traits under selection. In contrast to culling based on performance metrics alone, roguing typically emphasizes visible, heritable traits aligned with population standards or breeding objectives.

The boundary between roguing and selection is ambiguous, particularly in traditional agricultural contexts where farmers manage diversity by removing specific plants based on experience or cultural norms. In seed certification systems, roguing is often mandated to ensure varietal purity, especially for foundation and registered seed classes.

Related practices such as negative selection and counter-selection may differ in their specific intent (e.g. removal for experimental comparison), but the underlying principle; systematic removal to influence genetic structure, remains similar.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Negative/Counter selection

Definition: The deliberate removal of individuals exhibiting undesirable traits from a breeding population to suppress their genetic contribution.

In plant breeding, counter selection is used to reduce the frequency of alleles associated with unwanted phenotypes. This method complements positive selection by focusing on eliminating traits rather than promoting them. In landrace populations, counter selection may target phenotypes such as late maturation, hermaphroditism, poor disease resistance, or undesirable chemotype expression. It can be implemented at any stage of development, from seedling to harvest, depending on trait visibility.

 

Counter selection is especially important in maintaining the agronomic integrity of genetically diverse populations under open pollination, where phenotypic variance can be high. In landrace cannabis cultivation, for instance, farmers may practice counter selection by removing weak-stemmed males before pollen release or culling mold-susceptible individuals during the rainy season. When systematically applied across generations, counter selection can significantly shift population structure and allele frequencies.

The term is occasionally conflated with negative selection, though the latter may also refer to selection at the molecular level or to natural selection against deleterious mutations in evolutionary biology. In agricultural contexts, the distinction remains largely terminological, with both concepts aiming to reduce undesirable traits through removal rather than promotion.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Pollination

Definition: The transfer of pollen from the male reproductive organs to the female stigmatic surface, enabling fertilization in sexually reproducing plants.

In Cannabis sativa, a dioecious and anemophilous (wind-pollinated) species, pollination occurs when airborne pollen from staminate (male) plants contacts the stigmas of pistillate (female) plants. Successful pollination triggers fertilization, leading to seed formation. In landrace populations, natural open pollination maintains high genetic diversity, allowing dynamic adaptation to local environmental pressures.

Breeders can manipulate pollination to influence genetic outcomes: controlled pollination is used to create specific hybrids or stabilize traits through selective crosses, while open pollination preserves broader population variability and reflects traditional farming systems. Timing and isolation are critical, as pollen viability is brief (typically under five days under field conditions) and cross-pollination over distances of several kilometers is possible under ideal wind conditions.

Cannabis cultivation contexts often differentiate between seed crops, which require pollination and seedless cannabis production, where pollination is deliberately avoided to maximize cannabinoid yield in unfertilized flowers. Traditional farmers may practice selective pollination by retaining favored males near target females or by manually introducing pollen, though such methods vary regionally and are often undocumented.

Ambiguities in cannabis breeding terminology can arise, particularly in conflating fertilization with pollination. While pollination refers only to pollen transfer, fertilization denotes the subsequent fusion of gametes. In common usage, especially outside formal breeding contexts, the terms are frequently interchanged.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Open Pollination

Definition: Fertilization that occurs through natural, unrestricted pollen dispersal among a population of sexually compatible plants.

Open pollination refers to a breeding system in which both male and female reproductive structures are freely exposed to environmental pollination vectors such as wind or insects, without human-mediated selection or control over individual pollination events. In cannabis, this typically involves allowing numerous male plants to shed pollen across a diverse population of receptive females within an isolated area, resulting in a broad, genetically heterogeneous seed population.

For landrace conservation and adaptation-focused breeding, open pollination plays a critical role in maintaining high levels of genetic diversity and enabling natural selection to act on polygenic traits. It allows alleles conferring local adaptation to persist and recombine across generations, supporting resilience in dynamic agroecological contexts. By contrast, controlled pollination methods (such as single-pair crosses or selfing) may limit genetic variability and increase homozygosity, potentially narrowing the population’s adaptive capacity.

However, open pollination can also perpetuate undesirable traits unless managed within a well-characterized and selectively culled base population. The method is most effective when applied to large, relatively isolated populations that minimize pollen contamination from unrelated genepools, especially in outcrossing species like Cannabis sativa, which exhibit a high natural outcrossing rate under open conditions.

Some breeding programs distinguish between mass selection followed by open pollination and true recurrent selection schemes, where controlled pollination is used to guide trait inheritance. In informal or traditional systems, open pollination is often practiced without deliberate selection, leading to populations that are genetically broad but may drift over time in response to environmental or cultural pressures.

Open pollination is central to both in situ and ex situ conservation of landrace varieties, particularly when the goal is to maintain evolutionary potential rather than fix specific traits.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Seed Formation

Definition: The process by which a fertilized ovule develops into a mature, viable seed.

Seed formation in Cannabis sativa begins with successful double fertilization following pollen tube penetration of the ovule. The primary fertilization event results in a diploid zygote, which develops into the embryo, while the secondary fertilization produces a triploid endosperm that nourishes the embryo during development. Surrounding maternal tissues form the seed coat, derived from the ovule integuments. In

cannabis, this process typically unfolds over four to six weeks depending on environmental conditions, genotype, and maternal resource allocation.

The formation of viable seeds is a key objective in open-pollination, controlled breeding, and conservation programs. Seed viability is influenced by factors such as pollination timing, maternal health, and stress exposure during seed fill. In traditional landrace cultivation systems, seed formation is rarely artificially managed, but in ex situ settings, factors such as nutrient levels, photoperiod and pollen availability must be carefully controlled to ensure genetic integrity and sufficient seed set.

 

In dioecious cannabis, pollen is contributed exclusively by male or intersex individuals. Manual pollination or isolation techniques are often used in breeding to prevent undesired gene flow. Because cannabis exhibits high degrees of phenotypic plasticity, poor seed formation may not always reflect genetic sterility, but rather environmental interference such as heat, drought, or insufficient pollination.

 

Though seed development is a relatively conserved process in angiosperms, the size, shape, and hardness of mature cannabis seeds can vary considerably between populations. These traits may influence post-harvest handling, storage, and natural dispersal mechanisms, particularly in feral or wild populations that retain strong shattering tendencies.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Seed Shatter

Definition: The natural detachment and dispersal of mature seeds from a plant's reproductive structures.

Seed shatter is an ancestral trait in Cannabis sativa and many other annuals, allowing seeds to be released from the fruit (achene) upon maturation. In shattering types, the abscission layer at the base of the seed or pedicel weakens as seeds reach physiological maturity, enabling passive dispersal by gravity, wind or disturbance. This process enhances fitness in the wild by distributing progeny across space and reducing sibling competition.

In domesticated cannabis, seed shatter is generally undesirable, as it complicates harvest, reduces yield and increases seed loss. Breeding for reduced shatter has long been a target in seed production systems, especially for hemp fiber or grain, where synchrony and retention facilitate mechanized harvesting. The trait is genetically variable and appears to be heritable, though the underlying loci remain poorly characterized in cannabis compared to important commercial crops like cereals, for example. Selection for reduced shatter may coincide with other domestication traits, such as non-dormancy or synchronous flowering, and may be indirectly selected in closed-pollination systems.

Seed shatter must be distinguished from seed abscission timing, which can vary by environment and genotype. High shatter rates are common in feral and landrace populations, especially those under natural or low-input selection regimes. In contrast, modern cultivars typically exhibit partial or full non-shattering phenotypes.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Seed Ripeness

Definition: The process by which a fertilized ovule develops into a mature, viable seed.

Seed formation in Cannabis sativa begins with successful double fertilization following pollen tube penetration of the ovule. The primary fertilization event results in a diploid zygote, which develops into the embryo, while the secondary fertilization produces a triploid endosperm that nourishes the embryo during development. Surrounding maternal tissues form the seed coat, derived from the ovule integuments. In

cannabis, this process typically unfolds over four to six weeks depending on environmental conditions, genotype, and maternal resource allocation.

The formation of viable seeds is a key objective in open-pollination, controlled breeding, and conservation programs. Seed viability is influenced by factors such as pollination timing, maternal health, and stress exposure during seed fill. In traditional landrace cultivation systems, seed formation is rarely artificially managed, but in ex situ settings, factors such as nutrient levels, photoperiod and pollen availability must be carefully controlled to ensure genetic integrity and sufficient seed set.

 

In dioecious cannabis, pollen is contributed exclusively by male or intersex individuals. Manual pollination or isolation techniques are often used in breeding to prevent undesired gene flow. Because cannabis exhibits high degrees of phenotypic plasticity, poor seed formation may not always reflect genetic sterility, but rather environmental interference such as heat, drought, or insufficient pollination.

 

Though seed development is a relatively conserved process in angiosperms, the size, shape, and hardness of mature cannabis seeds can vary considerably between populations. These traits may influence post-harvest handling, storage, and natural dispersal mechanisms, particularly in feral or wild populations that retain strong shattering tendencies.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Outcrossing

Definition: The introduction of genetic material from an unrelated individual or population through sexual reproduction.

In cannabis breeding, outcrossing refers to mating between genetically distinct individuals, typically from separate populations, accessions, or cultivars. This contrasts with inbreeding, which involves genetically similar parents. Outcrossing increases heterozygosity in the resulting progeny and can introduce novel traits, restore vigor in inbred lines (heterosis), or reduce the risk of deleterious recessive alleles becoming homozygous. It is a fundamental tool in maintaining genetic diversity within a population and is especially significant in landrace conservation, where unmanaged outcrossing between introduced and local populations may alter the genetic structure of the original landrace.

While outcrossing can be a deliberate breeding strategy, it also occurs unintentionally, particularly in open-pollinated cannabis fields. This is of concern in regions where modern hybrids are cultivated near landrace populations, leading to what some consider genetic erosion. However, defining what constitutes an “unrelated” population is not always straightforward, especially among interfertile landraces with shared ancestry or clinal variation across regions.

Some breeders apply outcrossing as part of composite breeding, where multiple diverse populations are intermated to form a broad-based genepool, followed by recurrent selection. Others may use a targeted outcross followed by backcrossing to retain specific traits from a parental line while introducing a single trait from the donor.

Outcrossing can occur at various levels: between individuals of the same accession, between accessions within a landrace region, or between genetically distant populations such as domesticated varieties and wild or feral plants. The genetic and phenotypic consequences vary accordingly.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Filial generation

Definition: The sequential generations of offspring resulting from controlled sexual reproduction, typically denoted by the prefix “F” followed by a numeral (e.g., F1, F2).

In breeding, the term “filial generation” refers to the progeny produced through sexual reproduction between parent plants of known lineage. The first filial generation (F1) is the direct offspring of a cross between two distinct parent lines (P1 × P2), while subsequent generations (F2, F3, etc.) are derived through selfing or intercrossing within the progeny of the previous generation. Each generation represents a new phase of genetic recombination and segregation, making filial generations a central unit of analysis in selection, hybridization, and stabilization strategies.

In landrace contexts, “filial generation” may also be used to describe the offspring of plants selected from within a genepool following outcrossing, mass selection, or open pollination, though usage in such cases can be inconsistent and context-dependent. Unlike clonal or asexual propagation, each filial generation reshuffles allelic combinations, increasing phenotypic diversity in early generations (F2–F3) and enabling the expression of recessive traits through segregation. Stabilization typically requires multiple generations of selective inbreeding to reach uniformity in traits of interest.

In commercial hybrid breeding, F1 hybrids are valued for their uniformity and may exhibit heterosis (hybrid vigor), while in landrace breeding or conservation contexts, later filial generations (F3–F6+) are more relevant for capturing and fixing desirable traits from diverse parental material. The degree of genetic variance and heritability in each generation determines the breeder’s capacity to direct phenotypic outcomes through selection.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Backcross

Definition: The deliberate crossing of a hybrid organism with one of its original parental genotypes to recover or stabilize specific traits.

In cannabis breeding, a backcross is used to introduce or reinforce desired traits from a donor parent while preserving the broader genetic background of a recurrent parent. The initial cross (P1 × P2) produces a first filial generation (F1), which is then crossed back to one of the original parents, typically the one possessing the trait to be fixed. Repeated backcrossing (e.g., bx1, bx2, bx3) can progressively increase the proportion of the recurrent parent’s genome while retaining the targeted allele or phenotype from the donor. This method is widely used to stabilize traits such as cannabinoid or terpene expression, disease resistance, or morphology.

In landrace-oriented breeding, backcrossing is sometimes employed to preserve rare expressions encountered in outlier plants without losing the landrace population’s broader adaptive genetic base. However, overuse of backcrossing can lead to inbreeding depression and a reduction in heterozygosity, particularly if the same recurrent parent is used without introducing new genetic material². Molecular markers and genomic analysis can assist in monitoring the retention of donor traits and managing genetic drag, undesirable linked traits that may also be inherited during backcrossing.

While the term "bx" typically refers to a single generation of backcrossing, multiple successive backcrosses are denoted with a number (e.g., bx1, bx2). The threshold for when a line is considered "stabilized" via backcrossing remains context-dependent and is not standardized across breeding communities.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Inbreeding

Definition: The repeated mating of closely related individuals, resulting in increased homozygosity across a population.

Inbreeding reduces genetic diversity by increasing the probability that offspring inherit identical alleles from both parents. This leads to higher homozygosity and can facilitate the fixation of desirable traits, which is why it is commonly used in breeding programs aiming to stabilise specific phenotypes. However, elevated homozygosity also increases the likelihood of deleterious recessive alleles being expressed, a phenomenon known as inbreeding depression. Symptoms of inbreeding depression in Cannabis sativa may include reduced vigour, lower fertility, compromised pest resistance, and atypical morphological traits.

In landrace populations, inbreeding levels vary according to factors such as population size, mating structure, and isolation. While many traditional cannabis populations exhibit some degree of inbreeding due to localized pollination and seed-saving practices, they are often buffered from severe inbreeding depression by the presence of standing genetic variation and occasional gene flow from neighbouring demes. Intentional inbreeding, such as repeated selfing or sibling crosses, is often employed during the creation of inbred lines (IBLs) for hybrid production, but must be managed carefully to avoid long-term loss of fitness.

Some ambiguity exists in vernacular usage of the term. In commercial cannabis circles, “inbred” is sometimes misused to imply genetic purity or stabilisation, when in fact it denotes a narrowing of the gene pool that can lead to fragility over successive generations.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Stabilisation

Definition: The process of reducing phenotypic and genotypic variability within a breeding population over successive generations.

In plant breeding, stabilisation refers to the progressive fixation of desired traits in a population through methods such as inbreeding, selection, or recurrent selfing. The goal is to produce uniform offspring that consistently express a target phenotype and genotype, particularly in cultivars intended for predictable performance under cultivation.

 

Stabilisation is often pursued following hybridisation or the introduction of new genetic material, as early filial generations (e.g. F1, F2) tend to display significant segregation and heterogeneity.

Stabilisation can be achieved through different breeding strategies depending on the crop and reproductive system. In sexually reproducing diploid plants like Cannabis sativa, this typically involves self-pollination or sib-mating across multiple generations, during which alleles become fixed and heterozygosity declines. Marker-assisted selection and progeny testing may be used to accelerate the process or verify uniformity. In open-pollinated populations or traditional landraces, stabilisation may emerge gradually under strong directional selection, but such populations often retain higher levels of within-population diversity than modern inbred lines.

 

The term is occasionally used loosely in cannabis contexts to refer to general uniformity or predictability in a seedline, without reference to formal breeding methods or population structure. However, rigorous stabilisation implies both phenotypic consistency and genetic fixation within a defined breeding population.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Inbred Line (IBL)

Definition: An inbred line is a genetically uniform population derived through repeated self-fertilization or full-sibling mating over multiple generations.

Inbred lines are developed to achieve genetic fixation, meaning individuals in the population are nearly homozygous at all loci. In plant breeding, this process typically involves six or more generations of selfing or controlled sibling mating, with selection for desired traits throughout. The resulting population expresses minimal phenotypic variation and transmits traits predictably to its offspring.

In Cannabis sativa, true inbred lines are rare due to the species’ strong inbreeding depression, dioecious sexual system, and high natural heterozygosity. However, some breeders use the term “IBL” colloquially to refer to relatively uniform seed lines maintained through selective breeding, even if they do not meet formal genetic criteria for inbreeding. This has led to ambiguity in usage, particularly within the cannabis trade, where “IBL” may refer to either a genetically stabilized cultivar or a line that simply breeds true for certain traits.

The utility of inbred lines lies primarily in their role as parental stocks in hybrid breeding. When two genetically distinct inbred lines are crossed, the resulting F₁ hybrid often expresses heterosis (hybrid vigor), with superior performance relative to both parents. However, the loss of genetic diversity during inbreeding makes these lines less adaptable outside of controlled environments.

In landrace conservation, the concept of inbred lines is largely irrelevant or counterproductive, as it conflicts with the goals of preserving heterogeneity, local adaptation, and dynamic evolutionary potential.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Phenohunting

Definition: An inbred line is a genetically uniform population derived through repeated self-fertilization or full-sibling mating over multiple generations.

Inbred lines are developed to achieve genetic fixation, meaning individuals in the population are nearly homozygous at all loci. In plant breeding, this process typically involves six or more generations of selfing or controlled sibling mating, with selection for desired traits throughout. The resulting population expresses minimal phenotypic variation and transmits traits predictably to its offspring.

In Cannabis sativa, true inbred lines are rare due to the species’ strong inbreeding depression, dioecious sexual system, and high natural heterozygosity. However, some breeders use the term “IBL” colloquially to refer to relatively uniform seed lines maintained through selective breeding, even if they do not meet formal genetic criteria for inbreeding. This has led to ambiguity in usage, particularly within the cannabis trade, where “IBL” may refer to either a genetically stabilized cultivar or a line that simply breeds true for certain traits.

The utility of inbred lines lies primarily in their role as parental stocks in hybrid breeding. When two genetically distinct inbred lines are crossed, the resulting F₁ hybrid often expresses heterosis (hybrid vigor), with superior performance relative to both parents. However, the loss of genetic diversity during inbreeding makes these lines less adaptable outside of controlled environments.

In landrace conservation, the concept of inbred lines is largely irrelevant or counterproductive, as it conflicts with the goals of preserving heterogeneity, local adaptation, and dynamic evolutionary potential.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Selfing

Definition: The process of producing offspring through self-fertilization, typically by inducing a plant to pollinate itself.

In cannabis breeding, selfing refers to the deliberate creation of progeny from a single, genetically female plant by inducing it to produce viable pollen, usually through chemical means such as colloidal silver or silver thiosulfate. This pollen is then used to fertilize the same plant or a genetically identical clone, resulting in “selfed” (S1) seeds. These seeds are often highly homozygous and retain many of the parent plant’s traits, making selfing a common method for producing feminized seeds and stabilizing desirable phenotypes.

Because selfing bypasses natural cross-pollination, it accelerates the process of inbreeding and increases the likelihood of homozygosity at multiple loci. While this can be useful for fixing traits, it also elevates the risk of inbreeding depression, especially in genetically narrow or previously bottlenecked populations. The practical outcomes of selfing vary by genotype: vigorous, heterozygous plants may produce a diverse but viable S1 population, whereas already inbred lines may yield weak, unstable offspring.

Selfing is widely used in commercial cannabis breeding to rapidly create uniform feminized seed lines. However, it is rarely used in traditional landrace contexts, where open pollination and population diversity are prioritized. For conservation purposes, repeated selfing is discouraged, as it can reduce genetic diversity and obscure population-level traits.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Reproductions

Definition: The regeneration of a cannabis population through intentional grow-outs, typically to produce seed for conservation, study, or redistribution.

In landrace conservation and breeding contexts, a reproduction refers to the cultivation of a population (often outside its native environment) for the purpose of producing the next generation of seed. These are usually conducted in controlled settings such as tents, greenhouses, or small outdoor plots. The goal is not selection or breeding per se, but seed increase while maintaining the genetic integrity of the original accession.

 

Proper reproductions aim to preserve the population’s allele frequencies by avoiding directional selection, minimizing bottlenecks, and allowing open pollination among a sufficiently large and representative number of individuals. This requires maintaining effective population sizes and retaining both male and female plants. Deviations such as selecting only “the best” females, excluding males, or growing in conditions radically different from the original environment can distort genetic structure through drift, selection, or unintentional domestication.

Reproductions are foundational to both ex situ conservation efforts and to the ethical distribution of seed to researchers, growers, and breeders. However, reproductions carried out in artificial environments (especially when repeated over multiple generations) can lead to adaptation to indoor conditions or unintentional loss of diversity.

Terminology varies, with some practitioners using “regeneration” interchangeably. Others distinguish reproductions (minimal-intervention, seed increase) from breeding grows (selective or directional). In all cases, transparency about methods and population structure is critical for responsible conservation and distribution.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049600.jpg

Asexual Propagation

Asexual propagation refers to any method of reproducing cannabis without seed formation or fertilization. All progeny are genetically identical to the parent, preserving the source plant’s genotype and phenotype across generations. These methods play a key role in modern cultivation systems where consistency, uniformity, and chemotypic stability are prioritized, particularly in commercial and medical contexts.

In contrast, traditional landrace systems overwhelmingly rely on sexual reproduction, favoring genetic diversity, local adaptation, and long-term ecological resilience. The growing use of clonal propagation among smallholder farmers marks a fundamental shift in agroecological practice with implications for population structure, pest susceptibility, and seed stewardship.

This section explores the biology and techniques of asexual propagation in cannabis.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Cuttings

Definition: Cuttings are detached vegetative plant segments used to propagate genetically identical offspring through asexual reproduction.

In cannabis cultivation, cuttings (typically sections of stem with attached nodes) are taken from a donor plant and induced to form adventitious roots under controlled environmental conditions. Once rooted, the new plant retains the complete genotype of the donor, making cuttings a primary method for preserving desirable traits such as chemotype, morphology, or environmental resilience. Stem cuttings are the most common in cannabis, though leaf and root cuttings are possible in other species.

Rooting success is influenced by multiple factors, including nodal positioning, hormonal balance (notably auxins like indole-3-butyric acid), temperature, humidity, and light intensity. High humidity and moderate light are critical during the rooting phase to minimize transpiration and support cell differentiation.

Propagation via cuttings is widely used to maintain elite cultivars in commercial production and research. However, in landrace populations, clonal propagation is rare or absent, as traditional cannabis cultivation relies on seed propagation, which maintains genetic diversity through sexual reproduction. 

While genetically stable, clonal lineages can accumulate somatic mutations and epigenetic drift over successive generations, potentially altering phenotype or vigor. These factors underscore the importance of maintaining mother plants in optimal health and periodically regenerating stock from seed when possible.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Grafting

Definition: The union of two genetically distinct plant parts to grow as a single organism through vascular tissue fusion.

Grafting is a method of asexual propagation in which the shoot system (scion) of one plant is physically joined to the root system (rootstock) of another. Once vascular continuity is established, the scion continues growth supported by the rootstock’s water and nutrient uptake. In cannabis, grafting is rarely used for commercial production but may offer utility in preserving multiple cultivars on a single plant, maintaining mother stock in constrained spaces, or exploring genotype–rootstock interactions.

Successful grafting requires taxonomic compatibility (typically within the same species or genus) as well as precise alignment of the vascular cambium and maintenance of sterile, humid conditions during the healing phase. While common in perennial horticulture, cannabis poses challenges due to its annual life cycle, hollow stems, and relatively low natural graft compatibility compared to ligneous species. Still, experimental grafting has demonstrated viability between Cannabis sativa genotypes and even between C. sativa and Humulus lupulus under controlled conditions.

 

Grafting can allow phenotypic expression of a scion genotype to be assessed while maintaining a uniform root system across trials, making it useful for studying chemotypic variation independent of root traits.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

tissue CUlture

Definition: An in vitro method of asexual propagation in which whole plants are regenerated from small tissue samples under sterile laboratory conditions.

Tissue culture, or micropropagation, enables the clonal reproduction of plants from minute tissue explants (typically meristematic cells, nodes, or shoot tips) on nutrient media supplemented with plant growth regulators.

 

The process comprises four main stages: initiation, multiplication, rooting, and acclimatization. It is conducted under aseptic conditions to prevent microbial contamination, with growth regulated by the relative concentrations of auxins and cytokinins.

In Cannabis sativa, tissue culture has been used to preserve elite genotypes, produce virus-free material, and facilitate long-distance germplasm exchange without relying on viable seed. Its relevance to landrace conservation is limited by high technical barriers, cost, and the relatively poor regeneration capacity of many traditional genotypes, which often exhibit recalcitrance in vitro. However, the technique has been proposed as a method for long-term conservation via slow-growth storage or cryopreservation of high-value or threatened cultivars.

Unlike propagation by cuttings, tissue culture allows the generation of a large number of uniform plants from very limited source material, but it requires specialized training, equipment, and sustained sterility. Somaclonal variation (genetic or epigenetic change introduced during culture) is a known risk in extended subculturing cycles and must be monitored when genetic fidelity is critical.

Tissue culture remains a marginal method in landrace cannabis cultivation, primarily due to its limited accessibility, but it plays a role in ex situ conservation efforts and commercial-scale production of proprietary hybrid cultivars.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049600.jpg

Conservation

Definition: The maintenance of genetic, ecological, and cultural diversity across time through deliberate strategies that preserve the evolutionary potential and local adaptation of plant populations.

In the context of cannabis and traditional agriculture, conservation encompasses more than static preservation. It includes the dynamic management of seed, knowledge and environment in ways that sustain the integrity and adaptability of landrace populations. We distinguish between ex situ strategies such as seed banking and in situ strategies rooted in living systems of cultivation and cultural knowledge.

 

This section defines terms in both the biological and sociopolitical realms of conservation, recognizing that genetic diversity is entangled with local practices, autonomy and ecological resilience.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Genetic Diversity

Definition: The total heritable variation within and among populations of a species, encompassing allelic richness, heterozygosity, and phenotypic plasticity.

Genetic diversity enables populations to adapt to environmental pressures, resist pathogens, and maintain reproductive fitness over generations. In landrace cannabis, high genetic diversity is often preserved through open pollination, large population sizes, and continual adaptation to local agroecological conditions. This contrasts with highly uniform cultivars produced by inbreeding or clonal propagation, which may suffer from reduced resilience due to genetic bottlenecking and inbreeding depression.

 

Diversity is measured at multiple levels, including within-individual heterozygosity, intra-population allelic frequency, and inter-population differentiation. Molecular tools such as microsatellites, SNP arrays, and genome-wide sequencing allow quantification of genetic variation and identification of loci under selection. Conservation of genetic diversity is a cornerstone of crop resilience and food sovereignty, especially for species like cannabis with complex domestication histories and widespread vernacular adaptation.

While genetic diversity is broadly understood as beneficial, conservation priorities differ between in situ (on-farm) and ex situ (gene bank) strategies. The former emphasizes dynamic adaptation within living agricultural systems, while the latter focuses on static preservation of allelic combinations. Both approaches risk unintended loss of diversity if not managed with an understanding of local breeding systems and cultural practices.

In cannabis, especially in regions with active suppression or criminalization, genetic diversity is often threatened by both top-down eradication efforts and bottom-up shifts toward high-yield or high-THC cultivars. Conservation programs must therefore consider not only biological variation but also the sociopolitical contexts that shape its maintenance or erosion.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Introgression

Definition: The stable incorporation of genetic material from one population or taxon into the gene pool of another through repeated backcrossing.

Introgression occurs when hybrid offspring between two distinct populations or taxa mate back with one of the parental groups over successive generations, leading to the transfer and persistence of alleles from one gene pool into another. This process can be natural or anthropogenic and may affect genetic integrity, adaptation and conservation value of landrace populations.

In conservation contexts, introgression presents a dual-edged concern. On one hand, it may introduce novel adaptive alleles, potentially enhancing stress tolerance or pathogen resistance. On the other, uncontrolled or repeated introgression from genetically divergent or commercialized populations can lead to genetic homogenization, erosion of local adaptation and loss of unique chemotypic or phenotypic traits. In situ conservation of landrace cannabis, especially in regions exposed to hybrid seed influx or tourism-driven cultivation, requires monitoring for introgressive signatures that may compromise the distinctiveness of regional populations.

The extent and consequences of introgression are often difficult to determine without molecular analysis. In cannabis, morphological similarity does not guarantee genetic continuity, particularly where historical outcrossing has occurred with modern hybrids or introduced feral populations. Some conservation frameworks advocate treating moderate introgression as part of a dynamic evolutionary process, while others regard it as a threat to biocultural heritage.

Interpretations of introgression vary depending on species, conservation goals and cultural perspectives. In the context of cannabis landrace conservation, clear distinctions should be made between stable local adaptation, historic gene flow and recent disruptive introgression from industrial or non-local sources.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Extinction by Introgression

Definition: The loss of a genetically distinct population or species through extensive gene flow from another population, resulting in assimilation rather than demographic disappearance.

Extinction by introgression occurs when interbreeding between a native population and a more widespread or genetically dominant population leads to the erosion of the native population’s unique genetic identity.

 

Unlike demographic extinction (where a population disappears due to death or reproductive failure) this form of extinction leaves descendants behind, but those descendants no longer carry the defining genetic or phenotypic traits of the original population. In the context of landrace cannabis conservation, introgressive extinction can result from repeated crossings with high-yield commercial hybrids or stabilized cultivars, especially in open-pollinated environments.

This process is particularly concerning in regions where traditional landraces are grown in proximity to introduced varieties, as pollen-mediated gene flow can lead to the gradual dilution of traits that are locally adapted, culturally significant, or otherwise unique. In small or isolated populations, even low levels of recurrent introgression can rapidly alter allelic frequencies and break down coadapted gene complexes that evolved under local environmental and cultural conditions.

Whether introgression leads to extinction is context-dependent. Some scholars argue that low-level gene flow can enhance adaptive potential without compromising distinctiveness, while others emphasize that recurrent introgression (especially from genetically uniform or selectively bred sources) poses an existential threat to small, fragmented populations. The difficulty in defining what constitutes “extinction” in this context remains debated, particularly in cases where phenotypic distinctiveness persists despite underlying genomic assimilation.

 

In cannabis conservation, strategies to mitigate extinction by introgression could theoretically include spatial or temporal isolation, pollen containment methods and participatory breeding systems that reinforce traditional selection pressures and reproductive autonomy.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Demographic extinction

Definition: The loss of a population due to a failure in demographic processes such as reproduction, recruitment, or survival, leading to a decline below a viable threshold.

Demographic extinction occurs when a population becomes unsustainable due to stochastic or deterministic demographic factors (such as reduced birth rates, high mortality, unbalanced sex ratios, or skewed age structures) that prevent long-term persistence. This mode of extinction is typically associated with small or isolated populations, where genetic, environmental, or social pressures erode reproductive viability over time.

 

In landrace cultivation systems, demographic extinction can occur when traditional cultivation ceases or drastically declines, resulting in the collapse of seed renewal cycles. Even if seeds remain viable in storage or exist in feral stands, the absence of structured reproduction and selection under traditional agroecological regimes leads to population decline. Over time, the lack of recruitment and loss of demographic resilience (particularly through the removal of male plants or failure to germinate diverse seedstocks) can result in irreversible loss.

Unlike genetic or ecological extinction, which may involve hybridization or habitat loss, demographic extinction emphasizes internal reproductive collapse. It is particularly relevant to conservation of sexually reproducing crops such as Cannabis sativa, where seed lineages require active human propagation to avoid demographic bottlenecks and eventual disappearance.

Contested boundaries exist between demographic and genetic extinction when reduced population size accelerates inbreeding depression or loss of heterozygosity. In practice, demographic and genetic factors are often entangled in smallholder systems, and effective conservation requires addressing both simultaneously.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Eradications

Definition: The deliberate removal of plant populations through state-led or institutional programs aimed at eliminating cultivation or feral growth.

 

Eradication programs target specific taxa considered illicit, invasive, or undesirable, typically through mechanical destruction, herbicidal spraying, or incineration. In the context of cannabis, eradication efforts have been a central feature of prohibitionist drug policy since the mid-20th century. These campaigns often conflate Cannabis sativa broadly with narcotics trafficking, regardless of cultivar chemotype, ecological function, or cultural relevance.

 

In regions with long-standing vernacular cannabis cultivation, eradications can result in severe losses of local genetic diversity, disrupt agroecological knowledge systems, and erode landrace populations through both direct removal and indirect disincentives to continued propagation. In situ germplasm is particularly vulnerable when law enforcement targets seed-bearing plants or ancestral stands adapted to specific microclimates.

 

Eradication policies have also produced perverse ecological outcomes, such as promoting genetic bottlenecks, forcing cultivation into ecologically fragile areas, and contributing to the rise of uniform, high-potency hybrid cultivars selected for concealment and rapid turnover. In some cases, attempts to destroy feral populations (such as those found in Central Asia or the Himalayan foothills) have damaged local plant communities and obscured naturalized gene pools with unique traits of agronomic or medicinal interest.

While justified in invasive species management, blanket eradication policies targeting culturally significant crops like cannabis are widely criticized for undermining biodiversity and violating indigenous and peasant rights.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

In situ Conservation

Definition: The maintenance of genetic resources within the ecosystems and agroecosystems where they evolved.

In situ conservation refers to the protection and ongoing cultivation of domesticated, semi-domesticated, or wild plant populations in their native ecological and cultural contexts. For landrace crops such as traditional cannabis varieties, this entails preserving populations in the farming systems, landscapes, and community knowledge networks that shaped their genetic and phenotypic diversity over time.

Unlike ex situ strategies that store seeds in genebanks, in situ approaches allow for continued adaptation through natural and human selection under local environmental pressures. This dynamic evolution is particularly critical for maintaining traits such as disease resistance, drought tolerance, or culturally significant chemotypes. In agrobiodiversity conservation, in situ methods support both biological resilience and the continuity of traditional farming practices and seed exchange networks.

 

In situ conservation is often embedded in broader agroecological systems and dependent on farmers' knowledge, rights, and incentives. It is not limited to formal conservation programs but includes informal stewardship by Indigenous and local communities. Debates persist around the definitions and boundaries of in situ conservation, particularly regarding how much change or external influence a system can undergo before the genetic integrity of the conserved population is compromised².

 

International frameworks such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) recognize the value of in situ conservation and promote participatory approaches that integrate conservation with rural livelihoods and food sovereignty.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

01001696.jpg

Ex situ Conservation

Definition: The preservation of genetic resources outside their natural habitat through storage or cultivation under controlled conditions.

 

Ex situ conservation involves maintaining plant genetic material in gene banks, botanical gardens, seed banks, tissue culture facilities, or other managed environments removed from the ecosystem in which the population originally evolved. This approach is widely used to safeguard genetic diversity under threat from habitat loss, climate change, genetic erosion, or socio-economic pressures. For landrace cannabis, ex situ conservation typically takes the form of seed banks, which store accessions under controlled temperature and humidity conditions to prolong viability and reduce genetic drift over time.

While ex situ strategies provide long-term insurance against extinction, they also remove plants from their ecological and cultural contexts, severing interactions with local farmers, co-evolved pests, soils, and climatic pressures. This can lead to unintentional selection and a loss of adaptive traits over successive regeneration cycles, especially if accessions are multiplied in non-native environments or without careful breeding protocols. For cross-pollinated crops like cannabis, maintaining intra-population variation and avoiding inbreeding depression or genetic bottlenecks requires careful attention to population size, pollination control, and genetic monitoring.

Some conservation frameworks differentiate between base collections (stored for long-term security with minimal regeneration) and active collections (maintained for use in breeding, research, or distribution). Cryopreservation and in vitro conservation are also applied in cases where seed longevity is low or where vegetative propagation is required.

 

Ex situ efforts are often seen as complementary to in situ conservation, especially when the latter is no longer viable due to legal or ecological disruptions. However, critics argue that exclusive reliance on ex situ methods risks depoliticizing conservation by ignoring the social and agrarian systems that sustain crop diversity in the first place.

Related terms: [Genetics] | [Cannabinoids] | [Terpenes] | Navigate to: [Top] | [Index]

P1049600.jpg

Index

bottom of page